[1]任瑞萍a,b.五台山风景名胜区旅游流空间结构研究[J].山地学报,2020,(3):461-472.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000525]
 REN Ruiping a,b.Study on Spatial Structure of Tourist Flows in the Wutai Mountains Scenic Area of China[J].Mountain Research,2020,(3):461-472.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000525]
点击复制

五台山风景名胜区旅游流空间结构研究()
分享到:

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2020年第3期
页码:
461-472
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2020-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on Spatial Structure of Tourist Flows in the Wutai Mountains Scenic Area of China
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2020)3-461-12
作者:
任瑞萍ab
忻州师范学院 a.旅游管理系; b.区域发展研究协同创新中心,山西 忻州 034000
Author(s):
REN Ruiping ab
Xinzhou Normal University, a. Department of Tourism Management; b. Regional Development Research Collaborative Innovation Center, Shanxi Xinzhou 034000, China
关键词:
旅游流 空间分布 网络结构 网络游记 景区 小尺度
Keywords:
tourist flows spatial distribution network structure travel notes scenic area small scale
分类号:
F590
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000525
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
旅游流空间结构特征是旅游者在旅游活动中的空间状态,能够反映出一定区域内旅游要素的空间组织形态,对其进行研究可为旅游活动管理提供指导。本文以五台山风景名胜区旅游流空间结构为研究对象,利用旅游网站平台获取642篇有效游记,采用内容分析法从中提取出研究所需的旅游线路,利用地图分析法对景区旅游流的空间分布规律进行了研究,利用社会网络分析法研究了景区的旅游流网络结构特征。研究发现:(1)五台山景区单景点旅游流主要分布在台怀镇核心区的黛螺顶、显通寺、塔院寺和五爷庙4个景点。多景点旅游流主要分布在台怀镇内的“一区七点”。显通寺和塔院寺、菩萨顶和显通寺、五爷庙和塔院寺三对节点间的旅游流流量位居前列;(2)五台山景区旅游流网络规模为54,密度为0.19,点度中心势为0.43;(3)五台山景区旅游流网络节点中,黛螺顶、罗睺寺和西台为起点,黛螺顶、显通寺、菩萨顶、罗睺寺、殊像寺、塔院寺和五爷庙为核心节点,终点包括菩萨顶和龙泉寺; 中介点包括黛螺顶和五个台顶; 黛螺顶、北台、南台和南山寺占据着结构洞位置。通过研究为五台山景区合理布局旅游设施、规划旅游路线和高峰期旅游容量的控制等提供理论依据,同时弥补景区尺度旅游流空间结构研究方面的不足。
Abstract:
The spatial structure characteristics of tourist flows are the spatial state of tourists in tourism activities, which can reflect the spatial organization of tourism elements in a certain region, and the research on it can provide guidance for tourism activity management. Based on 642 valid travel notes collected from travel website platforms, this study analyzed the characteristics of spatial distribution and network structure of tourist flows in Wutai Mountains Scenic Area. In these travel notes, tourist routes were extracted by content analysis method. According to these tourist routes, cartographic representation method was used to identify the spatial distribution regularity of tourist flows and social network analysis method is employed to measure the network structure characteristics of these tourist flows. The results included three aspects. Firstly, in terms of spatial distribution regularity, there were distinctions between tourist flows visiting one scenic spot and visiting multiple scenic spots. The former was mainly distributed at Dailuo Terrace, Xiantong Temple, Tayuan Temple and Wuye Temple, all located in the heart of Taihuai town. The scale of the latter was wide, concentrated in “one area and seven spots” of Taihuai town. “One area” meaned the center of Taihuai town, including Xiantong Temple, Tayuan Temple, Pusa Terrace, Wuye temple, Shuxiang Temple, Dailuo Terrace, Luohou Temple and Longquan Temple specifically. “Seven spots” included five terraces, Hongmenyan and Nanshan Temple. Besides, quantities of tourist flows between Xiantong temple and Tayuan temple, Pusa Terrace and Xiantong Temple, Wuye Temple and Tayuan Temple were at the top of the list. Secondly, the size of this tourism network is 54, its density is 0.19, and degree centrality of the graph was 0.43. Thirdly, among the network nodes of tourist flows, Dailuo Terrace, Luohou Temple and West Terrace were beginning nodes. Dailuo Terrace, Xiantong Temple, Pusa Terrace, Luohou Temple, Shuxiang Temple, Tayuan Temple and Wuye Temple were core nodes. Terminal nodes include Pusa Terrace and Luoquan Temple. Dailuo Terrace, North Terrace, South Terrace and Nanshan Temple played roles of being structural holes in the tourism network. The study offered guidance for tourism planners to lay out tourist facilities, plan touring routes rationally and control tourism capacity in peak season. More important, it contributed to the shortage of studies on spatial structure of tourist flows in the perspective of small tourist destinations.

