[1]熊俊楠a*,曹依帆a,孙 铭,等.基于GIS和熵权法的滑坡作用下的长输油气管道易损性评价[J].山地学报,2020,(5):717-725.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000549]
 XIONG Junana*,CAO Yifana,SUN Ming,et al.Vulnerability Evaluation of Long-Distance Oil and Gas Pipelines under Landslide Actions Based on GIS and Entropy Weight Method[J].Mountain Research,2020,(5):717-725.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000549]
点击复制

基于GIS和熵权法的滑坡作用下的长输油气管道易损性评价
分享到:

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2020年第5期
页码:
717-725
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-11-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Vulnerability Evaluation of Long-Distance Oil and Gas Pipelines under Landslide Actions Based on GIS and Entropy Weight Method
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2020)5-717-09
作者:
熊俊楠1a*曹依帆1a孙 铭2王迎兵3雍志玮1b
1.西南石油大学 a.土木工程与测绘学院; b.地球科学与技术学院,成都 610500; 2.四川省第一测绘工程院,成都 610100; 3.成都市华丰工程勘察设计有限公司 成都 610041
Author(s):
XIONG Junan1a* CAO Yifan1a SUN Ming2 WANG Yingbing3 YONG Zhiwei1b
1. a. School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics; b. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China; 2. The First Surveying and Mapping Institute of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610100, China; 3. Chengdu Huafeng Engineering Survey and Design Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610041, China
关键词:
滑坡 输油管道 熵权法 易损性评价
Keywords:
landslide pipeline entropy weight method vulnerability evaluation
分类号:
X43
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000549
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
开展滑坡作用下的长输油气管道易损性评价,对于管道建设中的决策制定及防灾减灾具有重要意义。以兰州—成都—重庆(兰成渝)输油管道广元段实地调查测量数据为依托,从管道与滑坡空间关系、管道本体两方面出发,选取管道缺陷密度、管道壁厚、管道埋深、管道与斜坡单元夹角、管道位置等9个评价指标,基于ArcGIS、MATLAB软件平台和熵权赋值理论,进行管道易损性定量评价,并提出相应的管理建议。研究结果表明:(1)管道缺陷密度、管道壁厚、管道与斜坡单元夹角的熵权值分别为0.679、0.154、0.102,是对管道易损性影响最大的三个因子;(2)低易损性、中易损性、高易损性和极高易损性的管段数量占比分别为66.66%、20.56%、12.22%、0.56%,长度占比分别为62.06%、25.72%、12.11%、0.11%;(3)研究区北部的管道易损性等级较低,南部的易损性等级较高,高和极高易损性管道主要分布于下寺镇及宝轮镇。评价结果较好地反映了研究区内管道易损度现状,可为研究区管道管理及其他类似区域管道线路规划提供可靠参考。
Abstract:
Landslides are one of the most popular geohazards threatening pipeline engineering in China. For the purpose of decision-making and geohazard prevention and control in pipeline construction, it is of great significance to evaluate the vulnerability of long-distance oil and gas pipelines subjected to landslides.In this research, it conducted field survey on geohazards along the Guangyuan section of the Lanzhou-Chengdu-Chongqing(Lan-Cheng-Yu)oil pipeline. In terms of the spatial relationship between pipelines and landslides, and the physical properties of pipelines, 9 evaluation indexes including pipeline defect density, pipe wall thickness, buried depth of pipeline, the angle between pipeline and slope, pipeline position, etc. were selected to make an quantitative evaluation on pipeline vulnerability and grade division based on ArcGIS, MATLAB software platform and entropy weight theory; therefore it proposed the corresponding management strategy. The results showed that:(1)the values of entropy weights for pipeline defect density, pipe wall thickness and the angle between pipeline and slope were 0.679, 0.154 and 0.102 respectively; All of the three indexes had the greatest influence on pipeline vulnerability;(2)The pipeline sections with low, medium, high and very high vulnerability accounted for 66.66%, 20.56%, 12.22% and 0.56%, respectively; Accordingly the length accounted for 62.06%, 25.72%, 12.11% and 0.11%, respectively;(3)The pipeline vulnerability level in the north of the study area was low, but in the south was high. The pipelines with high and very high vulnerability were mainly distributed in Xiasi Town and Baolun Town. In view of this part of the pipeline, we recommend that increase the prevention and control engineering, carry out the real time monitoring, and achieve timely maintenance.The evaluation results fairly match with current reality of pipeline vulnerability in the study area, and can provide a reliable reference for pipeline management in the study area and pipeline route planning in other similar areas.

