[1]祖悦晴a,唐海萍a*,陈玉福,等.三江并流区干旱河谷藏民对人类福祉和生态系统服务的感知[J].山地学报,2024,(4):483-495.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000839]
　ZU Yueqinga,TANG Haipinga*,CHEN Yufu,et al.Perception of Human Well-Being and Ecosystem Services by Tibetans in the Dry Valleys of the Three-Parallel-Rivers Area[J].Mountain Research,2024,(4):483-495.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000839]
点击复制

三江并流区干旱河谷藏民对人类福祉和生态系统服务的感知
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2024年第4期
页码:
483-495
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2024-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Perception of Human Well-Being and Ecosystem Services by Tibetans in the Dry Valleys of the Three-Parallel-Rivers Area
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2024)4-483-13
作者:
祖悦晴1a; 唐海萍1a*; 陈玉福2; 姚冠桐1b; 陈宇超1a; 陈元龙3
(1.北京师范大学 a.地理科学学部自然资源学院,北京 100875; b.文理学院,广东 珠海 519087; 2.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101; 3.北京工业大学 信息学部,北京 100124)
Author(s):
ZU Yueqing1a;  TANG Haiping1a*;  CHEN Yufu2;  YAO Guantong1b;  CHEN Yuchao1a;  CHEN Yuanlong3
(1. a. School of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing 100875; b. Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Guangdong Zhuhai 519087, Beijing Normal University, China; 2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy ofSciences, Beijing 100101, China; 3. Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)
关键词:
三江并流区;  青藏高原;  访谈;  主观福祉;  生态系统服务感知
Keywords:
three-parallel-rivers area;  the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau;  interview;  subjective well-being;  perception of ecosystem services
分类号:
X171.1
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000839
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
人类福祉,从个体生活质量与满意度出发,可用来评估社会发展成效与政府决策有效性。评估利益相关者对人类福祉和生态系统服务的感知,确定福祉与生态系统服务之间关系,是生态保护与提升乡村福祉的重要依据。然而,针对山区开展的乡村福祉和服务感知研究较少,对细分各种类型的服务和各维度福祉的关系仍未予以充分探索,且缺乏对三江并流区干旱河谷这一特殊地区的关注。本研究通过面对面问卷调查和半结构化访谈,定量评估三江并流区干旱河谷藏族居民的福祉水平和其对生态系统服务的感知,并分析两者的相关性。研究发现:(1)三江并流区干旱河谷藏民的福祉总体水平为3.95,五个福祉维度中,最高为良好的社会关系(4.42),其次为安全(4.07)、基本物质需求(4.06)和健康(3.93),而自由和选择得分最低(3.43)。(2)当地藏民对调节服务和文化服务的满意度更高,最重视“水供给和水质”这一供给服务。(3)在福祉维度中,自由和选择与生态系统服务感知的关系最紧密,且呈正相关关系,而基本物质需求与服务感知的关系最弱。(4)推动地区产业发展、创造更多样的工作机会以及提升藏民对生态系统服务的感知,有助于提升自由和选择维度的福祉。本研究结果可为提升干旱河谷区藏民福祉及乡村振兴政策制定提供科学依据。
Abstract:
Human well-being, from the view of individual's quality of life and satisfaction, can be used to assess the effectiveness of social development and government decision-making. Assessing stakeholders' perception of human well-being and ecosystem services and determining the relationship between well-being and ecosystem services is an important basis for ecological protection and planning the updating of rural well-being. However, little attention was paid to the perceptions of well-being and ecosystem services in mountainous areas, and the relationships between various types of ecosystem services and dimensions of well-being had not been fully elaborated, particularly no effects to be made to the rural well-being in dry valleys of the three-parallel-rivers area of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China.
In this study, it conducted face-to-face questionnaires and semi-structured interviews to collect the perception of human well-being and ecosystem services by Tibetan residents in the dry valleys of the three-parallel-rivers area of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China, and then quantitatively analyzed the correlation between the two.
(1)Overall well-being among Tibetan residents in the dry valleys of the three-parallel-rivers area was 3.95, with the highest dimension being good social relationships(4.42), followed by security(4.07), basic materials demand for a good life(4.06), and health(3.93), while freedom of choice and action(3.43)scored the lowest.
