[1]朱渊,余斌,陈源井,等.贵州望谟打蒿沟“6·06”泥石流特征[J].山地学报,2012,(05):599.
　ZHU Yuan,YU Bin,CHEN Yuanjing,et al.The “6?06 ”Disaster Characteristics and Forming Mechanism of Debris Flow in Wangmo，Guizhou[J].Mountain Research,2012,(05):599.
点击复制

贵州望谟打蒿沟“6·06”泥石流特征()
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2012年05期
页码:
599
栏目:
山地学报
出版日期:
2012-01-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
The “6?06 ”Disaster Characteristics and Forming Mechanism of Debris Flow in Wangmo，Guizhou
作者:
朱渊;余斌;陈源井;王涛;亓星;
成都理工大学地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室，四川 成都610059
Author(s):
ZHU Yuan; YU Bin; CHEN Yuanjing; WANG Tao; QI Xing
State Key Lab. of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection，Chengdu University of Technology，Chengdu 610059，China
关键词:
打蒿沟; 泥石流; 形成机理; 启动类型; 岸坡坡度
Keywords:
Dahao gully; debris flow; formation mechanism; startup type; bank slope
分类号:
P642.23
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
2011-06-06贵州省望谟县北部普降百年一遇暴雨,引发大规模群发性泥石流灾害,给当地居民生活及交通造成严重损害。其中以打蒿沟泥石流灾害尤为突出,该流域内支沟发育,沟床比降相对较缓,但陡峻的岸坡和较大的汇水面积为泥石流的发生提供了良好的水动力条件。打蒿沟地处碎屑岩发育地区,松散堆积体较厚,并受岸坡坡度影响浅层滑坡发育,现场调查共19处。另外流域内人为破坏严重,村民沿沟垒筑大量梯田也为泥石流活动提供了特殊的人工物源。通过对其4条支沟的研究发现,泥石流形成特征并不一致,其中坡度较缓的2#支沟浅层滑坡发育,为浅层滑坡型泥石流;而坡度较陡的其他3条支沟浅层滑坡发育较少,以沟床物源为主,为沟床启动型泥...
Abstract:
On June 6，2011，most of the northern areas of Wangmo county in Guizhou province had the biggest rainfall in a century and led to breaking out a large scale group debris flows. The disaster caused serious harm to local residents and traffic. The flow disaster characteristics of Dahao gully are particularly outstanding. Some tributaries were developed in Dahao gully. Its gully bed slope is relatively moderate，but steep slope and larger catchment area for the formation of the debris flow select hydrodynamic conditions. The Dahao gully is located in classic rock development area and has thicker loose deposits. Because the bank slope of Dahao gully is more steep，there are 19 shallow landslides in it according to field investigation. In addition，The landscape is be strongly destroyed by villagers. Terraces were fortified along the ditch for special source of material to the out breaking of debris flow. We can found that the formation mechanism is not consistent by the study of its four tributaries. 2# tributary has more gentle slope and more shallow landslides，so its forming type is the shallow landslidedebris flow. But the rest of three tributaries have more steep slope and they are the gullyshape debris flow .Because less shallow landslides was formed in them，their most of material from the ditch bed. Surveying the slope gradient on both sides of the gully，we can conclude that 25～40° is more easily to form the landslide and more shallow slides were generated when the upper part of the slope is obviously more flat than the bottom of it. According to investigation，the Dahao gully can still outbreaks debris flow in the condition of strong rainfall after this disaste ，but the scale will be reduced and it can still causes greater harm under the action of rare and heavy rain similar to“6·06”.

