[1]马娟娟a,李晓兵a*,齐 鹏a,等.祁连山国家公园生态安全评价[J].山地学报,2022,(4):504-515.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000689]
　MA Juanjuana,LI Xiaobinga*,QI Penga,et al.Ecological Security Assessment of Qilian Mountain National Park of China[J].Mountain Research,2022,(4):504-515.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000689]
点击复制

祁连山国家公园生态安全评价
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2022年第4期
页码:
504-515
栏目:
山地环境
出版日期:
2022-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Ecological Security Assessment of Qilian Mountain National Park of China
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2022)4-504-12
作者:
马娟娟1a; 李晓兵1a; 2*; 齐 鹏1a; 张耀全1b
1. 甘肃农业大学 a.资源与环境学院; b.林学院,兰州 730070; 2. 国家林草局驻西安专员办,兰州 730030
Author(s):
MA Juanjuan1a;  LI Xiaobing1a; 2*;  QI Peng1a;  ZHANG Yaoquan1b
1. a. Resource and Environmental Faculty; b. Faculty of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2. Commissioner's Office of the State Forestry and Grass Administration in Xi'an, Lanzhou 730030, China
关键词:
生态安全评价;  熵权法;  模糊综合评价法;  祁连山国家公园
Keywords:
ecological security assessment;  entropy weight method;  fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method;  Qilian Mountains National Park
分类号:
S759.9
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000689
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
国家公园生态安全评价不仅可以探索被评价区域的生态环境状况,还可以明确区域生态演变趋势,为当地相关部门预防和控制生态环境恶化提供科学建议。祁连山国家公园是中国西部重要的生态安全屏障、黄河流域重要水源产流地及生物多样性优先保护区域。目前,对祁连山国家公园的生态安全评价多以PSR模型为基础,运用主观确权法和综合指数法进行评价,忽略了生态系统及其功能本身与生态安全之间的内在联系,其结果缺乏客观实际性。本研究将生态系统服务功能指标列入生态安全评价体系当中,从自然资源条件和生态状况两方面选取20个指标构建评价体系,对祁连山国家公园的12个行政区2018年度生态安全进行评价。通过熵权法确定各个指标的权重,用模糊综合评价法计算出不同层次的隶属度,根据障碍度模型确定影响祁连山国家公园生态安全的主要障碍因子。结果表明:(1)祁连山国家公园由东向西生态安全等级呈逐渐下降趋势,生态安全指数从3.57(天祝县)降到1.97(阿克塞);(2)天祝县、门源县、祁连县、凉州区的生态安全等级为安全,永昌县和民乐县为临界安全,肃南县为较不安全,山丹马场、肃北县、天峻县、阿克塞县、德令哈市为不安全;(3)影响祁连山国家公园生态安全的主要障碍因子有森林覆盖率、叶面积指数和载畜力,其平均障碍度分别为11.07%、9.70%、8.39%。研究结果可为优化祁连山国家公园管理制度和生态保护措施的制定提供理论依据。
Abstract:
Assessment on the ecological security of a national park in China facilitate defining the ecological environment on a reginal scale and its evolution trend, and it is beneficial to actions guided by local government to prevention and control of deterioration of regional ecological environment.
Qilian Mountain National Park was constituted with a purpose of building up a fundamental ecological security defense in western China, an original water source of the Yellow River Basin, and a priority area of biodiversity protection.
Most ecological security assessments of Qilian Mountain National Park were performed based on PSR model with Subjective Weight Determination Method and Comprehensive Index Method; however, the internal relationship between ecosystem and its function and ecological security was not included in the assessments, making their conclusion unpractical.
In this study, 12 administrative districts in Qilian Mountain National Park were selected as cases for a proper evaluation of ecological security of the whole Park in 2018. 20 ecosystem service function indicators selected from two aspects of natural resource conditions and ecological conditions were introduced in the ecological security evaluation system. Entropy weight method was used to determine the weight of each index, and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to calculate the membership degree of each level. Then main obstacle factors affecting the ecological security of Qilian Mountain National Park were determined by obstacle degree model.
The following results are listed here:(1)The ecological security level of Qilian Mountain National Park gradually decreased from east to west in the Park, with an obvious drop from 3.57(Tianzhu county)to 1.97(Aksai county)in the ecological safety value.(2)According to Ecological Security Level Standard, it found that combined with the result of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, Tianzhu, Menyuan county, and Liangzhou district were safe, but Yongchang and Minle county at critical in safety, Sunan county at low safe level, and Shandan Machang, Subei county, Tianjun county, Aksai county, and Delingha were judged as unsafe.(3)The main obstacles to ecological security were forest coverage, leaf area index, as well as livestock carrying capacity, with average obstacle degree of 11.07%, 9.70%, and 8.39%, respectively. The conclusions will provide a theoretical basis for optimizing the management policy of Qilian Mountain National Park and formulation of ecological protection measures.

