[1]唐玉萍,潘洪义*,张之凤,等.山地丘陵区乡村类型划分及乡村振兴路径研究——以绵阳市为例[J].山地学报,2022,(5):764-777.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000710]
　TANG Yuping,PAN Hongyi*,ZHANG Zhifeng,et al.Classification of Village Types and the Corresponding Path of Rural Revitalization in Mountainous Areas—A Case Study of Mianyang City, Sichuan Province, China[J].Mountain Research,2022,(5):764-777.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000710]
点击复制

山地丘陵区乡村类型划分及乡村振兴路径研究——以绵阳市为例
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2022年第5期
页码:
764-777
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2022-11-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Classification of Village Types and the Corresponding Path of Rural Revitalization in Mountainous Areas—A Case Study of Mianyang City, Sichuan Province, China
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2022)5-764-14
作者:
唐玉萍1; 潘洪义1*; 张之凤1; 马红菊2
(1.四川师范大学 a.西南土地资源评价与监测教育部重点实验室; b.地理与资源科学学院, 成都 610066; 2. 四川省水产学校,成都 611730)
Author(s):
TANG Yuping1;  PAN Hongyi1*;  ZHANG Zhifeng1;  MA Hongju2
(1. a. Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Monitoring in Southwest, Ministry of Education; b. Geography and Resource Science College, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610066, China; 2. Sichuan Fisheries School, Chengdu 611730, China)
关键词:
乡村振兴;  振兴路径;  乡村类型;  绵阳市;  山地丘陵区
Keywords:
rural revitalization;  revitalization path;  village types;  Mianyang city;  mountainous and hilly areas
分类号:
F327
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000710
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
乡村振兴战略是解决城乡发展不平衡不充分、提升乡村可持续发展能力的根本措施。测量乡村振兴潜力,划分乡村类型并提出相应的发展路径,对促进乡村可持续发展具有重要意义。现有研究多以乡村振兴战略为背景开展振兴路径的探讨,缺乏空间数据的使用以及对乡村振兴潜力的定量分析,且对资源相对贫乏地区关注有限,对乡村振兴战略实践的支撑性和指导性不足。本研究以绵阳市为研究区,在辨析乡村振兴概念和内容的基础上,引入多项空间数据,从生产-生活-人口-生态四个维度构建镇域乡村振兴潜力评价指标体系,揭示其空间格局分布规律,并采用K-means聚类法对乡村类型进行划分,进而提出乡村振兴路径。结果表明:(1)受自然和人文因素的影响,乡村振兴潜力得分呈现出明显的空间差异性,高值区和较高值区分布在绵阳市中部和西南部,中值区主要集中在西北部和东南部,低值区集中在北部和西北部,整体上南部的乡村振兴潜力高于北部。(2)依据乡村振兴潜力及形成的内在动因将研究区内乡村划分为产业发展型、集聚提升型和特色发展型,其数量分别占研究区的39.38%、45.17%和15.45%。产业发展型乡村振兴潜力得分高,人口密集,产业发展基础好; 集聚提升型乡村振兴潜力低于产业发展型,该类型乡村主要以传统农业为主,区域竞争力不足,乡村主体流失; 特色发展型特点是生态因子得分占据优势,其余因子得分低,因而乡村振兴潜力得分低。(3)针对不同类型的乡村发展提出乡村振兴路径:产业发展型乡村以高新技术产业为主导,增强优势产业发展,推进主导产业园区建设,同时优化农业产业结构,形成专业化产业; 集聚提升型乡村以协同增长为策略,加强基础设施建设,发展特色观光休闲农业,构建田园综合体模式; 特色发展型乡村以生态旅游为重点,结合绵阳本土人文自然风情,开发独特的旅游资源,发展生态旅游依托型模式。本研究可以为绵阳市乡村振兴提供数据参考,促进乡村振兴目标的实现。
Abstract:
The campaign of rural revitalization gives a political incentive to a sustainable development of villages in China. To examine the potential of rural revitalization and correspondingly categorize the types of villages in China, both establish a scientific research base for innovation of development path of rural revitalization. Although most of previous studies had explored the revitalization path in the circumstances of Chinese rural revitalization strategy, they hardly involved with the spatial data of a research area and bore no relation to a quantitative analysis of rural revitalization potential, and neither did they paid full attention to areas with relatively poor resources; therefore, the efforts in research to support and guide the practice of rural revitalization strategy were quite insufficient. In this study, Mianyang city, Sichuan, China was designed as a case study for exploration of rural revitalization potential and paths. It reexamined the concept and content of rural revitalization; introduced a set of spatial data into an evaluation index system, which was constructed on a town scale to evaluate the potential from four dimensions, production-life-population-ecology. It revealed the