参考文献/References:

[1] 霍峰,王玮,曹永利,等.跨越发展的中国油气储运建设技术及未来走向[J].石油科技论坛,2016, 35(3): 44-51. [HUO Feng, WANG Wei, CAO Yongli, et al. China's Construction Technology of Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation and Its Future Development Direction[J]. Oil Forum, 2016, 35(3): 44-51]
[2] 郭长宝,唐杰,吴瑞安,等.基于证据权模型的川藏铁路加查——朗县段滑坡易发性评价[J].山地学报,2019, 37(2): 240-251. [GUO Changbao, TANG Jie, WU Ruian, et al. Landslide susceptibility assessment based on WOE model along Jiacha —Langxian County section of Sichuan— Tibet Railway,China[J]. Mountain Research, 2019, 37(2): 240-251]
[3]孙铭. 基于GIS的输油管道滑坡地质灾害风险评价[D]. 成都:西南石油大学,2017:57-70. [SUN Ming. Risk assessment of geological hazard of oil pipeline landslide based on GIS [D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2017: 57-70]
[4] 赖书名,胡勇生.广元宝珠村滑坡工程地质特征及成因机制研究[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2018, 29(3): 43-48. [LAI Shuming, HU Yongsheng. Engineering Geological Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Baozhu Landslide in Guangyuan[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation, 2018, 29(3): 43-48]
[5] YANG Jintao, SONG Chao, YANG Yang, et al. New method for landslide susceptibility mapping supported by spatial logistic regression and GeoDetector: a case study of Duwen Highway Basin, Sichuan Province, China[J]. Geomorphology, 2018, 324: 62-71.
[6] MANSOUR M F, MORGENSTERN N R, MARTIN C D. Expected damage from displacement of slow-moving slides[J]. Landslides, 2010, 8(1): 117-131.
[7] 唐波,刘希林.国外城市灾害易损性研究进展[J].世界地理研究,2016, 25(1): 75-82. [TANG Bo, LIU Xilin. Review of analysis on vulnerability of urban disasters[J]. World Regional Studies, 2016, 25(1): 75-82]
[8] 郭跃.自然灾害的社会易损性及其影响因素研究[J].灾害学,2010, 25(1): 84-88. [GUO Yue. A study on social vulnerability to natural hazards and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2010, 25(1): 84-88]
[9] 丁朋朋,杨宗佶,游勇,等.川藏铁路沿线滑坡灾害易损性评价[J].铁道建筑,2017, 57(8): 133-138. [DING Pengpeng, YANG Zongji, YOU Yong, et al. Vulnerability evaluation on landslide hazards to Sichuan -Tibet railway[J]. Railway Engineering, 2017, 57(8): 133-138]
[10] 宁成千,黄莉莉.埋地燃气管道易损性的模糊综合评价[J].内蒙古石油化工,2012, 38(9): 71-73. [NING Chengqian, HUANG Lili. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of vulnerability of buried gas pipeline[J]. Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry, 2012, 38(9): 71-73]
[11] WU T H, TANG W H, EINSTEIN H H. Landslides: investigation and mitigation, chapter 6 – landslide hazard and risk assessment [M]. Transportation Research Board, 1996: 106-118.
[12] XIONG Junnan, LI Jin, CHENG Weiming, et al. A GIS-based support vector machine model for flash flood vulnerability assessment and mapping in China[J].International Journal of Geo-Information, 2019, 8(7): 297.