参考文献/References:

[1] HUANG Jianping, YU Haipeng, HAN Dongliang, et al. Declines in global ecological security under climate change [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 117: 106651. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106651
[2] 王根绪, 程国栋, 钱鞠. 生态安全评价研究中的若干问题[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(9):1551-1556. [WANG Genxu, CHENG Guodong, QIAN Ju. Several problems in ecological security assessment research [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, 14(9):1551-1556] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2003.0342
[3] OMAR H, CABRAL P. Ecological risk assessment based on land cover changes: A case of Zanzibar(Tanzania)[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(19): 3114. DOI: 10.3390/rs12193114
[4] 米锋, 谭曾豪迪, 顾艳红, 等. 我国森林生态安全评价及其差异化分析[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(7): 107-115. [MI Feng, TAN Zenghaodi, GU Yanhong, et al. Difference analysis and evaluation of Chinese forest ecological security [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(7): 107-115] DOI: 10.11707 /j.1001-7488.20150712
[5] NICHOLS S J, DYER F J. Contribution of national bioassessment approaches for assessing ecological water security: An AUSRIVAS case study [J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 2013, 7(5): 669-687. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-013-0556-6
[6] SU Shiliang, LI Dan, YU Xiang, et al. Assessing land ecological security in Shanghai(China)based on catastrophe theory [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2011, 25(6): 737-746. DOI: 10.1007/s00477-011-0457-9
[7] HUANG Qianqian, PENG Benhong, WEI Guo, et al. Dynamic assessment and early warning of ecological security: A case study of the Yangtze river urban agglomeration [J]. Natural Hazards, 2020(4): 1-21. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04436-4
[8] SHEN Yuan, CAO Huiming, TANG Mingfang, et al. The human threat to river ecosystems at the watershed scale: An ecological security assessment of the Songhua River Basin, northeast China [J]. Water, 2017, 9(3): 219. DOI: 10.3390/w9030219
[9] 秦鹏, 张志辉, 刘庆. 黄河三角洲滨海湿地生态安全评价[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2020, 41(8):145-153. [QIN Peng, ZHANG Zhihui, LIU Qing. Ecological security assessment of coastal wetland in the Yellow River delta [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2020, 41(8):145-153] DOI: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20200816
[10] LI Xu, LI Xiaobing, WANG Hong, et al. Spatiotemporal assessment of ecological security in a typical steppe ecoregion in Inner Mongolia [J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2018, 27(4): 1601-1617. DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/77034
[11] 蔡秀亭, 姜钰. 中国森林生态安全时空格局演变及其障碍因子诊断[J]. 统计与决策, 2019,35(3): 96-100. [CAI Xiuting, JIANG Yu. Evolution of space-time pattern of Chinese forest ecological security and its obstacle factor diagnosis [J]. Statistics and Decision. 2019, 35(3): 96-100] DOI: 10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2019.03.022
[12] HUANG Jianping, YU Haipeng, HAN Dongliang, et al. Declines in global ecological security under climate change [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 117:106651. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106651
[13] 李玉平, 朱琛, 张璐璇, 等. 基于改进层次分析法的水环境生态安全评价与对策——以邢台市为例[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 55(2): 310-316. [LI Yuping, ZHU Chen, ZHANG Luxuan, et al. Ecological security assessment and countermeasures of water environment based on improved analytic hierarchy process: A case study of Xingtai city [J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2019, 55(2): 310-316] DOI: 10.13209/j.0479-8023.2018.096
[14] CHEN Hanshen. Evaluation and analysis of eco-security in environmentally sensitive areas using an emergy ecological footprint [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017, 14(2): 136. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14020136
[15] LI Xiaobing, TIAN Meirong, WANG Hong, et al. Development of an ecological security evaluation method based on the ecological footprint and application to a typical steppe region in China [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 39:153-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.12.014