distribution law of the potential and categorized the types of villages by the K-means clustering method. Detailed results are listed here:(1)The rural revitalization potentials were subject to natural and human factors of Mianyang city, demonstrating a pattern of distinct spatial heterogeneity according to the scoring of the potentials, with an overall pattern of higher in the south than those in the north. The high score and higher were attached to the central and the southwest of Mianyang city. The areas with median values were mainly concentrated in the northwest and southeast. The low-value areas comprised the north and northwest.(2)In consideration of the pattern of the rural revitalization potentials and the associated driving force, the villages in the study area were grouped into industrial-type, agglomeration-type and specialization-type, with the number accounting for 39.38%, 45.17% and 15.45% of the study area respectively. The industrial-type villages had the highest scores, with densely populated, a better industry development potential; The agglomeration-type villages got less scores than the industrial-type did, which mostly lived on traditional agriculture, with insufficient local competitiveness, nearly loss of rural subjects; The most distinctive feature of the specialization-type villages was their advantages in ecological factor scores, but poor performances in others, leading to low score of rural revitalization potential.(3)According to village types, we proposed the following paths toward rural revitalization. The development of the industrial-type villages should be dominated by high-tech industries, to strengthen the development of advantageous industries, to promote the construction of leading industrial parks, and to optimize the agricultural industrial structure to form specialized industries; The agglomeration-type villages should take synergistic growth as a top priority, to strengthen infrastructure construction, to develop characteristic tourism and leisure agriculture, and to build a countryside complex model; The specialization-type villages should pay attention to eco-tourism, to create unique tourism resources and eco-tourism-based models in terms of local cultural and natural reserves. This study can provide data reference for rural revitalization in Mianyang city, and promote the realization of the goal of rural revitalization in mountainous areas of China.

参考文献/References:

[1] 刘彦随. 新时代乡村振兴地理学研究[J]. 地理研究,2019, 38(3):461-466. [LIU Yansui. Research on the geography of rural revitalization in the new era [J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 461-466] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020190133
[2] 潘竟虎,冯娅娅. 中国农村深度贫困的空间扫描与贫困分异机制的地理探测[J]. 地理学报,2020,75(4):769-788. [PAN Jinghu, FENG Yaya. Spatial distribution of extreme poverty and mechanism of poverty differentiation in rural China based on spatial scan statistics and geographical detector [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(4): 769-788] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202004008
[3] 佟伟铭,郭加新,苏飞,等. 乡村振兴背景下人口迁移对乡村转型发展影响的研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学,2022, 42(4):662-669. [TONG Weiming, GUO Jiaxin, SU Fei, et al. Progress and prospect of the impact of population migration on rural transformation development under the background of rural revitalization [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2022,42(4): 662-669] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2022.04.011
[4] LIU Yansui, LI Yuheng. Revitalize the world's countryside [J]. Nature, 2017, 7667(548):255-257.
