[1]苗培培,赵筱青*,普军伟,等.喀斯特山区生态系统服务权衡/协同时空分异研究——以云南广南县为例[J].山地学报,2023,(1):103-114.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000734]
　MIAO Peipei,ZHAO Xiaoqing*,PU Junwei,et al.Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Ecosystem Service Synergy/Trade-Offs in the Mountainous Karst Areas: A Case Study of Guangnan County, Yunnan, China[J].Mountain Research,2023,(1):103-114.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000734]
点击复制

喀斯特山区生态系统服务权衡/协同时空分异研究——以云南广南县为例
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2023年第1期
页码:
103-114
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2023-01-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Ecosystem Service Synergy/Trade-Offs in the Mountainous Karst Areas: A Case Study of Guangnan County, Yunnan, China
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2023)1-103-12
作者:
苗培培; 赵筱青*; 普军伟; 李思楠; 王 茜; 谭 琨
(云南大学 地球科学学院,昆明 650000)
Author(s):
MIAO Peipei;  ZHAO Xiaoqing*;  PU Junwei;  LI Sinan;  WANG Qian;  TAN Kun
(School of Earth Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650000, China)
关键词:
生态系统服务;  权衡/协同;  时空分异;  空间异质性;  中国喀斯特山区
Keywords:
ecosystem services;  trade-offs/synergies;  spatial and temporal differentiation;  spatial heterogeneity;  the mountainous karst areas;  China
分类号:
K901
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000734
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
人类活动影响喀斯特山区生态系统服务功能。喀斯特山区生态系统服务权衡/协同作用及时空差异特征分析,是指导山区生态恢复及保护的重要依据。当前针对中国喀斯特山区的相关研究多以生态系统服务权衡/协同关系的时间变化为主,较少对权衡/协同关系变化的空间异质性及空间可视化进行研究,难以全面揭示各类服务间的复杂关系。本研究以云南喀斯特山区广南县为例,采用模型评估及相关分析等方法对六种生态系统服务进行评估,分析其时空变化、空间异质性和权衡/协同变化关系。结果表明:(1)2000—2018年,年均食物供给量和文化价值量呈逐年增加趋势,年均产水量、土壤保持量和固碳价值量呈先减少后增加趋势,年均生境质量呈逐年下降趋势。(2)空间上,食物供给量、文化价值量和产水量呈中部和中南部增加较多的特征,而土壤保持量与其呈大致相反的趋势,固碳价值量和生境质量空间上呈东部增加较多的趋势。(3)自相关关系上,各生态系统服务全局Moran's I指数大小为:固碳>食物供给>土壤保持>产水>文化>生境支持服务,生境支持服务在空间上呈离散化状态,而其他服务均呈集聚分布特征,且空间分异以不显著区和低-低区集群分布为主。(4)权衡/协同关系的时间变化格局上,生境支持服务-固碳释氧相关性为高度正相关,协同性系数最高,而产水-土壤保持相关性为中度负相关,权衡性系数最低; 空间变化格局上,食物供给-产水、文化-固碳间空间分布均为协同关系,产水-土壤保持、固碳-产水均为权衡关系。空间格局整体以协同关系为主,权衡区与协同区空间分布有所差异。生态系统服务相关性及权衡/协同分析,有助于对研究区自然资源进行宏观调控,缓解经济发展与生态保护的矛盾。研究结果丰富了喀斯特山区生态系统恢复这一领域研究内容,有利于促进广南县资源环境的协调发展。
Abstract:
The disturbance of human activities in fragile ecosystems in karst mountainous areas affects and changes the local ecological service functions. The trade-offs/synergies of ecosystem services and their spatiotemporal differentiation can be used to guide ecological restoration and conservation in the mountainous karst areas.Most research on the mountainous karst areas focused on the temporal changes of the trade-off/synergistic relationships of ecosystem services, but less on the spatial heterogeneity and spatial visualization, making it difficult to fully reveal the complex relationships among various services.In this study, model assessment and correlation analysis were used to assess six ecosystem services in Guangnan county, a mountainous karst region in Yunnan of China, and then to analyze their spatiotemporal changes, spatial heterogeneity and trade-off/synergistic relationships.Results:(1)From 2000 to 2018, there had been a yearly increase in the average annual food supply and cultural value; the average annual water yield, soil conservation and carbon sequestration value decreased first and then increased; the average annual habitat quality decreased year by year.(2)Spatially, the food supply, cultural value and water yield increased more in the central and south-central parts of the county, whereas soil conservation had an opposite trend, and carbon sequestration value and habitat quality increased more in the east.