[1]张永峰a,b,c,等.民系视角下的福建省乡村聚落空间格局演化及特征[J].山地学报,2023,(5):701-715.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000781]
　ZHANG Yongfenga,b,c,et al.Spatial Evolution of Rural Settlements in Fujian Province of China from a Perspective of Folk Group Division[J].Mountain Research,2023,(5):701-715.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000781]
点击复制

民系视角下的福建省乡村聚落空间格局演化及特征
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2023年第5期
页码:
701-715
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2023-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Spatial Evolution of Rural Settlements in Fujian Province of China from a Perspective of Folk Group Division
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2023)5-701-15
作者:
张永峰a; b; c; 戴文远a; b; c*; 黄万里a; b; c; 王少飞a; b; c
(福建师范大学 a. 地理研究所; b. 湿润亚热带生态地理过程教育部重点实验室; c. 地理科学学院,福州 350007)
Author(s):
ZHANG Yongfenga; b; c;  DAI Wenyuana; b; c*;  HUANG Wanlia; b; c;  WANG Shaofeia; b; c
(a. Institute of Geography; b. Key Laboratory of Moist Subtropical Ecogeographical Processes,Ministry of Education; c. School of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China)
关键词:
民系;  乡村聚落;  景观格局指数;  时空格局;  演化机制;  福建省
Keywords:
folk group;  rural settlement;  landscape pattern index;  spatial and temporal pattern;  evolutionary mechanism;  Fujian;  China
分类号:
K901.8
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000781
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
福建省不同民系地域乡村聚落具有鲜明的地方特色和丰富的文化内涵,但快速城镇化进程导致不同民系乡村聚落及地方文化特色衰退甚至消亡。相关研究较少从人文地理视角分析乡村聚落演化,不能全面揭示多元地域文化下乡村聚落空间的演化特征和规律。本文采用GIS空间分析、景观格局指数等方法,分析1990—2020年福建不同民系乡村聚落规模、形态和空间演变特征,揭示乡村聚落空间格局形成的影响因素。结果表明:(1)1990—2020 年,福建乡村聚落用地规模总体呈增加趋势,特别是2010—2020年乡村聚落规模扩张最为迅速,但聚落斑块数量呈现下降趋势。(2)30 a间不同民系乡村聚落形态趋于复杂化,其中闽南民系区乡村聚落的形状最为复杂,闽东民系区乡村聚落形态复杂度有所降低; 聚落破碎度则整体表现为内陆民系区大于沿海民系区。(3)地形、坡度等自然因素为福建省不同民系乡村聚落空间格局的形成奠定了基础,但30 a间不同民系乡村聚落受河流、交通、距县城中心距离等区位因素影响日益明显,距道路不同缓冲距离的乡村聚落具有W型分布特征; 距河流不同缓冲距离的乡村聚落具有U型分布特征。(4)30 a间不同民系乡村聚落用地空间格局处于差异发展期,乡村聚落密度呈V型空间结构特征; 沿海的闽东民系区东部、莆仙民系区、闽南民系区东部形成乡村聚落高密度带状集聚区,客家民系区次之,闽中、闽北民系区处于低密度区。研究结果可为不同民系传承与保护乡村聚落地方文化及特色提供科学依据。
Abstract:
Folk groups with distinctive local characteristics and rich cultural connotation feature in rural settlements in Fujian province, China; however, rapid urbanization in rural areas had led to the decline and even disappearance of local culture and characteristics for the rural settlements for past thirty years. There were little research on the evolution of rural settlements from a humanistic geographical perspective, which cannot entirely interpreted the evolution and laws of rural settlement space in the context of multiple geographical cultures.
In this study, the land-use level and spatial evolution of rural settlements zoned by folk group divisions in the period of 1990 to 2020 in Fujian province, China were analyzed by GIS spatial analysis, landscape pattern index, and other methods, and then it revealed the influencing factors affecting the formation of rural settlement spatial pattern.