[5] 周扬,郭远智,刘彦随. 中国乡村地域类型及分区发展途径[J]. 地理研究, 2019,38(3):467-481. [ZHOU Yang, GUO Yuanzhi, LIU Yansui. Areal types and their development paths in rural China [J]. Geographical Research, 2019,38(3): 467-481] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020180981
[6] 文琦,郑殿元. 西北贫困地区乡村类型识别与振兴途径研究[J]. 地理研究,2019,38(3):509-521. [WEN Qi, ZHENG Dianyuan. Identification and revitalization of rural poverty-stricken areas in northwest China [J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 509-521] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020181230
[7] 何仁伟. 城乡融合与乡村振兴:理论探讨、机理阐释与实现路径[J]. 地理研究,2018,37(11):2127-2140. [HE Renwei. Urban-rural integration and rural revitalization: Theory, mechanism and implementation [J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(11): 2127-2140] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201811001
[8] 张建伟,图登克珠. 乡村振兴战略的理论、内涵与路径研究[J]. 农业经济, 2020(7): 22-24. [ZHANG Jianwei, Tubden Kyedrup. Research on the theory, connotation and path of rural revitalization strategy [J]. Agricultural Economy, 2020(7): 22-24] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6139.2020.07.009
[9] 周林洁, 傅帅雄. 乡村振兴战略下解决“三农”问题的逻辑、关键与路径[J]. 农业经济,2022(8):27-29. [ZHOU Linjie, FU Shuaixiong. The logic, key and path of solving the “three rural” problems under the rural revitalization strategy [J]. Agricultural Economy, 2022(8): 27-29]
[10] 张琦,庄甲坤,李顺强,等. 共同富裕目标下乡村振兴的科学内涵、内在关系与战略要点[J]. 西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,52(3):44-53. [ZHANG Qi, ZHUANG Jiakun, LI Shunqiang, et al. Scientific connotation, inner relationship and strategic key points of rural revitalization under the goal of common prosperity [J]. Journal of Northwest University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 52(3): 44-53] DOI: 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbsk. 2022-03-005
[11] 钟姝,李雄,张云路. 绿色发展理念引领下的乡村振兴内涵解读、实现机制和实施路径研究[J]. 中国园林,2022,38(6): 35-39. [ZHONG Shu, LI Xiong, ZHANG Yunlu. Research on the connotation interpretation, realization mechanism and implementation path of rural revitalization led by the concept of green development [J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2022, 38(6): 35-39] DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2022.06.0035
[12] 龙华楼,屠爽爽. 土地利用转型与乡村振兴[J]. 中国土地科学,2018,32(7):1-6. [LONG Hualou, TU Shuangshuang. Land use transition and rural vitalization [J]. China Land Science, 2018, 32(7): 1-6] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20180629.144201
[13] 牛子浩, 周忠发, 朱昌丽, 等. 喀斯特山区乡村性空间分异及发展类型——以贵州省盘州市为例[J]. 水土保持研究,2021,28(3):316-324. [NIU Zihao, ZHOU Zhongfa, ZHU Changli, et al. Rurality spatial distribution and types of rural development in karst mountains [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(3): 316-324] DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2021.03.034
[14] 熊鹰, 黄利华, 邹芳,等. 基于县域尺度乡村地域多功能空间分异特征及类型划分——以湖南省为例[J]. 经济地理,2021,41(6):162-170. [XIONG Ying, HUANG Lihua, ZOU Fang, et al. Multifunctional spatial characteristics of rural areas and their type identification based on county scale:A case of Hunan province [J]. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(6): 162-170] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.06.018
[15] 谢保鹏,屈雯,杨洁,等. 基于SOM的乡村振兴基础条件分区研究——以甘肃省天水市为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(9):187-197. [XIE Baopeng, QU Wen, YANG Jie, et al. Study on the basic condition zoning of rural revitalization based on SOM: Taking Tianshui city of Gansu province as an example [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2021, 42(9): 187-197] DOI: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20210920