(3)As to autocorrelation, the global Moran's I index of each ecosystem service was carbon sequestration > food supply > soil conservation > water yield > culture > habitat support services. The habitat support services were spatially discrete, whereas all other services were clustered, whose spatial differentiation were dominated by “insignificant” zones and “low-low” aggregation distribution.(4)In the temporal pattern of trade-off/synergistic relationships, the correlation between habitat support services and carbon sequestration and oxygen release was highly positive with the highest synergistic coefficient, while the correlation between water production and soil conservation was moderately negative with the lowest trade-off coefficient; as to the spatial pattern, the spatial distribution of food supply-water production and culture-carbon sequestration were all synergistic relationships, while water yield-soil conservation and carbon sequestration-water yield were all trade-off relationships. The overall spatial pattern was governed by synergistic relationships, with differences in the spatial distribution of trade-off and synergistic areas.Our research achievement of ecosystem service correlation and trade-off/synergy can help to macro-regulate natural resources in the study area and eliminate the dilemma of economic development and ecological conservation. This research provides new insights into the discipline of karst mountain ecosystem restoration, and particularly help to directly manage the coordinated development of resources and environment in Guangnan county.

参考文献/References:

[1] COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260.
[2] FU Bojie, WANG Shuai, SU Changhong, et al. Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services [J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5(1): 4-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.12.002
[3]齐菲, 李彦鑫, 高会, 等.“三生”用地结构变化对生态系统服务和农户生计的影响——以太行山区洞阳坡小流域为例[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2022, 30(7): 1101-1112. [QI Fei, LI Yanxin, GAO Hui, et al. The impact of “Production-Living-Ecological” land structure change on ecosystem services and farmers' livelihood: A case study of the Dongyangpo watershed in Taihang Mountain area [J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2022, 30(7): 1101-1112] DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20220055.
[4] ZHANG Biao, SHI Yunting, WANG Shuang. A review on the driving mechanisms of ecosystem services [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2022, 13(1): 68-79. DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2022.01.008
[5] LANG Yanqing, SONG Wei. Trade-off analysis of ecosystem services in a mountainous karst area, China [J]. Water, 2018, 10: 300. DOI: 10.3390/w10030300
[6] FANG Lin, LIU Yanxiao, LI Canfeng, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics and future scenario simulation of the trade-offs and synergies of mountain ecosystem services: A case study of the Dabie Mountains area, China [J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2023, 33(1): 144-160. DOI: 10.1007/s11769-023-1330-8
[7]胡秀芳, 赵军, 王蓓, 等. 黑河流域生态系统服务空间协同与权衡变化[J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(3): 580-588. [HU Xiufang, ZHAO Jun, WANG Bei, et al. Changes of spatial synergies or trade-offs of ecosystem services in Heihe River Basin [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2022, 41(3): 580-588] DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202201.001
[8] 韩会庆, 苏志华. 喀斯特生态系统服务研究进展与展望[J]. 中国岩溶, 2017, 36(3): 352-358. [HAN Huiqing, SU Zhihua. Research progress and prospects of karst ecosystem services [J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2017, 36(3): 352-358] DOI: 10.11932/karst20170309