It found the following results.(1)From 1990 to 2020, the land areas of rural settlements in Fujian province increased overall; especially from 2010 to 2020, the rate of expansion in land use of rural settlements was the fastest, whereas the number of settlement patches showed a downward trend.(2)For the past 30 years, there was a general tendency toward more complicated settlements patterns along with different folk groups, among which rural settlements in Minnan(Southern Fujian)folk group had the most complex layouts, whereas in Mindong(Eastern Fujian)folk group it decreased to some extent. The landscape complexity level of inland folk group was higher than that of coastal folk group.(3)Natural factors such as topography, slope etc. laid a solid foundation for rural settlement spatial formations in different folk group regions; nevertheless, in the past 30 years, rural settlement spatial formations appeared to be more subject to location factors such as rivers, transportation, and distance from downtown. Rural settlements with different buffer distances from roads had a W-shaped pattern, while those with different buffer distances from rivers had a U-shaped distribution characteristics.(4)The spatial patterns of rural settlement lands were in a phase of differential development and the spatial structure of rural settlement density described a V-shaped feature. Rural settlements in the coastal areas of eastern Mindong folk group, Puxian(Putian city)folk group, and eastern Minnan folk group formed a cluster of the most high-density strip-shape array, then followed by Hakka folk group. The Minzhong(central Fujian)and Minbei(northern Fujian)folk groups were in low-density distribution.
This research can provide a scientific basis for the inheritance and protection of local culture and characteristics of rural settlements with different folk groups.

参考文献/References:

[1] 罗可群. 广东客家文学史[M]. 广州: 广东人民出版社, 2015: 12-15.[LUO Kequn. History of Guangdong Hakka literature [M]. Guangzhou: Guangdong People's Publishing House, 2015: 12-15]
[2] 高宸宇, 李久君. 民系背景下的传统民居比较研究——以赣中传统民居与闽北传统民居为例[J]. 建筑与文化, 2021(11): 240-242. [GAO Chenyu, LI Jiujun. A comparative study of traditional houses under the background of subethnic groups: Taking traditional houses in central Jiangxi and northern Fujian as examples[J]. Architecture and Culture, 2021(11): 240-242]DOI: 10.19875/j.cnki.jzywh.2021.11.090
[3] 杨希, 马航, 张力智, 等. 迁徙中的承袭、交融与分异: 广东客家建筑与聚落形态时空发展解析[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(4): 958-976. [YANG Xi, MA Hang, ZHANG Lizhi, et al. Inheritance, fusion, and variation during migration: An analysis of spatio-temporal morphological development of traditional Guangdong Hakka architecture and settlements[J]. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(4): 958-976]DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020200282
[4] 卓晓岚, 陶金, 肖大威. 基于全域调查的赣闽粤客家地区传统村落类型体系构建和空间分布格局研究[J]. 小城镇建设, 2020, 38(10): 47-55. [ZHUO Xiaolan, TAO Jin, XIAO Dawei. Study on the morphotype and distribution pattern of Hakka traditional villages in the border area of Jiangxi, Fujian and Guangdong based on a universal survey[J]. Development of Small Cities and Towns, 2020, 38(10): 47-55]DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1483.2020.10.007
[5] 周扬, 黄晗, 刘彦随. 中国村庄空间分布规律及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(10): 2206-2223. [ZHOU Yang, HUANG Han, LIU Yansui. The spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of Chinese villages[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(10): 2206-2223]DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202010012
[6] 潘莹, 蔡梦凡, 施瑛. 基于语言分区的海南岛民族民系传统聚落景观特征分析[J]. 中国园林, 2020, 36(12): 41-46. [PAN Ying, CAI Mengfan, SHI Ying. The analysis of the characteristics of traditional settlement landscape of Hainan island ethnic group based on language zone[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2020, 36(12): 41-46]DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2020.12.0041
[7] WILLEMEN L, HEIN L, MARTINUS E F, et al. Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2010, 10(1): 62-73.DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.02.015
[8] GORBENKOVA E, SHCHERBINA E. Historical-genetic features in rural settlement system: A case study from Mogilev District(Mogilev Oblast, Belarus)[J]. Land, 2020, 9(5): 165. DOI: 10.3390/land9050165
