[1]李立华,雷若然,杜 杰,等.生态文明视角的九寨沟景观资源美学认识[J].山地学报,2021,(5):745-755.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000635)]
　LI Lihua,LEI Ruoran,DU Jie,et al.Aesthetic Understanding of Landscape Resources at Jiuzhaigou Valley, China from a Perspective of Ecological Civilization[J].Mountain Research,2021,(5):745-755.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000635)]
点击复制

生态文明视角的九寨沟景观资源美学认识()
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2021年第5期
页码:
745-755
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2021-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Aesthetic Understanding of Landscape Resources at Jiuzhaigou Valley, China from a Perspective of Ecological Civilization
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2021)5-745-11
作者:
李立华1; 雷若然1; 2; 杜 杰3; 王 浩1; 2
1.中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,成都 610041; 2.中国科学院大学,北京100049; 3.九寨沟风景名胜区管理局, 四川 阿坝藏族羌族自治州 623402
Author(s):
LI Lihua1;  LEI Ruoran1; 2;  DU Jie3;  WANG Hao1; 2
1. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041,China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Jiuzhaigou Valley Scenic Area Administration, Tibetan Qiang Autonomous Prefecture of Ngawa 623402, Sichuan, China
关键词:
生态文明;  景观;  美学;  认识;  九寨沟
Keywords:
ecological civilization;  landscape;  aesthetic;  congnition;  Jiuzhaigou
分类号:
P901
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000635)
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
生态文明建设凸显了深化景观资源美学认识的需求,重新认识九寨沟景观资源美学价值对于其震后恢复重建意义重大。文章介绍了与景观资源美学价值相关的美学哲学认识,以及基于神经美学中美学科学的新理论和新方法,以在中文旅游网站爬取的九寨沟游记和旅游评论作为文本语料,利用文本挖掘对九寨沟景观资源的美学特征进行定量化的分析评价。结果发现:(1)九寨沟景观具有三大美学特征,分别为景观美学要素的多样性特征、景观美学地点的代表性特性和景观美学机制的丰富性特征;(2)景观美学要素多样性特征既体现在湖水、瀑布、海子、色彩、阳光等自然要素,也体现在栈道、栈桥等人工要素;(3)景观美学地点代表性特征主要体现在五花海、珍珠滩瀑布、火花海;(4)景观美学机制的丰富性特征体既体现在美学法则机制,包括颜色美学类、对称美学类、隐喻美学类、整体观与贝叶斯美学类,又体现在美学空间机制,包括近距离的漂亮美学、远距离的崇高美学、近中距离的画面美学。据此,文章最后从美学视角,对九寨沟景区景观资源的保护与利用以及生态文明建设提出部分对策与建议,并特别建议最大自然化地按照原样恢复重建震毁的火花海景点。
Abstract:
Ecological civilization construction deeply highlights the recognition of the aesthetic attributes and values of landscape resources. The recovery and reconstruction of earthquake damaged scenic spots from 2017 in Jiuzhaigou, a World Heritage Site, is currently of great significance. In the preface of this article, the current understanding of aesthetic philosophy related to landscape resources was briefly reviewed, and, in particular, some recent scientific theories and methods originating in neuroaesthetics were introduced. In the subsequent parts, data and a text corpus from the travel notes and tourism comments were collected from 2010 to 2020, using Python, from tourism websites in Chinese based on the keyword of Jiuzhaigou. Neuropoetic induced methodology of words frequency statistics, aesthetic attributes, and the values of landscape resources in Jiuzhaigou scenic area were then applied and quantitatively analyzed and assessed. Some novel findings and understandings are as follows:(1)There were three types of aesthetic attributes of landscape resources in Jiuzhaigou, the diversity of landscape aesthetic elements, the identity of landscape aesthetic sites, and the richness of the landscape aesthetic mechanism, and their corresponding word frequency weights were 38.73%, 22.44% and 38.38%;(2)Diversity attribute was reflected not only in natural elements, such as water, waterfalls, lakes, color, and sunshine, but also in artificial elements such as plank roads and trestles;(3)Identity attribute was reflected in some outstanding aesthetic sites, according to word frequency, which reflected a degree of significance, they were, in order, the Five Flowers Sea and the Pearl Beach Waterfall and Spark Sea, followed by the Colorful