[16] 马芳. 祁连山国家公园脆弱生态环境保护与修复的跨区域立法研究[J]. 青海民族研究, 2021, 32(3):116-122. [MA Fang. Research on the cross-regional legislation for the environmental protection and restoration of the fragile ecological environment of Qilian Mountain National Park [J]. Qinghai Journal of Ethnology, 2021, 32(3):116-122] DOI: 10.15899/j.cnki.1005-5681.2021.03.019
[17] 程一凡, 薛亚东, 代云川, 等. 祁连山国家公园青海片区人兽冲突现状与牧民态度认知研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019,39(4):1385-1393. [CHENG Yifan, XUE Yadong, DAI Yunchuan, et al. The research of human-wildlife conflict's current situation and the cognition of herdsmen's attitudes in the Qinghai area of Qilian Mountain National Park [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(4): 1385-1393] DOI: 10.5846 /stxb201808201773
[18] 张强, 冯悦, 魏伟, 等. 基于GIS的祁连山生态敏感性评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2019,19(3):1056-1064. [ZHANG Qiang, FENG Yue,WEI Wei, et al. On ecological sensitivity svaluation of Qilian Mountain range(Qinghai-Gansu)based on GIS [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2019,19(3):1056-1064] DOI: 10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2019.03.045
[19] 刘佳茹, 赵军, 沈思民, 等. 基于SRP概念模型的祁连山地区生态脆弱性评价[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(6):1573-1582. [LIU Jiaru, ZHAO Jun, SHEN Simin, et al. Ecological vulnerability assessment of Qilian Mountains region based on SRP conceptual model [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(6):1573-1582] DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2020.06.19
[20] 付建新, 曹广超, 郭文炯. 祁连山国家公园青海片区山水林田湖草的时空分异[J].应用生态学报, 2021,32(8):2866-2874. [FU Jianxin, CAO Guangchao, GUO Wenjiong. Spatial-temporal differentiation of mountain-water-forest-farmland-lake-grass system in Qinghai area of the Qilian Mountain National Park,China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021,32(8):2866-2874] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202108.015
[21] 王毅, 谢蓉蓉, 王菲凤, 等. 基于Delphi-PSR模型的祁连山国家级自然保护区生态安全评价[J]. 山地学报, 2019, 37(3):328-336. [WANG Yi, XIE Rongrong, WANG Feifeng, et al. Evaluation on eco-security of Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve based on Delphi-PSR model [J]. Mountain Research, 2019, 37(3):328-336] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000426
[22] 唐飞飞. 祁连山国家级自然保护区生态安全评价[D]. 兰州:兰州大学, 2014: 21-28. [TANG Feifei. The evaluation of ecological security in Qilian Shan National Nature Reserve [D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2014: 21-28]
[23] LUO Y, YANG Z J, DONG Y, et al. Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in water quality evaluation [J]. Bulgarian Chemical Communications, 2016, 48:199-204.
[24] 黄宝强, 刘青, 胡振鹏, 等. 生态安全评价研究述评[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(S2):150-156. [HUANG Baoqiang, LIU Qing, HU Zhenpeng, et al. A review on ecological security assessment [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2012, 21(S2):150-156]
[25] 刘红, 王慧, 张兴卫. 生态安全评价研究述评[J]. 生态学杂志, 2006,25(1):74-78. [LIU Hong, WANG Hui, ZHANG Xingwei. Research review on ecological security assessment [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2006, 25(1): 74-78] DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2006.0015
[26] 代云川, 薛亚东, 张云毅, 等. 国家公园生态系统完整性评价研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(1):104-113. [DAI Yunchuan, XUE Yadong, ZHANG Yunyi, et al. Summary comments on assessment methods of ecosystem integrity for national parks [J]. Biodiversity Science, 2019,27(1):104-113] DOI: 10.17520/biods.2018142
[27] 何雄伟, 盛方富. 国家级自然保护区生态预警指标体系构建与生态安全评价——以江西鄱阳湖国家级自然保护区为例[J]. 生态经济, 2021,37(12):190-195. [HE Xiongwei, SHENG Fangfu. Construction of ecological early warning index system of national nature reserve and evaluation of ecological security: Taking Poyang Lake National Nature Reserve in Jiangxi province as an example [J]. Ecological Economy, 2021, 37(12):190-195]
[28] ZHANG Yue, ZHANG Liyuan, YU Kanhua, et al. Analysis of the characteristics of ecological security zoning and its dynamic change pattern: A case study of the Weibei area [J]. Sustainability, 2020, 17(12): 7222. DOI: 10.3390/su1217722