[9] 李红波, 张小林. 国外乡村聚落地理研究进展及近今趋势[J]. 人文地理, 2012, 27(4): 103-108. [LI Hongbo, ZHANG Xiaolin. A review and trend on rural settlement geography abroad[J]. Human Geography, 2012, 27(4): 103-108]DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2012.04.027
[10] TORREGGIANI D, LUDWICZAK Z, DALL'ARA E, et al. TRuLAn: A high-resolution method for multi-time analysis of traditional rural landscapes and its application in Emilia-Romagna, Italy[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 124: 93-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.011
[11] QU Yanbo, JIANG Guanghui, YANG Yuting, et al. Multi-scale analysis on spatial morphology differentiation and formation mechanism of rural residential land: A case study in Shandong province, China[J]. Habitat International, 2018, 71: 135-146.DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.11.011
[12] 田达睿, 徐嘉闻, 谭静斌. 黄土丘陵沟壑区聚落形态的组织机制与模拟演化研究—以陕北米脂县东沟为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2023, 37(2): 103-111. [TIAN Darui, XU Jiawen, TAN Jingbin. Organization mechanism of settlement morphology in hilly-gully loess regionand its evolution simulation: Case study of Donggou, Mizhi county, northern Shaanxi province[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2023, 37(2): 103-111]DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2023.040
[13] 李伯华, 周璐, 窦银娣, 等. 基于乡村多功能理论的少数民族传统聚落景观风貌演化特征及影响机制研究—以湖南怀化皇都村为例[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(8): 1433-1445. [LI Bohua, ZHOU Lu, DOU Yindi,et al. Evolution characteristics and influence mechanism of ethnic traditionalsettlement landscape based on rural multifunctional theory: A case study of Huangdu village in Huaihua city, Hunan[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2022, 42(8): 1433-1445]DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2022.08.011
[14] 朱晓翔, 朱纪广, 乔家君. 国内乡村聚落研究进展与展望[J]. 人文地理, 2016, 31(1): 33-41. [ZHU Xiaoxiang, ZHU Jiguang, QIAO Jiajun. Research progress and prospect on Chinese rural settlements[J]. Human Geography, 2016, 31(1): 33-41]DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2016.01.005
[15] 高丽, 李红波, 张小林. 中国乡村生活空间研究溯源及展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 660-669. [GAO Li, LI Hongbo, ZHANG Xiaolin. Historical development and prospect of rural living space research in China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(4): 660-669]DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.04.013
[16] 王丹, 刘祖云. 国外乡村空间研究的进展与启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(12): 1991-2002. [WANG Dan, LIU Zuyun. Progress and implications of international rural space research[J]. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(12): 1991-2002]DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.12.014
[17] 邹存铭, 房艳刚, 袁庆学. 半干旱贫困地区乡村聚落空间演变与易地扶贫搬迁重构效应—以吉林省通榆县为例[J]. 经济地理, 2022, 42(4): 27-33. [ZOU Cunming, FANG Yangang, YUAN Qingxue. Spatial evolution of rural settlements in semi-arid and poverty-stricken areaand their restructuring effects by poverty alleviation and relocation:A case study of Tongyu county in Jilin province[J]. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(4): 27-33]DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.04.004
[18] 李旭芳, 沈伟棠, 翁飞帆, 等. 福建省乡土聚落的空间分布及其驱动机制[J]. 风景园林, 2023, 30(6): 121-129. [LI Xufang, SHEN Weitang, WENG Feifan, et al. Spatial distribution of vernacular settlements in Fujian province and driving mechanism thereof [J]. Landscape Architecture, 2023, 30(6): 121-129]DOI: 10.12409/j.fjyl.202208190499
[19] 刘淑虎, 樊海强, 王艳虎, 等. 闽江流域传统村落空间特征及相关性分析[J]. 现代城市研究, 2019(9): 17-25. [LIU Shuhu, FAN Haiqiang, WANG Yanhu, et al. Analysis on the spatial distribution characteristics and correlation of traditional villages in the Minjiang River basin[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2019(9): 17-25]DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2019.09.003
[20] 梁发超, 刘诗苑, 起晓星, 等. 近30年闽南沿海乡村聚落用地空间演化过程研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(22): 18-26. [LIANG Fachao, LIU Shiyuan, QI Xiaoxing, et al. Spatial evolution process of rural settlement land in coastal areas of southern Fujian in recent 30 years[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(22): 18-26]DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.22.003