(2)Local Tibetan residents were particularly satisfied with regulating services and cultural services, mostly concerning about provisioning services: water supply and water quality.
(3)Among the varied dimensions of well-being, freedom of choice and action were most strongly and positively related to the perceptions of ecosystem services, but the weakest to the basic materials for a good life.
(4)Efforts, such as promoting regional industrial development, creating diverse job opportunities, and enhancing residents' perception of ecosystem services contributed to improving the freedom of choice and action dimension of well-being.
The study can provide a scientific basis for policy formulation of improving residents' well-being and rural revitalization in dry valleys of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.

参考文献/References:

[1] 杨勤业, 郑度, 刘燕华. 横断山地区干旱河谷的自然特点及其开发利用[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 1988, 2(2): 17-24. [YANG Qinye, ZHENG Du, LIU Yanhua. Physico-gepgraphical feature and economic development of the dry valleys in the Hengduan Mountains, southwest China [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 1988, 2(2): 17-24] DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.1988.02.003
[2] 明庆忠, 史正涛. 三江并流区干热河谷成因新探析[J]. 中国沙漠, 2007, 27(1): 99-104. [MING Qingzhong, SHI Zhengtao. New discussion on dry valley formation in the three parallel rivers region [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2007, 27(1): 99-104] DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-694X.2007.01.023
[3] 张雪芹, 徐晓明, 李想, 等. 横断山地区气候-植被区划[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2024, 54(3): 771-787. [ZHANG Xueqin, XU Xiaoming, LI Xiang, et al. A new scheme of climate-vegetation regionalization in the Hengduan Mountains Region [J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2024, 54(3): 751-768] DOI: 10.1360/SSTe-2023-0110
[4] 庞学勇, 包维楷, 吴宁. 岷江上游干旱河谷气候特征及成因[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(S1): 46-53. [PANG Xueyong, BAO Weikai, WU Ning. Reasons of dry valley climate characteristic and its formation reason in upstream of Minjiang River [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2008, 17(S1): 46-53] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8227.2008.z1.009
[5] 张军, 倪绍祥, 于文静, 等. 三江并流区居民点空间分布规律[J]. 山地学报, 2003, 21(1): 121-125. [ZHANG Jun, NI Shaoxiang, YU Wenjing, et al. A quantative study on the spatial distribution pattern of human settlement in three river paralleled running region [J]. Mountain Research, 2003, 21(1): 121-125] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2003.01.020
[6] 新华社. 中共中央国务院关于学习运用“千村示范、万村整治”工程经验有力有效推进乡村全面振兴的意见[EB/OL]. [2024- 02- 03](2024- 07- 04). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202402/content_6929934.htm. [Xinhua News Agency. Opinions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council on learning and using the experience of the "Thousand Villages Demonstration and Ten Thousand Villages Renovation" project to effectively and effectively promote the comprehensive revitalization of the countryside [EB/OL]. [2024- 02- 03](2024- 07- 04). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202402/content_6929934.htm.]