[29] 张亚青, 王相, 孟凡荣, 等. 基于熵权和层次分析法的VOCs处理技术模糊综合评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021,41(6): 2946-2955. [ZHANG Yaqing, WANG Xiang, MENG Fanrong. Comprehensive evaluation of VOCs processing technology based on entropy weight method and analytic hierarchy process [J]. China Environmental Science, 2021,41(6):2946-2955] DOI: 10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.20210222.006
[30] 瞿丽欢. 基于人工雨滴算法的义务教育资源配置优化模型研究[D]. 西安:西安理工大学, 2018:29-30. [QU Lihuan. Research on compulsory education resources allocation based on artificial raindrop algorithm [D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Technology, 2018: 29-30]
[31] YU A D. Entropy-based estimation in classification problems [J]. Automation and Remote Control, 2019, 80(3): 502-512. DOI: 10.1134/S0005117919030093
[32] 夏孝东. 铅锌尾矿库生态修复评价指标体系的构建及验证研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2017: 37-39. [ XIA Xiaodong. Construction of evaluation index system for ecological restoration of lead zinc tailings verification study [D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2017: 37-39]
[33] HAN Baolong, LIU Hongxiao, WANG Rusong. Urban ecological security assessment for cities in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan region based on fuzzy and entropy methods [J]. Ecological Modelling, 2015, 318(1): 217-225. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.12.015
[34] HAN Baolong, WANG Rusong, TAO Yu, et al. Urban population agglomeration in view of complex ecological niche: A case study on Chinese prefecture cities [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 47(1): 128-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.002
[35] 胡秀芳, 赵军, 查书平, 等. 草原生态安全模糊评价方法研究——以甘肃天祝高寒草原为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2011, 25(3):71-77. [HU Xiufang, ZHAO Jun, ZHA Shuping, et al. A study of fuzzy evaluation of grassland ecological security: A case of alpine grassland in Tianzhu [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2011, 25(3):71-77] DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2011.03.012
[36] 宋坤坤. 高含硫气田区域代表性植物的生态影响分析[D]. 青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2017:1-78. [SONG Kunkun. An analysis of the ecological impact of the representative plants of the high-sulfur gas field [D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum(East China), 2017:1-78]
[37] 中华人民共和国水利部. 土壤侵蚀分类分级标准: SL190-2007 [S], 2008. [Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China. Standard for classification and gradation of soil erosion: SL190-2007 [S], 2008.]
[38] 国家环境保护局. 生态环境状况评价技术规范(试行): HJ/T192-2006 [S], 2006. [State Environmental Protection Bureau. Technical criterion ecosystem status evaluation: HJ/T192-2006 [S], 2006]
[39] 刘科举, 喜文化, 高天鹏, 等. 甘肃国家生态安全屏障建设发展报告[M]. 北京: 社会科学文教出版社, 2017. [LIU Keju, XI Wenhua, GAO Tianpeng, et al. Report on the development of Gansu province's national ecological security barriers [M]. Beijing: Publisher Social Science Literature, 2017]
[40] 屈芳青, 周万村. RS和GIS支持下的若儿盖草原生态安全模糊评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2007,25(4):24-29. [QU Fangqing, ZHOU Wancun. A fuzzy evaluation of Ruoergai grassland ecological security based on RS and GIS [J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2007,25(4):24-29] DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7601.2007.04.005
[41] 廖雨辰, 谢雨, 刘俊雁, 等. 九寨沟自然保护区生态安全动态评价及障碍因子分析[J]. 生态学报, 2021,41(15):5950-5960. [LIAO Yuchen, XIE Yu, LIU Junyan, et al. Ecological security dynamic assessment and obstacle factors analysis in Jiuzhaigou National Nature Reserve [J]. Acta Ecology Ssinica, 2021,41(15):5950-5960] DOI: 10.5846/stxb202002130243
[42] 国家林业和草原局. 国家公园监测规范: GB/T 39738-2020 [S], 2020. [National Forestry and Grassland Administration. Specification for monitoring of the national park: GB/T 39738-2020 [S], 2020]
[43] 蒲莹, 牟耀杰, 邵景安. 三峡库区近20年森林生态服务功能变化及影响因素分析——以石柱县为例[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020(6):31-39. [PU Ying, MU Yaojie, SHAO Jing'an. Analysis of forest ecological service function change and its influencing factors of the Three Gorges Reservoir area in the past 20 years: A case study of Shizhu county [J]. Forest Resources Management, 2020(6):31-39] DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2020.06.006