参考文献/References:

[1] 谢彦君.基础旅游学 [M]. 北京:商务印书馆,2015:248. [XIE Yanjun. Basic tourism [M]. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2015:248]
[2] WOLFEA R I. Summer cottagers in Ontario. Economic Geography [J], 1951, 27(1):10-32.
[3] HILLS T L,LUNDGREN J. The impact of tourism in the Caribbean: A methodological study [J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 1997, 4(5): 248-267.
[4] 崔粉粉.湖北省旅游资源与旅游流的空间错位研究 [D].武汉:华中师范大学,2016. [CUI Fenfen. The spatial mismatch between tourism resources and tourism flow in Hubei province [D]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University, 2016]
[5] 姚昭屹.京津冀旅游流网络结构与旅游环境耦合协调关系研究 [D]. 秦皇岛:燕山大学,2015. [YAO Zhaoyi. Coupling coordination of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei tourism flow network structure and its tourism environment [D]. Qinhuangdao: Yanshan University, 2015]
[6] 任瑞萍,吴晋峰,王奕祺,等.旅华美国旅游流地理分布和网络结构特征研究 [J]. 地域研究与开发,2013,32(5):144-150. [REN Ruiping, WU Jinfeng, WANG Yiqi, et al. Research on geographic distribution and network structure characteristics of entering-China American tourist flow [J]. Areal Research and Development, 2013, 32(5):144-150]
[7] 任瑞萍.旅华美国市场特征及拓展对策研究[D]. 西安:陕西师范大学,2013. [REN Ruiping. Research on the characteristics of entering-China American tourist market and its expansion strategy [D]. Xi'an: Shannxi Normal University, 2013]
[8] 吴必虎,唐俊雅,黄安民等.中国城市居民旅游目的地选择行为研究 [J]. 地理学报,1997,52(2):97-103. [WU Bihu, TANG Junya, HUANG Anmin. A study on destination choice behavior of Chinese urban residents [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1997, 52(2):97-103]
[9] 张宏磊.交通系统要素变动下的旅游流时空响应[D]. 南京:南京大学,2012. [ZHANG Honglei. The role of transport in spatial-temporal changes of tourist flows [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University, 2012]
[10] 涂玮,黄震方,方叶林.基于网络团购的虚拟旅游流空间差异及动力机制研究 [J]. 地域研究与开发,2013,32(4):84-89. [TU Wei, HUANG Zhenfang, FANG Yelin. Spatio-temporal difference and influence mechanism of virtual tourist flows on the basis of network group-buying [J]. Areal Research and Development, 2013, 32(4):84-89]
[11] 宋晓頔,白永平,吴玉萍.中国国家级风景名胜区旅游客流空间格局初探 [J]. 资源开发与市场,2009,25(12):1134-1136. [SONG Xiaodi, BAI Yongping, WU Yuping. Primary study on spatial pattern of Chinese national parks tourist flow [J]. Resource Development and Market, 2009, 25(12):1134-1136]
[12] 杨新军,牛栋,吴必虎.旅游行为空间模式及其评价 [J]. 经济地理,2000,20(4):105-117. [YANG Xinjun, NIU Dong, WU Bihu. Spatial models and their assessment on regional tourist behavior [J]. Economic Geography, 2000, 20(4):105-117]
[13] 王永明,马耀峰,王美霞.北京入境旅游流空间扩散特征及路径 [J]. 经济地理,2011,31(6):1019-1024. [WANG Yongming, MA Yaofeng, WANG Meixia. A study on spatial diffusion features and diffusion routes of inbound tourist flows of Beijing city [J]. Economic Geography, 2011, 31(6):1019-1024]
[14] 章锦河,张捷,李娜,等.中国国内旅游流空间场效应分析 [J]. 地理研究,2005,24(2):293-303. [ZHANG Jinhe, ZHANG Jie, LI Na, et al. An analysis on spatial field effect of domestic tourist flows in China [J]. Geographical Research, 2005, 24(2):293-303]
[15] SHIH H Y. Network characteristics of drive tourism destinations: An application of network analysis in tourism [J].Tourism Management, 2006, 27(5):1029-1039.