[7] 黄甘霖, 姜亚琼, 刘志锋, 等. 人类福祉研究进展——基于可持续科学视角[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(23): 7519-7527. [HUANG Ganlin, JIANG Yaqiong, LIU Zhifeng, et al. Advances in human well-being research: A sustainability science perspective [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(23): 7519-7527] DOI: 10.5846/stxb201511172326
[8] STONE A A, KRUEGER A B. Understanding subjective well-being [G]//STIGLITZ J E, FITOUSSI J P, DURAND M. For good measure: Advancing research on well-being metrics beyond GDP. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Publishing, 2018: 163-202. DOI: 10.1787/9789264307278-9-en
[9] COSTANZA R, FISHER B, ALI S, et al. Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being [J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61: 267-276. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.023
[10] DIENER E, SUH E. Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators [J]. Social Indicators Research, 1997, 40: 189-216. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006859511756
[11] FORGEARD M J C, JAYAWICKREME E, KERN M L, et al. Doing the right thing: Measuring well-being for public policy [J]. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2011, 1(1): 79-106. DOI: 10.5502/ijw.v1i1.15
[12] AGUADO M, GONZALEZ J A, BELLOTT K S, et al. Exploring subjective well-being and ecosystem services perception along a rural-urban gradient in the high Andes of Ecuador [J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 34: 1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.09.002
[13] PROCTOR J D. The social construction of nature: Relativist accusations, pragmatist and critical realist responses. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1998, 88(3): 352-376. DOI: 10.1111/0004-5608.00105
[14] 张宇硕, 刘博宇, 毕旭, 等. 基于利益相关者感知视角的生态系统服务研究进展[J].自然资源学报, 2023, 38(5): 1300-1317. [ZHANG Yushuo, LIU Boyu, BI Xu, et al. Research progress of ecosystem services based on stakeholder's perception [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(5): 1300-1317] DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20230512
[15] YANG Siqi, ZHAO Wenwu, PEREIRA P, et al. Socio-cultural valuation of rural and urban perception on ecosystem services and human well-being in Yanhe watershed of China [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 251: 109615. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109615
[16] 申津羽, 韩笑, 侯一蕾, 等. 贫困山区的农户主观福祉影响因素研究——以湖南省湘西州为例[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(10): 2174-2182. [SHEN Jinyu, HAN Xiao, HOU Yilei, et al. Subjective well-being of households in rural poverty regions in Xiangxi, Hunan Province [J]. Resources Science, 2014, 36(10): 2174-2182]
[17] 刘迪, 陈海, 张杰, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区村域客观福祉评估及其对农民主观福祉的影响——以陕西省米脂县为例[J]. 地理科学, 2023, 43(3): 530-540. [LIU Di, CHEN Hai, ZHANG Jie, et al. Village's objective well-being assessment and its impact on farmer's subjective well-being in the loess hilly and gully region: A case study of Mizhi County, Shaanxi Province, China [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2023, 43(3): 530-540] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2023.03.015
[18] WANG Bojie, TANG Haiping, XU Ying. Integrating ecosystem services and human well-being into management practices: Insights from a mountain-basin area [J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 27: 58-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.018
[19] 李佳桐, 唐海萍, 邝佛缘. 国家公园生态系统服务与农牧户福祉的时空耦合分析——以祁连山国家公园为例[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(15): 6527-6539. [LI Jiatong, TANG Haiping, KUANG Foyuan. Spatial-temporal coupling analysis of ecosystem service and well-being of farmers and herdsmen: A case study of Qilian Mountain National Park [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(15): 6527-6539] DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.202310072154
[20] 熊鹰, 侯珂伦, 郑偲睿, 等. 基于结构方程模型的南方丘陵山地农户福祉与生态系统服务关系——以广东省乐昌市为例[J]. 热带地理, 2020, 40(5): 843-855. [XIONG Ying, HOU Kelun, ZHENG Sirui, et al. Relationship between farmer's well-being and ecosystem services in hilly and mountainous areas of south China based on structural equation model: A case study of Lechang in Guangdong Province [J]. Tropical Geography, 2020, 40(5): 843-855] DOI: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003266
[21] MA Li, QIN Yueting, ZHANG Han, et al. Improving well-being of farmers using ecological awareness around protected areas: Evidence from Qinling region, China [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18: 9792. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18189792
[22] WANG Ying, SUN Jialiang, LIU Chongchong, et al. Exploring the nexus between perceived ecosystem services and well-being of rural residents in a mountainous area, China [J]. Applied Geography, 2024, 164: 103215. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103215
[23] ZHOU Yuchen, HUANG Qingxu, HE Chunyang, et al. A bibliographic review of the relationship between ecosystem services and human well-being [J/OL]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2024 [2024- 07-30]. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-04791-3
[24] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis [M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 2005: 39-63.