[9] 韩会庆. 贵州省生态系统服务变化及驱动机理研究[D]. 广州:中山大学, 2016. [HAN Huiqing. Variation of ecosystem services and its driving mechanism in Guizhou province [D]. Chuangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University, 2016]
[10] 王晓萌, 潘佩佩, 王晓旭, 等. 基于土地利用的河北省生态系统服务权衡/协同关系研究[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2021, 37(1): 80-88. [WANG Xiaomeng, PAN Peipei, WANG Xiaoxu, et al. Research on ecosystem service trade-off/synergy relationship in Hebei province based on land use [J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2021, 37(1): 80-88] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0504.2021.01.013
[11] 傅伯杰, 于丹丹. 生态系统服务权衡与集成方法[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(1): 1-9. [FU Bojie, YU Dandan. Trade-off analyses and synthetic integrated method of multiple ecosystem services [J]. Resource Science, 2016, 38(1): 1-9] DOI: 10.18402/resci.2016.01.01
[12] NIU Teng, YU Jiaxin, YUE Depeng, et al. The temporal and spatial evolution of ecosystem service synergy/trade-offs based on ecological units [J]. Forests, 2021, 12: 992. DOI: 10.3390/f12080992
[13] 张苗, 杨国庆, 王军邦, 等. 秦巴山区生态系统服务权衡-协同关系[J]. 山地学报, 2022, 40(1): 1-13. [ZHANG Miao, YANG Guoqing, WANG Junbang, et al. Trade-off synergy of ecosystem services in the Qinba mountainous area of China [J]. Mountain Research, 2022, 40(1): 1-13] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000651
[14] 侯文娟, 高江波, 彭韬, 等. 结构-功能-生境框架下的西南喀斯特生态系统脆弱性研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(3): 320-330. [HOU Wenjuan, GAO Jiangbo, PENG Tao, et al. Review of ecosystem vulnerability studies in the karst region of southwest China based on a structure-function-habitat framework [J]. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(3): 320-330] DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.03.006
[15] LANG Yanqing, SONG Wei. Trade-off analysis of ecosystem services in a mountainous karst area, China[J]. Water, 2018,10(3):300.
[16] 熊康宁, 池永宽. 中国南方喀斯特生态系统面临的问题及对策[J]. 生态经济, 2015, 31(1): 23-30. [XIONG Kangning, CHI Yongkuan. The problems in southern China karst ecosystem and its countermeasures [J]. Ecological Economy, 2015, 31(1): 23-30]
[17] 李驭豪. 喀斯特地区土地利用变化下生态系统服务权衡/协同关系研究[D]. 昆明: 云南大学, 2020. [LI Yuhao. Study on trade-off/synergy of ecosystem services respond to land use change in karst region [D]. Kunming: Yunnan University, 2020] DOI: 10.27456/d.cnki.gyndu.2020.001385
[18] 李益敏, 李驭豪, 赵筱青, 等. 云南省文山市生态系统服务的权衡/协同关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2022, 31(11): 2545-2555. [LI Yimin, LI Yuhao, ZHAO Xiaoqing, et al. Spatial and temporal patterns and interrelationships of ecosystem services in Wenshan city, Yunnan province [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2022, 31(11): 2545-2555] DOI: 10.11870 /cjlyzyyhj202211019
[19] 秦瑶, 熊康宁, 陈起伟, 等. 喀斯特地区生态系统服务变化及权衡协同关系[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2021, 44(9): 228-236. [QIN Yao, XIONG Kangning, CHEN Qiwei, et al. Ecosystem service changes and trade-off synergistic relationships in karst areas [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2021, 44(9): 228-236] DOI: 10.19672/j.cnki.1003-6504.0938.21.338
[20] 赵筱青, 石小倩, 李驭豪, 等. 滇东南喀斯特山区生态系统服务时空格局及功能分区[J].地理学报, 2022, 77(3): 736-756. [ZHAO Xiaoqing, SHI Xiaoqian, LI Yuhao, et al. Spatial-temporal pattern and functional zoning of ecosystem services in the karst mountainous areas of southeastern Yunnan [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(3): 736-756] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202203016
[21] 广南县统计局. 广南县统计公报[N]. 广南县统计年鉴, 2017. [Guannan county Bureau of Statistics. Statistical bulletin of Guangnan county [N]. Guangnan County Statistical Yearbook, 2017]
[22] 苗培培. 云南省喀斯特山区生态系统服务演变及人文驱动力研究[D]. 昆明: 云南大学, 2020. [MIAO Peipei. A study on ecosystem service evolution and human driving force in karst mountainous areas of Yunnan province [D]. Kunming: Yunnan University, 2020] DOI: 10.27456/d.cnki.gyndu.2020.001474