Pool, the Reed Sea, the Nuorilang Waterfall, the Arrow Bamboo Sea, the Shuzheng Waterfall, the Panda Sea, the Peacock River, the Tiger Sea, and the Rhinoceros Sea; and(4)The richness of the landscape aesthetic mechanism was reflected in two categories—the aesthetic laws mechanism, which includes color aesthetics, symmetry aesthetics, metaphor aesthetics, holistic view, and Bayesian aesthetics, and the aesthetic space mechanism, including short-distance beauty aesthetics, long-distance sublime aesthetics, and middle-distance picturesque aesthetics. The final part of this article, therefore, provided some countermeasures and suggestions, from the perspective of aesthetics, to the protection, conservation, and utilization of landscape resources for sustainable tourism development in the framework of ecological civilization. A particular focus was on the Spark Sea scenic area, which an earthquake damaged in 2017, and its restoration and reconstruction based on natural features and previous patterns as much as possible because of its leading aesthetic identity in Jiuzhaigou

参考文献/References:

[1] 卢风. “生态文明”概念辨析 [J]. 晋阳学刊, 2017(5): 63-70. [LU Feng. A clarification of the concept of “ecological civilization” [J]. Academic Journal of Jinyang, 2017(5): 63-70] DOI:10.16392/j.cnki.14-1057/c.2017.05.009
[2] 黄娟, 陈军. 生态文明:概念体系与内在逻辑 [J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 12(4): 26-30. [HUANG Juan, CHEN Jun. Ecological civilization: Conceptual system and inner logic [J]. Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 12(4): 26-30] DOI:10.16493/j.cnki.42-1627/c.2012.04.014
[3] 赵景柱. 关于生态文明建设与评价的理论思考 [J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(15): 4552-4555. [ZHAO Jingzhu. Theoretical considerations on ecological civilization development and assessment [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2013, 33(15): 4552-4555] DOI: 10.5846/stxb201306201740
[4] 谌贻琴. 全力写好“绿水青山就是金山银山”这篇大文章 [J]. 求是, 2016(22): 56-58. [CHEN Yiqin. Make efforts to act according to the national policy of “green mountains and clear water are as good as mountains of gold and silver” [J]. Qiushi, 2016(22): 56-58]
[5] 胡咏君, 谷树忠. “绿水青山就是金山银山”:生态资产的价值化与市场化 [J]. 湖州师范学院学报, 2015, 37(11): 22-25. [HU Yongjun, GU Shuzhong. “Clear water and green hills are gold and silver mountains”: Valuable and marketable ecological assets [J]. Journal of Huzhou University, 2015, 37(11): 22-25] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1734.2015.11.005
[6] 曾繁仁. 当代生态文明视野中的生态美学观 [J]. 文学评论, 2005(4): 48-55. [ZENG Fanren. Ecological aesthetics in the vision of contemporary ecological civilization [J]. Literary Review, 2005(4): 48-55] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-624X.2014.03.040
[7] 王京华. 生态文明视野下生态美学的意义 [J]. 前沿, 2008(3): 78-80. [WANG Jinghua. The significance of ecological aesthetics from the perspective of ecological civilization [J]. Forward Position, 2008(3): 78-80] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8267.2008.03.024
[8] 章家恩. 生态美学与生态文明建设 [J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 15(1): 127-131. [ZHANG Jiaen. On ecological aesthetics and ecological civilization construction [J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 15(1): 127-131] DOI: 10.16822/j.cnki.hitskb.2013.01.020
[9] KOSANIC A, PETZOLD J. A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing [J]. Ecosystem Services, 2020,45: 101168. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101168
[10] 赵士洞, 张永民. 生态系统与人类福祉——千年生态系统评估的成就、贡献和展望 [J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(9): 895-902. [ZHAO Shidong, ZHANG Yongmin. Ecosystems and human well-being:The achievements, contributions and prospects of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment [J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2006,21(9): 895-902] DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2006.09.002