[16] 周慧玲,许春晓.基于游记行程的湖南旅游流空间网络结构特征 [J]. 经济地理,2016,36(10):201-206. [ZHOU Huiling, XU Chunxiao. Study on Spatial Network Structure of Hunan Tourist Flow Based on Travel Arrangement [J]. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(10):201-206]
[17] 杨兴柱,顾朝林,王群,等.城市旅游客流空间体系研究—以南京市为例 [J]. 经济地理,2011,31(5):868-873. [YANG Xingzhu, GU Chaolin, WANG Qun, et al. Spatial system of urban tourist flows: A case study of Nanjing [J]. Economic Geography, 2011, 31(5):868-873]
[18] 刘霜.中国山岳景区空间分布与形成因素评价 [D]. 上海:上海师范大学,2013. [LIU Shuang. Evaluation of spatial distribution and formation factors of Chinese mountain scenic spots [D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University, 2013]
[19] 陈金华.中国山岳型景区安全管理实证研究 [J]. 华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015(1):72-82. [CHEN Jinhua. A case study of scenic safety management on Wuyi Mountains [J]. Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences), 2015(1):72-82]
[20] 五台山风景名胜区管理委员会.五台山风景名胜区简介 [EB/OL]. http://www.sxwts.gov.cn/s/2015/jqjs_1005/313.html,2015-10-05. [Wutai Mountain Scenic Spot Management Committee. The introduction of Wutai Mountain Scenic Spot [EB/OL]. http://www.sxwts.gov.cn/s/2015/jqjs_1005/313.html, 2015-10-05]
[21] 胡传东,李露苗,罗尚焜.基于网络游记内容分析的风景道骑行体验研究—以318国道川藏线为例 [J]. 旅游学刊,2015,30(11):99-110. [HU Chuandong, LI Lumiao, LUO Shangkun. Cycling tourists' experience of scenic byways based on content analysis of travel blogs: A case study of the Sichuan-Tibet section of national highway 318 [J]. Tourism Tribune, 2015, 30(11):99-110]
[22] 张妍妍,李君轶,杨敏.基于旅游数字足迹的西安旅游流网络结构研究 [J]. 人文地理,2014(4):111-118. [ZHANG Yanyan, LI Junyi, YANG Min. The tourism flow network structure of Xi'an based on tourism digital footprint [J]. Human Geography, 2014(4):111-118]
[23] 刘法建,张捷,章锦河,等.旅游流空间数据获取的基本方法分析—国内外研究综述及比较 [J]. 旅游学刊,2012,27(6):101-109. [LIU Fajian, ZHANG Jie, ZHANG Jinhe, et al. Analysis of the basic method of collecting the spatial data of tourist flows: A study review and comparison both at home and abroad [J]. Tourism Tribune, 2012, 27(6):101-109]
[24] 李照航,郭风华,李仁杰,等.大量网络游记文本中热度地名提取方法与实证研究 [J]. 地理与地理信息科学,2015,31(1):68-73. [LI Zhaohang, GUO Fenghua, LI Renjie, et al. Method and case study of Hot-Toponym extraction from mass amount of internet travel blog text[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2015, 31(1):68-73]
[25] 刘军.整体网分析讲义 [M]. 上海:上海人民出版社,2009:19-21,54-62. [LIU Jun. Lectures on whole network approach [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai People Press, 2009: 19-21,54-62]
[26] 蔚海燕,戴泽钒,许鑫,等.上海迪士尼对上海旅游流网络的影响研究—基于驴妈妈游客数字足迹的视角 [J]. 旅游学刊,2018,33(4):33-45. [WEI Haiyan, DAI zefan, XU Xin, et al. The Impact of Shanghai Disneyland on Shanghai's tourist flow network: From the perspective of tourists' digital footprints on the Lvmama Website [J]. Tourism Tribune, 2018, 33(4):33-45]
[27] 刘军.社会网络分析导论 [M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004:112-130. [LIU Jun. An introduction to social network analysis [M]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2004:112-130]
[28] 陈浩,陆林,郑嬗婷.基于旅游流的城市群旅游地旅游空间网络结构分析—以珠江三角洲城市群为例 [J]. 地理学报,2011,66(2):257-266. [CHEN Hao, LU Lin, ZHENG Chanting. The spatial network structure of the tourism destinations in urban agglomerations based on tourist flow: A case study of the Pearl River Delta [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2011, 66(2):257-266]
[29] 徐敏,黄震方,曹芳东,等.基于在线预订数据分析的旅游流网络结构特征与影响因素—以长三角地区为例 [J]. 经济地理,2018,38(6):193-202. [XU Min, HUANG Zhenfang, CAO Fangdong, et al. The network structure features and influence factors of tourism flows based on online data analysis-Taking the Yangtze River Delta Region as an example [J]. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(6):193-202]
[30] 阮文奇,张舒宁,郑向敏.中国游客赴泰旅游流网络结构及其形成机理研究 [J]. 世界地理研究,2018,27(4):34-44. [Ruan Wenqi, ZHANG Shu'ning, ZHENG Xiangmin. A study on the network structure of Chinese tourists' traveling to Thailand and its formation mechanism [J]. World Regional Studies, 2018, 27(4):34-44]