[16] 王留鑫,赵一夫. 基于城乡融合视角的乡村振兴实现路径[J]. 宁夏社会科学,2022(1):97-102. [WANG Liuxin, ZHAO Yifu. The path to rural revitalization based on the perspective of urban-rural integration [J]. Ningxia Social Sciences, 2022(1): 97-102] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0292.2022.01.012
[17] 屠爽爽,郑瑜晗,龙花楼,等. 乡村发展与重构格局特征及振兴路径——以广西为例[J]. 地理学报,2020,75(2):365-381. [TU Shuangshuang, ZHENG Yuhan, LONG Hualou, et al. Spatio-temporal pattern of rural development and restructuring and regional path of rural vitalization in Guangxi, China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(2): 365-381] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202002011
[18] 胡航箫,戴文远,陈娟,等. 基于集聚与生态价值组合特征的乡村聚落重构——以福州山区为例[J]. 山地学报,2020,38(1):142-151. [HU Hangxiao, DAI Wenyuan, CHEN Juan, et al. A physiology of space reconstruction of rural settlements based on composite features of agglomeration effect and ecological effects: A case study of mountainous area of Fuzhou,China [J]. Mountain Research, 2020, 38(1): 142-151] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000498
[19] 刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报,2018,73(4):637-650. [LIU Yansui. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(4): 637-650] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
[20] 邓广山, 江柯. 生态约束下农户生计方式转型助推乡村振兴路径探究——以西南喀斯特地区为例[J]. 农业经济,2022(7):50-51. [DENG Guangshan, JIANG Ke. The transformation of farmers' livelihood methods under ecological constraints has promoted the exploration of rural revitalization paths [J]. Agricultural Economy, 2022(7): 50-51] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6139.2022.07.019
[21] 谭俊峰. 乡村旅游助推乡村振兴路径[J]. 社会科学家,2021(3):58-63. [TAN Junfeng. Rural tourism boosts the path of rural revitalization [J]. Social Scientist, 2021(3): 58-63] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3240.2021.03.010
[22] NONAKA A, ONO H. Revitalization of rural economies though the restructuring the self-sufficient realm: Growth in small-scale rapeseed production in Japan [J]. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, 2015, 49(4):383-390. DOI: 10.6090/jarq.49.383
[23] KAKATE T. Rural revitalization and reform of rural organizations in contemporary rural Japan [J]. Journal of Rural Problems, 2005, 4(40):393-402. DOI: 10.7310/arfe1965.40.393
[24] 韩欣宇,闫凤英. 乡村振兴背景下乡村发展综合评价及类型识别研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(9):156-165. [HAN Xinyu, YAN Fengying. Researh on the comprehensive evaluation and types recognition of rural development under rural revitalization [J]. China Population, Resource and Environment, 2019,29(9): 156-165] DOI: 10.12062/cpre.20190506
[25] 苏思信,王永生,刘彦随. 京津冀地区乡村发展格局演化规律与发展路径[J]. 地理研究,2022,41(8): 2171-2183. [SU Sixin, WANG Yongsheng, LIU Yansui. Evolution patterns and development paths of rural areas in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. Geographical Research, 2022,41(8): 2171-2183] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj02021090
[26] 吴振明. 四川新型城镇化如何走高质量路径?[J]. 四川省情,2019(12):28-30. [WU Zhenming. How does Sichuan's new urbanization take a high-quality path? [J]. Sichuan Provincial Conditions, 2019(12):28-30]
[27] 贺丹. 新时代乡村人口流动规律与社会治理的路径选择[J]. 国家行政学院学报,2018(3):26-31+153. [HE Dan. The law of rural population flow and the path choice of social governance in the new era [J]. Journal of Chinese Academy of Governance, 2018(3):26-31+153] DOI: 10.14063/j.cnki.1008-9314.20180629.004
[28] 周天琴. 乡村振兴背景下绵阳市乡村旅游可持续发展问题研究[J]. 西部旅游,2022(3):22-24. [ZHOU Tianqin. Research on sustainable development of rural tourism in Mianyang city under the background of rural revitalization [J]. Western Travel, 2022(3):22-24]