[21] 余兆武, 肖黎姗, 郭青海, 等. 城镇化过程中福建省山区县农村聚落景观格局变化特征[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(10): 3021-3031. [YU Zhaowu, XIAO Lishan, GUO Qinghai, et al. Mountain county rural settlement landscape pattern change and spatial characteristics in rapid mountain urbanization process in Fujian province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(10): 3021-3031] DOI: 10.5846/stxb201410302126
[22] 胡航箫, 戴文远, 陈娟, 等. 基于集聚与生态价值组合特征的乡村聚落重构——以福州山区为例[J]. 山地学报, 2020, 38(1): 142-151. [HU Hangxiao, DAI Wenyuan, CHEN Juan, et al. A physiology of space reconstruction of rural settlements based oncomposite features of agglomeration effect and ecological effects-a case study of mountainous area of Fuzhou, China[J]. Mountain Research, 2020, 38(1): 142-151]DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000498
[23] 杨凯悦, 宋永永, 薛东前. 黄土高原乡村聚落用地时空演变与影响因素[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(7): 1311-1324. [YANG Kaiyue, SONG Yongyong, XUE Dongqian. Spatiotemporal change of rural settlement land in the Loess Plateau and influencing factors[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(7): 1311-1324]DOI: 10.18402/resci.2020.07.08
[24] 李阳兵, 刘亚香, 罗光杰. 贵州中部峰丛洼地区乡村聚落演化多元路径研究——以普定后寨河聚落为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(1): 99-113. [LI Yangbing, LIU Yaxiang, LUO Guangjie. The multiple paths of the rural settlement evolution in the peak-cluster-depression area of central Guizhou province: A case study in Houzhaihe, Puding county[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(1): 99-113]DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20161309
[25] 杨忍, 陈燕纯. 中国乡村地理学研究的主要热点演化及展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5): 601-616. [YANG Ren, CHEN Yanchun. Change in key research area and prospect of Chinese rural geography[J]. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(5): 601-616]DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.05.004
[26] 孔雪松, 朱芷晴, 刘殿锋. 江苏省乡村聚落演化的多尺度特征与空间关联性分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(12): 247-256. [KONG Xuesong, ZHU Zhiqing, LIU Dianfeng. Multi-scale evolution characteristics of rural settlements and spatial correlation in Jiangsu province, China [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(12): 247-256]DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.12.030
[27] 黄亚平, 郑有旭. 江汉平原乡村聚落形态类型及空间体系特征[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 121-128. [HUANG Yaping, ZHENG Youxu. The rural settlement morphological types and spatial system characteristics in the Jianghan Plain[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(1): 121-128]DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.01.013
[28] 陈支平. 福建六大民系[M]. 福州: 福建人民出版社, 2000: 72-123, 262-263.[CHEN Zhiping. The six folk systems of Fujian [M]. Fuzhou: Fujian People's Publishing House, 2000: 72-123, 262-263]
[29] 戴志坚. 福建民居[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009: 3-8, 27-40.[DAI Zhijian. Fujian folk houses [M]. Beijing: China Construction Industry Press, 2009: 3-8, 27-40]
[30] 陶金源, 张孟楠, 徐磊, 等. 基于GIS的环京津贫困带乡村聚落时空分异及影响因素分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(6): 300-307. [TAO Jinyuan, ZHANG Mengnan, XU Lei, et al. Analysis of spatial differentiation of rural settlements and its effect mechanisms based on GIS in the poverty belt around Beijing and Tianjin[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(6): 300-307]DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2020.06.040
[31] 寇相玮, 李伟芳, 姜文达, 等.宁波四明山区农村聚落空间格局及影响因素[J]. 山地学报, 2018, 36(5): 784-791. [KOU Xiangwei, LI Weifang, JIANG Wenda, et al. Spatial pattern and influence factors of rural settlements: A case of Siming mountain area in Ningbo city[J]. Mountain Research, 2018, 36(5): 784-791]DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000374
[32] 马晓冬, 李全林, 沈一.江苏省乡村聚落的形态分异及地域类型[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(4): 516-525. [MA Xiaodong, LI Quanlin, SHEN Yi. Morphological difference and regional types of rural settlements in Jiangsu province[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(4): 516-525] DOI: 10.11821/xb201204008
[33] 郑群明, 周聪聪. 中国省域森林公园旅游接待人数空间分异研究——基于空间自相关分析方法[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 14(6): 96-104. [ZHENG Qunming, ZHOU Congcong. Spatial differentiation of tourist reception number in China provincial forest park: Based on spatial autocorrelation analysis[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry and Technology(Social Sciences), 2020, 14(6): 96-104]DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-9272.2020.06.013