[23] 苗培培, 赵祖军, 赵筱青, 等. 云南典型石漠化区生态系统服务权衡与协同研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(4): 366-374. [MIAO Peipei, ZHAO Zujun, ZHAO Xiaoqing, et al. Study on trade-off and cooperation of ecosystem service space in rocky desertification area of Yunnan province [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(4): 366-374] DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc. 2021.04.039
[24] 陈田田, 黄强, 王强. 基于地理探测器的喀斯特山区生态系统服务关系分异特征及驱动力解析——以贵州省为例[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(17): 6959-6972. [CHEN Tiantian, HUANG Qiang, WANG Qiang. Differentiation characteristics and driving factors of ecosystem services relationships in karst mountainous area based on geographic detector modeling: A case study of Guizhou province [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(17): 6959-6972] DOI: 10.5846/stxb202109012470
[25] MIAO Peipei, ZHAO Xiaoqing, PU Junwei, et al. Study on the evolution mechanism of ecosystem services in karst mountainous areas from the perspective of humanities [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19: 13628. DOI: 10.3390/ ijerph192013628
[26] GROTEN S M E. NDVI-crop monitoring and early yield assessment of Burkina Faso [J]. Remote Sensing, 1993, 14(8): 1495-1515.
[27] 巩杰, 柳冬青, 高秉丽, 等. 西部山区流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系——以甘肃白龙江流域为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(4): 1278-1288. [GONG Jie, LIU Dongqing, GAO Bingli, et al. Tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services in western mountainous China: A case study of the Bailongjiang watershed in Gansu China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(4): 1278-1288] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202004.019
[28] 朱文泉, 潘耀忠, 张锦水. 中国陆地植被净初级生产力遥感估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(3): 413-424. [ZHU Wenquan, PAN Yaozhong, ZHANG Jinshui. Estimation of net primary productivity of Chinese terrestrial vegetation based on remote sensing [J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(3): 413-424]
[29] 林世伟. “三江并流”区生态系统服务空间权衡与协同关系研究[D]. 昆明: 云南大学, 2016. [LIN Shiwei. Spatial trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in the Three Parallel Rivers region [D]. Kunming: Yunnan University, 2016]
[30] 王蓓. 基于InVEST模型的石羊河流域生态系统服务功能时空变化研究[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2017. [WANG Bei. Spatio-temporal changes of ecosystem services in Shiyang River Basin based on invest model [D]. Lanzhou: Northwest Normal University, 2017]
[31] 郎焱卿. 喀斯特山区生态服务功能的权衡研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2017. [LANG Yanqing. Tradeoff analysis of ecosystem services in the karst mountainous area [D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2017]
[32] 韩会庆, 杨建强, 陈思盈, 等. 喀斯特山区淡水生态系统服务权衡-协同关系的空间粒度效应[J]. 济南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 36(1): 45-55. [HAN Huiqing, YANG Jianqiang, CHEN Siying, et al. Spatial grain size effect of trade-off-synergy relationship between freshwater ecosystem services in karst mountains areas [J]. Journal of University of Jinan(Science and Technology), 2022, 36(1): 45-55] DOI: 10.13349/j.cnki.jdxbn.20210924.002
[33] 汪仕美, 靳甜甜, 燕玲玲, 等. 子午岭区生态系统服务权衡与协同变化及其影响因素[J].应用生态学报, 2022, 33(11): 3087-3096. [WANG Shimei, JIN Tiantian, YAN Lingling, et al. Trade-off and synergy among ecosystem services and the influencing factors in the Ziwu ling region, northwest China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(11): 3087-3096] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202211.027

相似文献/References:

[1]赖 敏,吴绍洪,戴尔阜,等.生态建设背景下三江源自然保护区生态系统服务价值变化[J].山地学报,2013,(01):8.