[11] 张永民, 赵士洞. 千年生态系统评估项目的后续计划——将知识转化为行动的全球战略 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(3): 522-528. [ZHANG Yongmin, ZHAO Shidong. The millennium ecosystem assessment follow-up: A global strategy for turning knowledge into action [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(3): 522-528] DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.03.017
[12] HANSEN M H, LI H, SVARVERUD R. Ecological civilization: Interpreting the Chinese past, projecting the global future [J]. Global Environmental Change, 2018, 53:195-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.014
[13] HEURTEBISE J Y. Sustainability and ecological civilization in the age of anthropocene: An epistemological analysis of the psychosocial and “culturalist” interpretations of global environmental risks [J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(8): 1331. DOI: 10.3390/su9081331
[14] ZHANG Wei, LI Hulin, AN Xuebing. Ecological civilization construction is the fundamental way to develop low-carbon economy [J]. Energy Procedia, 2011,5(1): 839-843. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.148
[15] 马彦红, 袁青, 冷红. 生态系统服务视角下的景观美学服务评价研究综述与启示 [J]. 中国园林, 2017, 33(6): 99-103. [MA Yanhong, YUAN Qing, LENG Hong. Review and enlightenment of landscape aesthetics service evaluation from the perspective of ecosystem service [J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2017, 33(6): 99-103]
[16] SEPNMAA Y. Human nature and aesthetic ecosystem services: Nature in the service of humankind and humankind in the service of nature [J]. Contemporary Aesthetics, 2016, 14(1): 11.
[17] ARETANO R, PETROSILLO I, ZACCARELLI N, et al. People perception of landscape change effects on ecosystem services in small Mediterranean islands: A combination of subjective and objective assessments [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013, 112: 63-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.010
[18] SCHIRPKE U, TIMMERMANN F, TAPPEINER U, et al. Cultural ecosystem services of mountain regions: Modelling the aesthetic value [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 69: 78-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.001
[19] HERMES J, ALBERT C, HAAREN C V. Assessing the aesthetic quality of landscapes in Germany [J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 31:296-307. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.015
[20] SCHIRPKE U, TASSER E, TAPPEINER U. Predicting scenic beauty of mountain regions [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013,111: 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.11.010
[21] LOTHIAN A. Scenic perceptions of the visual effects of wind farms on south Australian landscapes [J]. Geographical Research, 2008, 46(2): 196-207. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2008.00510.x
[22] LOTHIAN A. World's best landscapes project [R/OL]. Australia: Scenic Solutions, 2016: 1-61[2021-6-9]. https://scenicsolutions.world/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/world-best-landscapes-report.pdf
[23] LOTHIAN A. The science of scenery: How we view scenic beauty, what it is, why we love it, and how to measure and map it [M]. The United States: CreateSpace, 2017.
[24] NICOLSON M H. Mountain gloom and mountain glory: The development of the aesthetics of the infinite [J]. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 1960, 19(1): 108-109. DOI: 10.2307/427427
[25] REES R. The taste for mountain scenery [J]. History Today, 1975, 25(5): 350-312.
[26] WYLIE J. Landscape [M]. London: Routledge, 2007.