[13] 刘迎春,石云山,卢启春,等.基于指标评分法的单体管道地质灾害风险评价——以土质滑坡为例[J].天然气技术与经济,2015, 9(3): 57-61. [LIU Yingchun, SHI Yunshan, LU Qichun, et al. Risk assessment of geological disasters in single pipe based on scoring index method: a case study of soil landslide[J]. Natural Gas Technology and Economy, 2015, 9(3): 57-61]
[14] 刘洋洋,李永强,李有鹏,等.基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的山区丘陵公路灾害易损性研究——以河南省修武县为例[J].灾害学,2017, 32(2): 32-38. [LIU Yangyang, LI Yongqiang, LI Youpeng, et al. Research of highway disaster vulnerability based on AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method: a case study of Xiuwu county in Henan province[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2017, 32(2): 32-38]
[15] 田述军,孔纪名.基于斜坡单元和公路功能的滑坡风险评价[J].山地学报,2013, 31(5): 580-587. [TIAN Shujun, KONG Jiming. Risk assessment of landslide based on slope unit and highway function[J]. Mountain Research, 2013, 31(5): 580-587]
[16] 冯文凯,张涛,张誉瀚.显石寨村管道滑坡形成机制及管道易损性评价[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2014, 25(2): 83-88. [FENG Wenkai, ZHANG Tao, ZHANG Yuhan. Evaluating the stability of landslides in Xianshizhai village and the pipeline vulnerability with their action[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation, 2014, 25(2): 83-88]
[17] 严琨,沈锐利,李琦.大型悬索跨越结构地震易损性分析[J].四川建筑科学研究,2014, 40(6): 83-87. [YAN Kun, SHEN Ruili, LI Qi. Seismic vulnerability analysis for the long-span suspension cable pipeline aerial crossing structure[J]. Sichuan Building Science, 2014, 40(6): 83-87]
[18] 徐士彬,钱德玲,姚兰飞,等.路基遭受泥石流灾害的易损性评价[J].水土保持通报,2016, 36(5): 235-241. [XU Shibin, QIAN Deling, YAO Lanfei, et al. Evaluation of vulnerability of subgrade suffering from debris flow disasters[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 36(5): 235-241]
[19] 刘兴荣,杨军,颉丽.泥石流对兰成渝输油管道的危害及防治[J].甘肃科学学报,2009, 21(1): 88-92. [LIU Xingrong, YANG Jun, XIE Li. The hazards of debris flow to oil transporting pipelines in Lan-Cheng-Yu[J]. Journal of Gansu Sciences, 2009, 21(1): 88-92]
[20] 熊俊楠,孙明远,孙铭.基于GIS及耦合协调原理的长输管道山洪泥石流风险性评价[J].天然气工业,2019, 39(3): 116-124. [XIONG Junnan, SUN Mingyuan, SUN Ming. Risk assessment on mountain torrents and debris flows along long-distance pipelines based on the GIS and coupling-coordination principle[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(3): 116-124]
[21] XIONG Junnan, SUN Ming, ZHANG Hao, et al. Application of the Levenburg–Marquardt back propagation neural network approach for landslide risk assessments [J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2019, 19(3): 629-653.
[22] 李世元,简季,吴章生,等.广元市地质环境管理数据库系统设计[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2012, 23(3): 36-42. [LI Shiyuan, JIAN Ji, WU Zhangsheng, et al. A design of the Geo-environment management database system for Guangyuan city[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation, 2012, 23(3): 36-42]
[23] XU Hongshi, MA Chao, LIAN Jijian, et al. Urban flooding risk assessment based on an integrated k-means cluster algorithm and improved entropy weight method in the region of Haikou, China [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 563: 975-986.
[24] 郭磊,项卫东,刘英男,等.基于熵权法的新建长输天然气管道易损性评价[J].油气储运,2015, 34(4): 373-376. [GUO Lei, XIANG Weidong, LIU Yingnan, et al. Vulnerability assessment on new long-distance gas pipeline based on entropy method[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2015, 34(4): 373-376]
[25] 宁娜,舒和平,刘东飞,等.基于熵权和模糊评判的单沟泥石流危险性评价[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2014, 50(3): 369-375. [NING Na, SHU Heping, LIU Dongfei, et al. Hazard assessment of debris flow based on the entropy weight method and fuzzy evaluation method[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University(Natural Sciences), 2014, 50(3): 369-375]
[26] 熊俊楠,曹依帆,程维明,等.福建省山洪灾害危险性评价[J].山地学报,2019, 37(4): 538-550. [XIONG Junnan, CAO Yifan, CHENG Weiming, et al. Risk assessment of mountain torrent disasters in Fujian province, China[J]. Mountain Research, 2019, 37(4): 538-550]
[27] 包美玲,尹红.基于SPSS研究分析我国居民人均消费结构[J].软件,2018, 39(12): 136-140. [BAO Meiling, YIN Hong. Analysis of Per Capita consumption structure of Chinese residents based on SPSS[J]. Computer Engineering & Software, 2018, 39(12): 136-140]
[28] 郝建斌,刘建平,荆宏远,等.横穿状态下滑坡对管道推力的计算[J].石油学报,2012, 33(6): 1093-1097. [HAO Jianbin, LIU Jianping, JING Hongyuan, et al. A calculation of landslide thrust force to transverse pipelines[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(6): 1093-1097]

相似文献/References:

[1]蒋志林,朱静,常鸣,等.汶川地震区红椿沟泥石流形成物源量动态演化特征[J].山地学报,2014,(01):81.