　LAI Min,WU Shaohong,DAI Erfu,et al.Dynamic Valuation on Ecosystem Services to Ecological Construction in the Three-River Headwaters Nature Reserve，China[J].Mountain Research,2013,(1):8.
[2]谢高地,鲁春霞,肖玉,等.青藏高原高寒草地生态系统服务价值评估[J].山地学报,2003,(01):50.
[3]刘军会,高吉喜.北方农牧交错带生态系统服务价值测算及变化[J].山地学报,2008,(02):145.
[4]张继飞,邓 伟*,朱昌丽,等.岷江上游生态系统服务与居民福祉的空间关联及其动态特征[J].山地学报,2017,(03):388.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000235]
　ZHANG Jifei,DENG Wei,ZHU Changli,et al.Spatial Relationship and Its Dynamic Features of Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing in the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River[J].Mountain Research,2017,(1):388.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000235]
[5]徐凌星,杨德伟*,刘丹丹,等.青藏高原生态系统服务的时空分布特征与供需关系[J].山地学报,2020,(4):483.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000527]
　XU Lingxing,YANG Dewei,et al.Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics and Supply-Demand Relationships of Ecosystem Services on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China[J].Mountain Research,2020,(1):483.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000527]
[6]张 苗,杨国庆,王军邦*,等.秦巴山区生态系统服务权衡—协同关系[J].山地学报,2022,(1):1.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000651]
　ZHANG Miao,YANG guoqing,WANG Junbang*,et al.Trade-Off Synergy of Ecosystem Services in the Qinba Mountainous Area of China[J].Mountain Research,2022,(1):1.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000651]
[7]陈田田ab*,黄 强b,王 强.基于生态系统服务供需关系的成渝城市群生态安全分区识别[J].山地学报,2022,(5):727.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000707]
　CHEN Tiantianab*,HUANG Qiangb,WANG Qiang.Ecological Security Zoning Identification of the Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration Based on Supply-Demand Relation of Ecosystem Services[J].Mountain Research,2022,(1):727.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000707]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2021-11-12; 改回日期(Accepted date): 2023-02-01
基金项目(Foundation item): 云南省科技厅—云南大学联合基金重点项目(2018FY001-017); 国家自然科学基金(42061052、41361020); 云南大学研究生创新人才培养项目(C176230200); 云南省教育厅科学研究基金(2018Y001)。[Yunnan Provincial Department of Science and Technology-Yunnan University Joint Fund Key Project(2018FY001-017); National Natural Science Foundation of China(42061052, 41361020); Yunnan University Graduate Innovative Talents Training Project(C176230200); Yunnan Provincial Department of Education Scientific Research Fund Project(2018Y001)]
作者简介(Biography): 苗培培(1991-),男,河南永城人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:土地利用/覆被变化的生态环境效应与景观生态安全格局。[MIAO Peipei(1991-), male, born in Yongcheng, Henan province, M. Sc. candidate, research on ecological environment effect of land use/cover change and landscape ecological security pattern] E-mail:1029907902@qq.com
*通讯作者(Corresponding author): 赵筱青(1969-),女,博士,教授,主要研究方向:土地利用变化及生态环境效应。[ZHAO Xiaoqing(1969-), female, Ph.D., professor, research on ecological environment effect and landscape ecological security pattern of land use/cover change] E-mail: xqzhao@ynu.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-01-30