相似文献/References:

[1]蒋志林,朱静,常鸣,等.汶川地震区红椿沟泥石流形成物源量动态演化特征[J].山地学报,2014,(01):81.
　JIANG Zhilin,ZHU Jing,CHANG Ming,et al.Dynamic Evolution Characteristics of Hongchun Gully Source Area of Debris Flow in Wenchuan Earthquake Region[J].Mountain Research,2014,(05):81.
[2]常鸣,唐川,蒋志林,等.强震区都江堰市龙池镇泥石流物源的遥感动态演变[J].山地学报,2014,(01):89.
　CHANG Ming,TANG Chuan,JIANG Zhilin,et al.Dynamic Evolution Process of Sediment Supply for Debris Flow Occurrence in Longchi of Dujiangyan，Wenchuan Earthquake Area[J].Mountain Research,2014,(05):89.
[3]王 钧,欧国强,杨 顺,等.地貌信息熵在地震后泥石流危险性评价中的应用[J].山地学报,2013,(01):83.
　WANG Jun,OU Guoqiang,YANG Shun,et al.Applicability of Geomorphic Information Entropy in the Postearthquake Debris Flow Risk Assessment[J].Mountain Research,2013,(05):83.
[4]王东坡,何思明,葛胜锦,等.“9?07”彝良地震诱发次生山地灾害调查及减灾建议[J].山地学报,2013,(01):101.
　WANG Dongpo,HE Siming,GE Shengjin,et al.Mountain Hazards Induced by the Earthquake of Sep 07，2012 in Yiliang and the Suggestions of Disaster Reduction[J].Mountain Research,2013,(05):101.
[5]喻 武,万 丹,汪书丽,等.藏东南泥石流沉积区植物群落结构和物种多样性特征[J].山地学报,2013,(01):120.
　YU Wu,WAN Dan,WANG Shuli,et al.Community Structure and Species Diversity of Debris Flow Deposition Area in Southeast of Tibet,China[J].Mountain Research,2013,(05):120.
[6]崔鹏,陈晓清,张建强,等.“4·20”芦山7.0级地震次生山地灾害活动特征与趋势[J].山地学报,2013,(03):257.
　CUI Peng,CHEN Xiaoqing,ZHANG Jianqiang,et al.Activities and Tendency of Mountain Hazards Induced by the Ms7.0 Lushan Earthquake，April 20，2013[J].Mountain Research,2013,(05):257.
[7]邹强,崔鹏,杨伟,等.G318川藏公路段泥石流危险性评价[J].山地学报,2013,(03):342.
　ZOU Qiang,CUI Peng,YANG Wei.Hazard Assessment of Debris Flows along G318 Sichuan-Tibet Highway[J].Mountain Research,2013,(05):342.
[8]王根龙,张茂省,于国强,等.舟曲2010年“8·8”特大泥石流灾害致灾因素[J].山地学报,2013,(03):349.
　WANG Genlong,ZHANG Maosheng,YU Guoqiang,et al.Factor Analysis for Catastrophic Debris Flows on August 8，2010 in Zhouqu City of Gansu，China[J].Mountain Research,2013,(05):349.
[9]陈源井,余斌,朱渊,等.地震后泥石流临界雨量变化特征——以汶川地震区小岗剑沟为例[J].山地学报,2013,(03):356.
　CHEN Yuanjing,YU Bin,ZHU Yuan,et al.Characteristics of Critical Rainfall of Debris Flow after Earthquake——A Case Study of the Xiaogangjian Gully[J].Mountain Research,2013,(05):356.
[10]游勇,柳金峰,陈兴长,等.芦山“4·20”地震后宝兴县城打水沟泥石流发育趋势及防治方案[J].山地学报,2013,(04):495.
　YOU Yong,LIU Jinfeng,CHEN Xingzhang.The Potential Tendency and Mitigation Measures of Dashui Gully in Baoxing Coutny after Lushan“4?20”Earthquake of Schuan[J].Mountain Research,2013,(05):495.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date)：2012-06-01；改回日期(Accepted) : 2012-06-28。
基金项目（Foundation item）：贵州省地质灾害监测预警与决策支持平台研究子项目贵州省泥石流启动机理及预警预报研究（基金号ZG0064）。\[Guizhou Province Geological Disaster Monitoring and Early Warning and Decision Support Platform Research Subprojects:Guizhou Province Debris Flow Start Mechanism and Early Warning and Forecasting(Fund No. ZG0064).\]
作者简介（Biography）：朱渊（1987-），男（汉族），四川资阳人，硕士研究生，主要从事地质灾害防治相关工作。\[Zhu Yuan（1987-），male，Han nationality，born in Ziyang Sichuan，graduated student，Undertaking research on prevention of geological disasters.\] E-mail: 363251963@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01