[31] 杨小莉,冯卫红.山西省旅游流空间网络结构特征研究—基于不同出游方式的比较 [J]. 生产力研究,2017(3): 111-115. [YANG Xiaoli, FENG Weihong. Study on spatial structure characteristics of tourist flows in Shanxi Province-Based on comparison of different travel modes [J]. Productivity Research, 2017(3):111-115]

相似文献/References:

[1]张俊思,徐薇涵,袁大刚*,等.湿润季风气候条件下芒硝矿区土壤盐分空间分布特征[J].山地学报,2016,(02):157.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000113]
 ZHANG Junsi,XU Weihan,YUAN Dagang,et al.Spatial Distribution of Soil Salinity in the Mirabilite Area under the Humid Monsoon Climate Condition[J].Mountain Research,2016,(3):157.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000113]
[2]汤家法,胥忞旻,张雅茜.北川震后重建居民点存在的问题与调控对策[J].山地学报,2016,(02):242.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000124]
 TANG Jiafa,XU Minmin,ZHANG Yaxi.Some Problems and Its Adjustment Measures of Reconstructed Settlements after Earthquake in Beichuan[J].Mountain Research,2016,(3):242.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000124]
[3]麦积山,郑江坤*,赵廷宁,等.北川震后滑坡体表层土壤颗粒组成及团聚体空间变化特征[J].山地学报,2019,(01):30.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000396]
 MAI Jishan,ZHENG Jiangkun*,ZHAO Tingning,et al.Spatial Variability of Post-shock Surface Soil Aggregates and Particle Composition in the Landslide Area of Beichuan County, South-western China[J].Mountain Research,2019,(3):30.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000396]
[4]张梦旭,刘 蔚*,朱 猛,等.黑河上游山地土壤容重分布特征及影响因素[J].山地学报,2019,(02):198.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000413]
 ZHANG Mengxu,LIU Wei*,ZHU Meng,et al.Patterns and Environmental Controls of Soil Bulk Density in the Mountainous Regions of the Upper Heihe River Basin, China[J].Mountain Research,2019,(3):198.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000413]
[5]李 军,赵玉竹,邓 梅.基于DEM的山地地理可照时数空间分布估算统计模型--以重庆为例[J].山地学报,2019,(02):284.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000422]
 LI Jun,ZHAO Yuzhu,DENG Mei.The Statistical Model for Estimating Spatial Distribution of Possible Sunshine Duration Based on DEM in Mountain Area: A Case Study in Chongqing, China[J].Mountain Research,2019,(3):284.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000422]
[6]胡 震,赵翠薇*,李朝仙,等.喀斯特高原峡谷区少数民族村寨空间分布格局及影响因素研究--以贵州省威宁县为例[J].山地学报,2019,(04):575.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000449]
 HU Zhen,ZHAO Cuiwei*,LI Chaoxian,et al.Spatial Distribution Pattern and Influencing Factorsof Ethnic Villages in Karst Plateau Canyon Area:A Case Study of Weining County, Guizhou, China[J].Mountain Research,2019,(3):575.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000449]
[7]何小芊,刘 策.中国国家地质公园空间可达性分析[J].山地学报,2019,(04):602.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000451]
 HE Xiaoqian,LIU Ce.Analysis on Spatial Accessibility of China's National Geopark[J].Mountain Research,2019,(3):602.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000451]
[8]王兆峰,李 琴.长征沿线红色文化遗产空间分布特征及旅游高质量发展[J].山地学报,2022,(4):581.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000695]
 WANG Zhaofeng,LI Qin.Spatial Distribution of Red Cultural Heritage and High-Quality Tourism Development along the Long March[J].Mountain Research,2022,(3):581.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000695]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2019-01-29; 改回日期(Accepted data):2020-05-20
基金项目(Foundation item):忻州师范学院青年基金项目(QN201410)。 [Youth Foundation Project in Xinzhou Normal University(QN201410)]
作者简介(Biography):任瑞萍(1989-),女,山西河津人,硕士,讲师,主要研究方向:旅游规划与市场开发。[REN Ruiping(1989-), female, born in Hejin, Shanxi province, M.Sc., lecturer, research on tourism planning and market development]E-mail: renruiping1228@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-05-30