[1]高全,陈晓清,贾世涛,等.交错齿槛槽排导粘性泥石流的试验[J].山地学报,2011,(01):101.
 GAO Quan,CHEN Xiaoqing,et al.Experiment of Drainage Canal with Indentedsill for Viscous Debris Flow[J].Mountain Research,2011,(01):101.
点击复制

交错齿槛槽排导粘性泥石流的试验()
分享到:

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2011年01期
页码:
101
栏目:
山地学报
出版日期:
2011-01-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Experiment of Drainage Canal with Indentedsill for Viscous Debris Flow
作者:
高全;陈晓清;贾世涛;黄凯;
1.中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所/中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室, 四川 成都 610041;
2. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049;
3 西南交通大学土木工程学院, 四川 成都 610031
Author(s):
GAO Quan CHEN Xiaoqing JIA Shitao HUANG Kai
1. CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Surface Processes, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Science & Ministry of Water Conservancy, Chengdu 610041, China;
2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. School of Civil Engineering,Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
关键词:
泥石流排导槽交错齿槛排导特征
Keywords:
debris flow drainage channel indentedsill drainage characteristic
分类号:
P64223
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
排导槽是一种结构简单、效果明显、用途广泛的泥石流防治措施,在总结东川槽、"V"型槽等现有排导槽槽型优缺点的基础上,结合一种新槽型——交错齿槛型泥石流排导槽展开试验研究。提出排导槽排导指数概念,即直接反应排导槽排泄能力的参数。利用室内水槽模型试验,通过改变交错槽纵比降、齿槛间距、夹角等参数,得出排导指数与上述参数的关系,试验结果表明:1.与东川槽相比,交错齿槛槽的排导能力有大幅度的提升,最大增幅达74%,表明交错齿槛有较强的挑流排泄能力,能有效解决东川槽等存在的淤积难题;2.不同比降下,交错槽主要设计参数组合存在差异,其中10%与15%比降下,60°齿槛间距为30 cm时,交错槽的排导指数最大,...
Abstract:
Drainage channel is one the most commonly useful debris flow countermeasures with such superiorities as simple structure and convenient construction. According to the construction experience of Dongchuantype and “V-type”, an indoor flume model experiment on drainage channel with indentedsill has been performed. The definition of drainage index was proposed, i.e. a parameter of showing drainage ability of channel. In the experiment, longitudinal slope, distance between two sill and angle of sills were changed to analyze the variation law of drainage index. (1) Compared with Dongchuantype, the drainage ability of drainage canal with indentedsill increased largely with the top increment rate of 73%, that is, indented sill has obvious flow oriented effect, which is helpful to solve the problem of debrisflow siltation; (2) When the longitudinal slope is 10% or 15%, indented sill with an angle of 60 and a distance of 30cm can largely increase drainage ability of channel, whereas when longitudinal slope is 12%, the best combination is 60°and 40 cm, (3) Sills with small angle (60°) can be more fit for debrisflow with low longitudinal slope, however, sills with large angle (80°) can be more suited to debrisflow with steep gradient.

相似文献/References:

[1]蒋志林,朱静,常鸣,等.汶川地震区红椿沟泥石流形成物源量动态演化特征[J].山地学报,2014,(01):81.
 JIANG Zhilin,ZHU Jing,CHANG Ming,et al.Dynamic Evolution Characteristics of Hongchun Gully Source Area of Debris Flow in Wenchuan Earthquake Region[J].Mountain Research,2014,(01):81.
[2]常鸣,唐川,蒋志林,等.强震区都江堰市龙池镇泥石流物源的遥感动态演变[J].山地学报,2014,(01):89.
 CHANG Ming,TANG Chuan,JIANG Zhilin,et al.Dynamic Evolution Process of Sediment Supply for Debris Flow Occurrence in Longchi of Dujiangyan,Wenchuan Earthquake Area[J].Mountain Research,2014,(01):89.
[3]王 钧,欧国强,杨 顺,等.地貌信息熵在地震后泥石流危险性评价中的应用[J].山地学报,2013,(01):83.
 WANG Jun,OU Guoqiang,YANG Shun,et al.Applicability of Geomorphic Information Entropy in the Postearthquake Debris Flow Risk Assessment[J].Mountain Research,2013,(01):83.
[4]王东坡,何思明,葛胜锦,等.“9?07”彝良地震诱发次生山地灾害调查及减灾建议[J].山地学报,2013,(01):101.
 WANG Dongpo,HE Siming,GE Shengjin,et al.Mountain Hazards Induced by the Earthquake of Sep 07,2012 in Yiliang and the Suggestions of Disaster Reduction[J].Mountain Research,2013,(01):101.
[5]喻 武,万 丹,汪书丽,等.藏东南泥石流沉积区植物群落结构和物种多样性特征[J].山地学报,2013,(01):120.
 YU Wu,WAN Dan,WANG Shuli,et al.Community Structure and Species Diversity of Debris Flow Deposition Area in Southeast of Tibet,China[J].Mountain Research,2013,(01):120.
[6]崔鹏,陈晓清,张建强,等.“4·20”芦山7.0级地震次生山地灾害活动特征与趋势[J].山地学报,2013,(03):257.
 CUI Peng,CHEN Xiaoqing,ZHANG Jianqiang,et al.Activities and Tendency of Mountain Hazards Induced by the Ms7.0 Lushan Earthquake,April 20,2013[J].Mountain Research,2013,(01):257.
[7]邹强,崔鹏,杨伟,等.G318川藏公路段泥石流危险性评价[J].山地学报,2013,(03):342.
 ZOU Qiang,CUI Peng,YANG Wei.Hazard Assessment of Debris Flows along G318 Sichuan-Tibet Highway[J].Mountain Research,2013,(01):342.
[8]王根龙,张茂省,于国强,等.舟曲2010年“8·8”特大泥石流灾害致灾因素[J].山地学报,2013,(03):349.
 WANG Genlong,ZHANG Maosheng,YU Guoqiang,et al.Factor Analysis for Catastrophic Debris Flows on August 8,2010 in Zhouqu City of Gansu,China[J].Mountain Research,2013,(01):349.
[9]陈源井,余斌,朱渊,等.地震后泥石流临界雨量变化特征——以汶川地震区小岗剑沟为例[J].山地学报,2013,(03):356.
 CHEN Yuanjing,YU Bin,ZHU Yuan,et al.Characteristics of Critical Rainfall of Debris Flow after Earthquake——A Case Study of the Xiaogangjian Gully[J].Mountain Research,2013,(01):356.
[10]游勇,柳金峰,陈兴长,等.芦山“4·20”地震后宝兴县城打水沟泥石流发育趋势及防治方案[J].山地学报,2013,(04):495.
 YOU Yong,LIU Jinfeng,CHEN Xingzhang.The Potential Tendency and Mitigation Measures of Dashui Gully in Baoxing Coutny after Lushan“4?20”Earthquake of Schuan[J].Mountain Research,2013,(01):495.
[11]周富春,陈洪凯,马永泰.排导结构中泥石流的流动形态[J].山地学报,2001,(02):165.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2010-08-10;改回日期(Accepted) : 2010-10-31。
基金项目(Foundation item):国家自然科学基金(41072270)与国家重点基础研究发展计划“973”计划(2008CB425802)。\[This research is supported by China National Science Fund (41072270) and National Basic Research Program "973"Program (2008CB425802).\]
作者简介(Biography):高全,(1985-),男,湖北宜都人, 硕士研究生, 主要从事泥石流防治。\[Gao Quan, male, born in 1985, Yidu of Hubei province, Master, Mainly engaged in debris flow prevention and mitigation.\] E-mail:cheney.gao@gmail.com *
通讯作者(Corresponding author):陈晓清(1974- ),男,四川遂宁人,博士,研究员.主要从事山地灾害防治理论研究。 \[Chen Xiaoqing, male, born in 1974, Suining of Sichuan province, Doctor, professor, mainly engaged in mountain hazards prevention and mitigation. \]E-mail: xqchen@imde.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01