 JIANG Zhilin,ZHU Jing,CHANG Ming,et al.Dynamic Evolution Characteristics of Hongchun Gully Source Area of Debris Flow in Wenchuan Earthquake Region[J].Mountain Research,2014,(5):81.
[2]常鸣,唐川,蒋志林,等.强震区都江堰市龙池镇泥石流物源的遥感动态演变[J].山地学报,2014,(01):89.
 CHANG Ming,TANG Chuan,JIANG Zhilin,et al.Dynamic Evolution Process of Sediment Supply for Debris Flow Occurrence in Longchi of Dujiangyan,Wenchuan Earthquake Area[J].Mountain Research,2014,(5):89.
[3]白永健,倪化勇,王运生,等.喜德采书组“8?31”滑坡工程地质特征及运动过程[J].山地学报,2014,(03):327.
 BAI Yongjian,NI Huayong,WANG Yusheng,et al.Engineering Geological Characteristics and Motor Process of Caishu Landslide in Xide of Sichuan,China[J].Mountain Research,2014,(5):327.
[4]王东坡,何思明,葛胜锦,等.“9?07”彝良地震诱发次生山地灾害调查及减灾建议[J].山地学报,2013,(01):101.
 WANG Dongpo,HE Siming,GE Shengjin,et al.Mountain Hazards Induced by the Earthquake of Sep 07,2012 in Yiliang and the Suggestions of Disaster Reduction[J].Mountain Research,2013,(5):101.
[5]崔鹏,陈晓清,张建强,等.“4·20”芦山7.0级地震次生山地灾害活动特征与趋势[J].山地学报,2013,(03):257.
 CUI Peng,CHEN Xiaoqing,ZHANG Jianqiang,et al.Activities and Tendency of Mountain Hazards Induced by the Ms7.0 Lushan Earthquake,April 20,2013[J].Mountain Research,2013,(5):257.
[6]田述军,孔纪名.基于斜坡单元和公路功能的滑坡风险评价[J].山地学报,2013,(05):580.
 TIAN Shujun,KONG Jiming.Risk Assessment of Landslide Based on Slope Unit and Highway Function[J].Mountain Research,2013,(5):580.
[7]王秀丽,唐亚.树木地貌学在地质灾害研究中的应用[J].山地学报,2014,(06):761.
 WANG Xiuli,TANG Ya.Application of Dendrogeomorphology in the Research of Geological Disasters[J].Mountain Research,2014,(5):761.
[8]方丹,胡卓玮,王志恒,等.基于GIS的北川县地震次生滑坡灾害空间预测[J].山地学报,2012,(02):230.
 FANG Dan,HU Zhuowei,WANG Zhiheng.Spatial Prediction of EarthquakeInduced Secondary Landslide Disaster in Beichuan County Based on GIS[J].Mountain Research,2012,(5):230.
[9]常鸣,唐川,李为乐,等.汶川地震区绵远河流域泥石流形成区的崩塌滑坡特征[J].山地学报,2012,(05):561.
 River Basin,ChinaCHANG Ming,TANG Chuan,et al.The Characteristic of Collapse and Landslide by Wenchuan Earthquake in Debris Flow for Mative Region along the Mianyuan[J].Mountain Research,2012,(5):561.
[10]彭永良,郭得令,胡卸文,等.河北省宽城县某滑坡特征与稳定性评价[J].山地学报,2011,(05):591.
 PENG Yongliang,GUO Deling,et al.Characteristics and Stability Analysis of a Landslide in Kuancheng County, Hebei Province[J].Mountain Research,2011,(5):591.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2018-12-04; 改回日期(Accepted date): 2020-07-30
基金项目(Foundation item):中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA20030302); 水科院全国山洪灾害调查评价项目(SHZH-IWHR-57); 数字福建自然灾害监测大数据研究所开放课题(NDMBD2018003); 西南石油大学科技创新团队项目(2017CXTD09)。[Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA20030302); National Mountain Flood Disaster Investigation Project of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower(SHZH-IWHR-57); Open Fund of Big Data Institute of Digital Natural Disaster Monitoring in Fujian(NDMBD2018003); Innovation Team Projects of Southwest Petroleum University of Science and Technology(2017CXTD09)]
作者简介(Biography):熊俊楠(1981-),男,四川南充人,博士,教授,主要研究方向:地理信息系统与灾害风险分析。[XIONG Junnan(1981-), male, born in Nanchong, Sichuan province, Ph.D., professor, mainly engaged in the research on GIS and disaster risk analysis] E-mail: neu_xjn@163. com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-30