[25] ZHANG Linhao, TANG Haiping, SHI Peijun, et al. Geographically and ontologically oriented scoping of a dry valley and its spatial characteristics analysis: The case of the three parallel rivers region [J]. Land, 2023, 12(6): 1235. DOI: 10.3390/land12061235
[26] 何永彬, 卢培泽, 朱彤. 横断山——云南高原干热河谷形成原因研究[J]. 资源科学, 2000, 22(5): 69-72. [HE Yongbin, LU Peize, ZHU Tong. Causes for the formation of dry-hot valleys in Hengduan Mountain-Yunan Plateau [J]. Resources Science, 2000, 22(5): 69-72] DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2000.05.016
[27] SELUCHI M E, NORTE F A, SATYAMURTY P, et al. Analysis of three situations of the Foehn effect over the Andes(Zonda Wind)using the Eta-CPTEC regional model [J]. Weather Forecast, 2003, 18: 481-501. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0434(2003)18<481:AOTSOT>2.0.CO; 2
[28] WU Renji, TANG Haiping, LU Yunjing. Exploring subjective well-being and ecosystem services perception in the agro-pastoral ecotone of northern China [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 318: 115591. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115591
[29] 范如国, 张宏娟. 民生福祉评价模型及增进策略——基于信度、结构效度分析和结构方程模型[J]. 经济管理, 2012, 34(9): 161-169. [FAN Ruguo, ZHANG Hongjuan. A study on evaluation model and improvement strategies of people's livelihood and well-being—based on reliability, construct validity analysis and structural equation modeling [J]. Business and Management Journal, 2012, 34(9): 161-169] DOI: 10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2012.09.018
[30] KING M F, RENO V F, NOVO E M L M. The concept, dimensions and methods of assessment of human well-being within a socioecological context: A literature review [J]. Social Indicators Research, 2014, 116(3): 681-698. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-013-0320-0
[31] HAQ R. Measuring human wellbeing in Pakistan: Objective versus subjective indicators [J]. European Journal of Social Sciences, 2009, 9(3): 516-532.
[32] CUMMINS R A, ECKERSLEY R, PALLANT J, et al. Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian unity wellbeing index [J]. Social Indicators Research, 2003, 64(2): 159-190. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024704320683
[33] 王博杰, 唐海萍. 人类福祉及其在生态学研究中的应用与展望[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(5): 697-702. [WANG Bojie, TANG Haiping. Human well-being and its applications and prospects in ecology [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2016, 32(5): 697-702] DOI: 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2016.05.002
[34] 梁秀琴, 冯强, 段宝玲. 晋西黄土高原矿区生态系统服务福祉效应研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2023, 30(4): 431-437. [LIANG Xiuqin, FENG Qiang, DUAN Baoling. Research on well-being effect of ecosystem services in Mining area of western Shanxi Loess Plateau [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 30(4): 431-437] DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.040
[35] 种媛. 民族幸福感的跨文化研究——以大夏河流域汉族、回族和藏族为视点[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2016: 102-109. [ZHONG Yuan. A cross-cultural research on the ethnic well-being——in the viewpoint of Han, Hui and Tibetan along the Daxia River [D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2016: 102-109]
[36] SEN S, GUCHHAIT S K. Urban green space in India: Perception of cultural ecosystem services and psychology of situatedness and connectedness [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 123: 107338. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107338
[37] WU Jianguo. Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2013, 28: 999-1023. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9
[38] MOHAMMADREZAEI M, CHIZARI M, SADIGHI H, et al. Transition of objective to subjective well-being in evaluation of farmers' quality of life: Utilizing new epistemological approach among Iranian rice farmers [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 22(4): 935-951.
[39] LIU Di, WANG Qifei, LU Yayan, et al. The impact of individual capabilities on ecosystem services and farmers' well-being: A case study of the Loess Plateau, China [J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16(9): 3715. DOI: 10.3390/su16093715
[40] VOUKELATOU V, GABRIELLI L, MILIOU I, et al. Measuring objective and subjective well-being: Dimensions and data sources [J]. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 2021, 11: 279-309. DOI: 10.1007/s41060-020-00224-2

相似文献/References:

[1]欧光龙,彭明春,王崇云,等.三江并流区云南贡山片植被景观类型分布特征[J].山地学报,2013,(04):464.
　OU Guanglong,PENG Mingchun,WANG Chongyun,et al.Distribution of Vegetation Landscape in Gongshan County of Yunnan Province，the Core Area of the Three Parallel Rivers Belt[J].Mountain Research,2013,(4):464.
[2]张军,倪绍祥,于文静,等.三江并流区居民点空间分布规律[J].山地学报,2003,(01):121.