[27] COSGROVE D. Landscape and the European sense of sight-eyeing nature [G] // ANDERSON K, DOMOSH M, PILE S, et al. Handbook of cultural geography. London: SAGE, 2003: 249-268. DOI: 10.4135/9781848608252.n17
[28] HINCHLIFFE S. “Inhabiting” - landscapes and natures [G] // ANDERSON K, DOMOSH M, PILE S, et al. Handbook of cultural geography. London: SAGE, 2003: 207-225. DOI: 10.4135/9781848608252.n14
[29] 杨春时. 论生态美学的主体间性 [J]. 贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2004(1): 81-84. [YANG Chunshi. On intersubjectivity of ecoaesthetics [J]. Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences), 2004(1): 81-84] DOI: 10.16614/j.cnki.issn1001-733x.2004.01.017
[30] PROBYN E. The spatial imperative of subjectivity [G] // ANDERSON K, DOMOSH M, PILE S, et al. Handbook of cultural geography. London: SAGE, 2003: 290-299. DOI: 10.4135/9781848608252.n20
[31] LOTHIAN A. Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: Is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder? [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1999, 44(4): 177-198. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00019-5
[32] CARLSON A. Aesthetic appreciation of nature and environ-mentalism [J]. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 2011,69: 137-155. DOI: 10.1017/S1358246111000257
[33] BROWN S, GAO X, TISDELLE L, et al. Naturalizing aesthetics: Brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities [J]. NeuroImage, 2011,58(1):250-258. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.012
[34] VELARDE M, FRY G, TVEIT M. Health effects of viewing landscapes-landscape types in environmental psychology [J]. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2007, 6(4): 199-212. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.001
[35] ZEKI S. Art and the brain [J]. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 1999, 6(6-7): 76-96.
[36] ZEKI S, BARTELS A. Toward a theory of visual consciousness [J]. Consciousness and Cognition, 1999, 8(2): 225-259. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.001
[37] RAMACHANDRAN V S, HIRSTEIN W. The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience [J]. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 1999, 6(6-7): 15-51.
[38] JACOBS A M. Quantifying the beauty of words: A neurocognitive poetics perspective [J]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2017, 11(622): 1-7. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00622
[39] DANIEL T C, BOSTER R S. Measuring landscape esthetics: The scenic beauty estimation method [M]. Colorado: Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1976.
[40] STAMPS A E. Demographic effects in environmental aesthetics: A meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Planning Literature, 1999, 14(2): 155-175. DOI: 10.1177/08854129922092630
[41] STAMPS A E. Use of photographs to simulate environments: A meta-analysis [J]. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1990, 71(3): 907-913. DOI: 10.1177/08854129922092630
[42] 风笑天. 方法论背景中的问卷调查法 [J]. 社会学研究, 1994(3): 13-81. [FENG Xiaotian. Questionnaire survey method in the context of methodology [J]. Sociological Studies, 1994(3): 13-18] DOI: 10.19934/j.cnki.shxyj.1994.03.004
[43] GRAVES C W. Human nature prepares for a momentous leap [J]. The Futurist, 1974, 8(2): 72-87.
[44] BARLOW H B. Why have multiple cortical areas? [J]. Vision Research, 1986, 26(1):81-90. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90072-6
[45] DONALDSON C, GREGORY I N, TAYLOR J E. Locating the beautiful, picturesque, sublime and majestic: Spatially analysing the application of aesthetic terminology in descriptions of the English Lake District [J]. Journal of Historical Geography, 2017, 56: 43-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhg.2017.01.006

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2021-06-11; 改回日期(Accepted date):2021-10-20
基金项目(Foundation item):国家自然科学基金(41071091); 九寨沟灾后重建先导项目(Y9D2130130)。[National Natural Science Foundation of China(41071091); Priority Research Program of Jiuzhaigou Post-Disaster Reconstruction(Y9D2130130)]
作者简介(Biography):李立华(1964-),男,湖北应城人,博士,研究员,主要研究方向:山地旅游与山区发展 。[ LI Lihua(1964-)male, born in Yingcheng, Hubei province, Ph.D., professor, research on mountain tourism and mountain development] E-mail: Lilh@imde.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-09-30