[29] 吴传均. 中国农业与农村经济可持续发展问题:不同类型地区实证研究[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2001. [WU Chuanjun. Problems of the sustainable development of agriculture and rural economy in China: Case studies of agricultural areas of different types [M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2001]
[30] 张富刚,刘彦随. 中国区域农村发展动力机制及其发展模式[J]. 地理学报,2008,63(2):115-122. [ZHANG Fugang, LIU Yansui. Dynamic mechanism and models of regional rural development in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(2): 115-122] DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2008.02.001
[31] 刘彦随,周扬,李玉恒. 中国乡村地域系统与乡村振兴战略[J]. 地理学报,2019,74(12):2511-2528. [LIU Yansui, ZHOU Yang, LI Yuheng. Rural regional system and rural revitalization strategy in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2511-2528] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201912007
[32] 杜国明, 薛濡壕,王介勇. 村域尺度乡村振兴评价及推进路径——以黑龙江省拜泉县为例[J]. 经济地理,2021, 41(8):19-27. [DU Guoming, XUE Ruhao, WANG Jieyong. Rural revitalization evaluation and promotion path based on village level: Taking Baiquan, Heilongjiang, China as a case study [J]. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(8): 19-27] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.08.003
[33] 沈剑波,王应宽,朱明,等. 乡村振兴水平评价指标体系构建及实证[J]. 农业工程学报,2020,36(3):236-243. [SHEN Jianbo, WANG Yingkuan, ZHU Ming, et al. Evaluation index system and empirical analysis of rural revitalization level [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE), 2020,36(3):236-243] DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.03.029
[34] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254. [XIE Gaodi, ZHANG Caixia, ZHANG Leiming, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254] DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.08.001
[35] GB/T 28407–2012, 农用地质量分等规程[S]. GB/T 28407-2012, Regulaiton for gradation on agriculture land quality[S].
[36] 傅聪颖,郭熙,韩逸,等. 南方丘陵区耕地自然质量与耕作条件耦合研究——以江西省奉新县为例[J]. 西南农业学报,2020,33(3):599-606. [FU Congying, GUO Xi, HAN Yi, et al. Coupling relationship between natural quality and farming conditions of cultivated land in southern hilly area of China: A case study of Fengxin county,Jiangxi province [J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 33(3): 599-606] DOI: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2020.3.020
[37] 王若思,潘洪义,刘翊涵,等. 基于动态当量的乐山市生态系统服务价值时空演变及驱动力研究[J]. 生态学报,2022,42(1):76-90. [WANG Ruosi, PAN Hongyi, LIU Yihan, et al. Evolution and driving force of ecosystem service value based on dynamic equivalent in Leshan city [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(1): 76-90] DOI: 10.5846/stxb2020012013075
[38] 刘可新,包为民,阙家骏,等. 基于主成分分析的K均值聚类法在洪水预报中的应用[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版),2015,48(4):447-450. [LIU Kexin, BAO Weimin, QUE Jiajun, et al. Application of K-mean cluster method to flood forecasting based on principal component analysis [J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2015, 48(4): 447-450] DOI: 10.14188/j.1671-8844.2015-04-003
[39] 马鑫,段刚龙,王建仁,等. 基于改进轮廓系数法的航空公司客户分群研究[J]. 运筹与管理,2021,30(1):140-146. [MA Xin, DUAN Ganglong, WANG Jianren, et al. Research on airline customer clustering based on improved silhouette coefficient method [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(1): 140-146] DOI: 10.12005/orms.2021.0020
[40] 王凯歌,栗滢超,张凤荣,等. 基于要素配置功能识别的差异化乡村发展策略[J]. 农业工程学报,2021,37(3):250-258. [WANG Kaige, LI Yingchao, ZHANG Fengrong, et al. Differentiated development strategy of rural settlements using the function identification of factor allocation [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE), 2021, 37(3): 250-258] DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.03.030