[34] 赵伟, 董晓庆, 张智红. 基于冷热点分析的农村宅基地整理潜力及模式研究——以重庆市南川区为例[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 47(2): 63-71. [ZHAO Wei, DONG Xiaoqing, ZHANG Zhihong. On potential and model of rural residential lands consolidation based on cold-hot spot analysis[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2022, 47(2): 63-71]DOI: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2022.02.012
[35] 卢健. 基于空间热点与聚类区域空间自相关分析方法的乡域单元耕层地理资源评价研究[J]. 无线互联科技, 2019, 16(19): 131-132. [LU Jian. Study on evaluation of land resources in rural unit tillage based on spatial autocorrelation analysis method of spatial hotspots and clustering areas[J]. Wireless Internet Technology, 2019, 16(19): 131-132]
[36] 纪惠文, 查小春. 秦岭东部乡村聚落空间演变特征及其影响因素研究:以商洛市丹凤县为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2022, 38(1): 32-42. [JI Huiwen, ZHA Xiaochun. Spatial evolution characteristics and influencing factors of rural settlement in eastern Qinling mountains: A case study of Danfeng county in Shangluo city, China[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2022, 38(1): 32-42]DOI: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2021.0294
[37] 陈加兵, 李慧, 陈文惠, 等.基于DEM与DLG的福建省地貌形态自动分类[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2013, 15(1): 75-80. [CHEN Jiabing, LI Hui, CHEN Wenhui, et al. Auto-classification of geomorphology types based on DLG and DEM for Fujian province[J]. Journal of Geoinformation Science, 2013, 15(1): 75-80]DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2013.00075
[38] 林华东.闽语的形成及其与福建民系族群的关系[J].东南学术, 2004(S1): 208-212. [LIN Huadong. The formation of the Min language and its relationship with Fujianfolk groups[J]. Southeast Academic Research, 2004(S1): 208-212]DOI: 10.13658/j.cnki.sar.2004.s1.054
[39] 任翔宇. 闽东方言的形成:地理与历史因素的交汇[J].哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报, 2022, 12(2): 91-95. [REN Xiangyu. The formation of Mindong dialect: The intersection ofgeographical and historical factors[J]. Journal of Social Science of Harbin Normal University, 2022, 12(2): 91-95] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0292.2022.02.018
[40] 陈支平. 兴化人─福建汉族民系研究之三[J]. 广西民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 1998, 20(4): 43-46. [CHEN Zhiping. Xinghua People-a study of the Han ethnic groups in Fujian No.3[J]. Journal of Guangxi University for Nationalities(Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 1998, 20(4): 43-46]
[41] 陈支平. 闽南人—福建汉族民系研究之二[J]. 广西民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 1998, 20(3): 63-66. [CHEN Zhiping. Minnan People-a study of the Han Chinese folk groups in Fujian No.2[J]. Journal of Guangxi Universityfor Nationalities(Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 1998, 20(3): 63-66]
[42] 谢重光. 南宋中后期客家民系的初步形成[J]. 地域文化研究, 2022(4): 98-106. [XIE Chongguang. Initial formation of Hakka folk in the middle to late Southern Song dynasty[J]. Regional Culture Study, 2022(4): 98-106]

相似文献/References:

[1]马晓蓉,查小春*.秦巴山区乡村聚落空间格局演变及影响因子——以陕西宁强县为例[J].山地学报,2020,(5):726.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000550]
　MA Xiaorong,ZHA Xiaochun*.Spatial Structure Evolvement and Impact Factors of Rural Settlementsin the Qinba Mountain Area: A Case Study of Ningqiang County in Shaanxi Province, China[J].Mountain Research,2020,(5):726.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000550]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2022-12-25; 改回日期(Accepted date): 2023-10-18
基金项目(Foundation item): 国家自然科学基金(41971261); 福建省科技厅公益类项目(2021R1002003); 福建省自然科学基金(2018J01741)。[National Natural Science Foundation of China(41971261); Public Welfare Project of Fujian Science and Technology Department(2021R1002003); Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province(2018J01741)]
作者简介(Biography): 张永峰(1998-),男,宁夏固原人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:城市与区域规划。[ZHANG Yongfeng(1998-), male, born in Guyuan, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, M.Sc. candidate, research on urban and regional planning] E-mail: 1825879871@qq.com
*通讯作者(Corresponding author): 戴文远(1972-),男,副教授,主要研究方向:土地利用与乡村发展。[DAI Wenyuan(1972-), male, associate professor, research on land use and rural development] E-mail: dwygeo@fjnu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-09-30