[44] 陈彩虹, 肖默. 长株潭城市群城市森林生态系统服务功能的价值评估[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2011, 31(2):50-54. [CHEN Caihong, XIAO Mo. Evaluation of forest ecosystem service function value of urban forest in Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan city group [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2011, 31(2):50-54] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2011.02.008
[45] 汤萃文, 陶玲, 杨国靖, 等. 祁连山典型林区生态服务功能间接价值估算[J].生态学杂志, 2011, 30(3):569-575. [TANG Cuiwen, TAO Ling, YANG Guojing, et al. Estimation of indirect values of forest ecosystem services in a typical forest area of Qilian Mountains [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2011, 30(3): 569-575] DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2011.0091
[46] 蒋友严, 杜文涛, 黄进, 等. 2000—2015年祁连山植被变化分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2017, 39(5):1130-1136. [JIANG Youyan, DU Wentao, HUANG Jin, et al. Analysis of vegetation changes in the Qilian Mountains during 2000-2015 [J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2017, 39(5): 1130-1136] DOI: 10.7522 /j.issn.1000-0240.2017.0401
[47] 张强, 杜志成. 丝绸之路经济带上区域生态安全评价研究——以祁连山冰川与水涵养生态功能区为例[J]. 生态经济, 2016,32(10):169-173. [ZHANG Qiang, DU Zhicheng, et al. Evaluation research on regional ecological security of Silk Road Economic Belt: A case study of Qilian Mountains and water conservation ecological functional district province [J]. Ecological Economy, 2016, 32(10): 169-173] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4407.2016.10.036
[48] 应凌霄, 孔令桥, 肖燚, 等. 生态安全及其评价方法研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2022,42(5):1679-1692. [YING Lingxiao, KONG Lingqiao, XIAO Yan, et al.The research progress and prospect of ecological security and its assessing approaches [J]. Acta Ecological Sinica, 2022,42(5):1679-1692] DOI: 10.5846/stxb202104171002
[49] 王丽娜, 李爽, 吴迪, 等. 景感生态学:生态安全研究与实践的重要途径[J]. 生态学报, 2020,40(22):8028-8033. [WANG Lina,LI Shuang,WU Di, et al.Landsenses ecology: An important approach to research and practice of ecological security [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(22): 8028-8033] DOI: 10.5846 /stxb202003110495
[50] 曹秉帅, 邹长新, 高吉喜, 等. 生态安全评价方法及其应用[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(8): 953-963. [CAO Bingshuai, ZOU Changxin, GAO Jixi, et al.Review on methodology and application of ecological security assessment [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2019, 35(8): 953-963] DOI: 10.19741 /j.issn.1673-4831.2018.0449
[51] RAO Kai, YANG Zisheng. Evaluation of mountain land ecological security based on DPSIR model and entropy weight method [J]. Asian Agricultural Research, 2020, 12(2): 28-33+37. DOI: 10.19601/j.cnki.issn1943-9903.2020.02.007
[52] WANG Qingfeng, YANG Qianqian, GUO Hong, et al. Hydrothermal variations in soils resulting from the freezing and thawing processes in the active layer of an alpine grassland in the Qilian Mountains, northeastern Tibetan Plateau [J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2019,136(3-4):929-941. DOI: 10.1007/s00704-018-2529-y

相似文献/References:

[1]王 毅,谢蓉蓉,王菲凤*,等.基于Delphi-PSR模型的祁连山国家级自然保护区生态安全评价[J].山地学报,2019,(03):328.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000426]
　WANG Yi,XIE Rongrong,WANG Feifeng*,et al.Evaluation on Eco-security of Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve Based on Delphi-PSR Model[J].Mountain Research,2019,(4):328.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000426]
[2]熊俊楠a*,曹依帆a,孙 铭,等.基于GIS和熵权法的滑坡作用下的长输油气管道易损性评价[J].山地学报,2020,(5):717.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000549]
　XIONG Junana*,CAO Yifana,SUN Ming,et al.Vulnerability Evaluation of Long-Distance Oil and Gas Pipelines under Landslide Actions Based on GIS and Entropy Weight Method[J].Mountain Research,2020,(4):717.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000549]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2021-10-23; 改回日期(Accepted date):2022-05-20
基金项目(Foundation item):盛彤笙科技创新基金项目(GSAU-STS-1436)。 [Shengtongsheng Foundation Project(GSAU-STS-1436)]
作者简介(Biography):马娟娟(1996-),女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:景观生态。[MA Juanjuan(1996-), female, M.Sc.candidate, research on landscape ecology] E-mail:2522375883@qq.com
*通讯作者(Corresponding author):李晓兵(1974-),正高级工程师,主要研究方向:自然资源资产调查及管理。[LI Xiaobing(1974-), male, senior engineer, research on survey and management of natural resources assets] E-mail: lixbinfo@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-08-30