[3]陈 斌,李海东*,曹学章,等.基于SPOT-VGT NDVI的雅鲁藏布江流域植被动态变化[J].山地学报,2016,(02):249.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000125]
　CHEN Bin,LI Haidong,CAO Xuezhang,et al.Dynamic Changes in Vegetation Coverage in the Yarlung Zangbo River Basin Based on SPOT-VGT NDVI[J].Mountain Research,2016,(4):249.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000125]
[4]唐志光,王 建,王 欣,等.基于MODIS数据的青藏高原积雪日数提取与时空变化分析[J].山地学报,2017,(03):412.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000237]
　TANG Zhiguang,WANG Jian,WANG Xin,et al.Extraction and Spatiotemporal Analysis of Snow Covered Days over Tibetan Plateau Based on MODIS Data[J].Mountain Research,2017,(4):412.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000237]
[5]张志刚,王 建*,徐孝彬,等.利用宇生核素10Be暴露测年技术重建冰川漂砾运动历史[J].山地学报,2017,(04):590.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000257]
　ZHANG Zhigang,WANG Jian*,XU Xiaobin,et al.Reconstructing Movement History of Glacial Boulders by Using 10Be Exposure Dating Method[J].Mountain Research,2017,(4):590.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000257]
[6]李彩瑛,阎建忠*,花晓波,等.青藏高原“一江两河”地区农牧民家庭生计脆弱性评估[J].山地学报,2018,(06):930.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000388]
　LI Caiying,YAN Jianzhong*,HUA Xiaobo,et al.Household-level Livelihood Vulnerability Assessment in the YNL River Region of the Tibetan Plateau, China[J].Mountain Research,2018,(4):930.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000388]
[7]朱 钰,刘时银*,易 颖,等.“三江并流区”水储量的时空变化特征及其对ENSO的响应[J].山地学报,2020,(2):165.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000499]
　ZHU Yu,LIU Shiyin*,YI Ying,et al.Spatiotemporal Changes of Terrestrial Water Storage in Three Parallel River Basins and Its Response to ENSO[J].Mountain Research,2020,(4):165.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000499]
[8]李 阳,王根绪,芮鹏飞,等.裸斑对青藏高原多年冻土区高寒草甸生态系统呼吸和甲烷吸收的影响[J].山地学报,2020,(2):190.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000501]
　LI Yang,WANG Genxu,RUI Pengfei,et al.Effects of Bare Patches on Ecosystem Respiration and Methane Uptake of Alpine Meadow in a Permafrost Region of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J].Mountain Research,2020,(4):190.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000501]
[9]徐凌星,杨德伟*,刘丹丹,等.青藏高原生态系统服务的时空分布特征与供需关系[J].山地学报,2020,(4):483.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000527]
　XU Lingxing,YANG Dewei,et al.Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics and Supply-Demand Relationships of Ecosystem Services on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China[J].Mountain Research,2020,(4):483.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000527]
[10]何坤龙,刘晓辉,刘 蛟*,等.不同偏差校正方法对青藏高原地区GPM的应用效果研究[J].山地学报,2021,(3):439.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000609]
　HE Kunlong,LIU Xiaohui,LIU Jiao*,et al.Performances of Different Deviation Calibration Methods on GPM in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China[J].Mountain Research,2021,(4):439.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000609]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2024- 03-28; 改回日期(Accepted date): 2024- 08-16
基金项目(Foundation item): 第二次青藏高原综合考察研究项目(2019QZKK0606)。[The Second Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program(2019QZKK0606)]
作者简介(Biography): 祖悦晴( 2000-),女,北京人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向: 生态系统服务与人类福祉。[ZU Yueqing(2000-), female, born in Beijing, M.Sc. candidate, research on ecosystem services and human well-being] E-mail: 202221051154@mail.bnu.edu.cn
*通讯作者(Corresponding author): 唐海萍(1971-),女,博士,教授,主要研究方向:全球变化与陆地生态系统响应、生态系统管理。[TANG Haiping(1971-), female, Ph.D., professor, research on global change and terrestrial ecosystem responses, and ecosystem management]E-mail: tanghp@bnu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-07-30