[41] 朱琳,王铁霖,夏丹. 四川省县域乡村地域功能类型识别及乡村振兴路径研究[J]. 热带地理,2021,41(4):870-880. [ZHU Lin, WANG Tielin, XIA Dan. The identification of county-level rural territorial function types and research on rural revitalization path in Sichuan province [J]. Tropical Geography, 2021, 41(4): 870-880] DOI: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003375
[42] 肖钊富,彭贤伟,李瑞,等. 乡村振兴与乡村旅游协调发展时空演变及驱动因子——以四川省为例[J]. 资源开发与市场,2022,38(1):61-68. [XIAO Zhaofu, PENG Xianwei, LI Rui, et al. Research on the spatial-temporal distribution characteristics and influencing factors of rural revitalization and rural tourism in Sichuan province [J]. Resource Development and Market, 2022, 38(1): 61-68] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2002.01.009
[43] 聂雷,王圆圆,邵子南,等. 城市土地利用效率测度及其影响因素——基于中国十大城市群的实证分析[J]. 经济问题探索,2022(2):82-93. [NIE Lei, WANG Yuanyuan, SHAO Zinan, et al. Measurement and influencing factors of urban land use efficiency: An empirical analysis based on ten Chinese urban agglomerations [J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2022(2): 82-93]

相似文献/References:

[1]熊 熙,张仕超*,梁靖茹,等.丘陵山区家庭农场时空拓展特征及驱动力分析——以重庆市江津区为例[J].山地学报,2021,(1):71.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000577]
　XIONG Xi,ZHANG Shichao*,LIANG Jingru,et al.Spatiotemporal Expansion Characteristics and Driving Forces of Family Farms in Hilly and Mountainous Areas: A Case Study of Jiangjin District of Chongqing, China[J].Mountain Research,2021,(5):71.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000577]
[2]郑光辉,蒋涤非,栾永飞,等.乡村振兴背景下的贵州农业产业空间分异[J].山地学报,2021,(3):429.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000608]
　ZHENG Guanghui,JIANG Difei,LUAN Yongfei,et al.Spatial Differentiation of Agricultural Industry in Guizhou Province of China under Rural Revitalization[J].Mountain Research,2021,(5):429.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000608]
[3]邓 伟,张少尧,王占韵,等.乡村振兴:山村发展路径与模式的科学探究[J].山地学报,2022,(6):791.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000713]
　DENG Wei,ZHANG Shaoyao,WANG Zhangyun,et al.Rural Revitalization in China: Scientific Inquiry into the Development Path and Mode of Mountain Villages[J].Mountain Research,2022,(5):791.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000713]
[4]周达宝a,b,徐丽婷a,等.脱贫地区乡村振兴水平时空演变及障碍因子——以江西罗霄山区为例[J].山地学报,2024,(1):81.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000806]
　ZHOU Dabaoa,b,XU Litinga,et al.Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Rural Revitalization Level and Its Obstacle Factors in Poverty-Alleviation Regions: A Case Study of the Luoxiao Mountains Region in Jiangxi Province, China[J].Mountain Research,2024,(5):81.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000806]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2022-07-23; 改回日期(Accepted date):2022-10-13
基金项目(Foundation item): 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金(18XJA630005); 国家自然科学基金(42071222)。[Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China(18XJA630005); National Natural Science Foundation of China(42071222)]
作者简介(Biography): 唐玉萍(1997-),女,四川宜宾人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:土地利用与土地评价。[TANG Yuping(1997-), female, born in Yibin, Sichuan province, M.Sc. candidate, research on land use and land evaluation] E-mail: tangyuping97@163.com
*通讯作者(Corresponding author): 潘洪义(1980-),男,河北唐山人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向:土地利用与土地评价。[PAN Hongyi(1980-), male, born in Tangshan, Hebei province, Ph.D., associate professor, research on land use and land evaluation] E-mail: panhongyi80@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-10-30