[1]王 强,陈田田*,李爱迪,等.“三生”视角下的国土空间利用质量评价——以攀西地区为例[J].山地学报,2020,(2):290-302.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000510]
　WANG Qiang,CHEN Tiantian*,LI Aidi,et al.Evaluation of Territorial Utilization Quality Based on “Production-Living-Ecological” Perspectives——A Case Study of Panxi Region[J].Mountain Research,2020,(2):290-302.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000510]
点击复制

“三生”视角下的国土空间利用质量评价——以攀西地区为例()
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2020年第2期
页码:
290-302
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2020-05-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Evaluation of Territorial Utilization Quality Based on “Production-Living-Ecological” Perspectives——A Case Study of Panxi Region
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2020)2-290-13
作者:
王 强1; 陈田田2; 3*; 李爱迪1; 张仕超2; 3; 王跃峰2; 3
1.重庆市规划和自然资源调查监测院,重庆 401121; 2.重庆师范大学 地理与旅游学院,重庆 401331; 3.三峡库区地表过程与环境遥感重点实验室,重庆 401331
Author(s):
WANG Qiang1;  CHEN Tiantian2; 3*;  LI Aidi1;  ZHANG Shichao2; 3;  WANG Yuefeng2; 3
1. Chongqing Institute of Surveying and Monitoring for Planning and Natural Resources, Chongqing 401121, China; 2. College of Geography and Tourism, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China; 3. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Process and Environment RemoteSensing in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Chongqing 401331, China
关键词:
三生功能;  国土空间利用质量;  协调性;  统筹发展;  攀西地区
Keywords:
Production;  living and ecological functions;  Territorial Utilization Quality;  Coordination;  Integrated development;  Panxi region
分类号:
K901
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000510
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
近年来,随着城镇化、工业化的推进,国土空间出现了用地相互侵占、生态环境破坏、粮食安全受到威胁等一系列问题,国土空间的利用效率与质量提升变得尤为重要。为实现生产空间的集约高效、生活空间的宜居适度、生态空间的山清水秀。本文基于“三生”功能的理念,以攀西地区为例,采用综合指标法对其国土空间利用质量和协调性进行评价,并针对性的提出国土空间利用质量提升的方法,研究结果显示:(1)攀西地区“三生”空间利用质量指数等级不高,生产空间的指数差异性高于生活空间,生活空间又高于生态空间;(2)攀西地区“三生”空间利用质量的整体协调性不高,多数区县处于不协调水平;(3)就经济发展而言,经济水平越高的区域其“三生”空间利用质量协调性相对较高;(4)在功能分区上,城市化地区的“三生”空间利用质量的协调性高于农产品主产区,农产品主产区又高于重点生态功能区,考虑到重点生态功能区自身发展现状和特殊性,应重点强化其“三生”空间利用能力,以实现区域统筹发展。本研究可以为区域国土空间开发以及优化提供参考。
Abstract:
In recent years, with the advancement of urbanization and industrialization, a series of territorial problems have arisen, such as mutual occupation of different land use types, serious destruction of ecological environment, threats to food security and so on, it is particularly important to improve the territorial utilization quality. To achieve intensive and efficient production space, livable living space and beautiful ecological space, this study used the comprehensive index method to construct index system, evaluate the quality and coordination of territorial utilization, and put forward ways to improve the territorial utilization quality from the perspective of production, living and ecological functions. The results showed that:(1)the grade of the index for territorial utilization quality in Panxi region was not high, and the difference of the index for territorial utilization quality in production space was greater than that of living space and the ecological space was the smallest, which reflects the imbalance of regional economic development from the side.(2)The overall coordination of territorial utilization quality in Panxi region was not high, and most districts(counties)were at an uncoordinated level, so it is urgent to improve the efficiency of territorial utilization in these districts(counties).(3)As far as economic development is concerned, the higher the economic level, the higher the coordination of territorial utilization quality, such as the west district of Panzhihua City.(4)In terms of functional zoning, the coordination of territorial utilization quality in urbanized areas was greater than that of the major agricultural production areas, and the national key ecological function zones was the lowest. So, considering its self-development situation and particularity of the national key ecological functional zones, the utilization capacity of production, living and ecological spaces should be strengthened through the development of ecology, health care and tourism industry to achieve the integrated development of Panxi region. This study can provide reference for regional territorial development and optimization.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张景鑫. 基于“三生空间”的区域国土空间利用质量及耦合协调度评价研究—以苏南城市群为例[D].南京:南京农业大学,2017.[ZHANG Jingxin. Assessment of land space utilization quality and its coupling and coordination based on the three Eco-space concept — A case study of the Southern Jiangsu Region [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2017]
[2]陈田田. 国家重点生态功能区“三生”空间优化方法研究—以普格县为例 [D]. 北京:中国科学院大学, 2019.[CHEN Tiantian. Study on the optimization method of production-living-ecological spaces in the national key ecological function zones — A case study of Puge County [D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019]
[3]孙丕苓, 许月卿, 刘庆果, 等. 环京津贫困带土地利用多功能性的县域尺度时空分异及影响因素[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(15): 283-292.[SUN Piling, XU Yueqin, LIU Qingguo, et al. An spatiotemporal differentiation and driving factors of multi-functionality of land use in county scale in poverty belt around Beijing and Tianjin [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017,33(15): 283-292]
[4] 李广东, 方创琳. 城市生态-生产-生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016,71(1): 49-65.[LI Guangdong, FANG Chuanglin. Quantitative function identification and analysis of urban ecological-production-living spaces [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016,71(1): 49-65]
[5]黄金川, 林浩曦, 漆潇潇. 面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3): 378-391.[HUANG Jinchuan, LIN Haoxi, QI Xiaoxiao. A literature review on optimization of spatial development pattern based on ecological-production-living space [J]. Progress in Geography, 2017,36(3):378-391]
[6] DE GROOT R S, WILSON M A, BOUMANS R M. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services [J]. Ecological economics, 2002, 41(3): 393-408.
[7] WIGGERING H, MüLLER K, WERNER A, et al. The concept of multifunctionality in sustainable land development [J]. In Sustainable development of multifunctional landscapes. 2003: 3-18.
[8] 陈逸, 黄贤金, 陈志刚, 等. 中国各省域建设用地开发空间均衡度评价研究[J]. 地理科学, 2012,32(12): 1424-1429. [CHEN Yi, HUANG Xianjin, CHEN Zhigang, et al. The spatial balance degree evaluation of construction land in China [J]. ScientiaGeographicaSinica, 2012,32(12): 1424-1429]
[9] 桑玉昆, 赵丹丹, 蒋金亮, 等. 基于功能用地适宜性的农业科技园区规划方案评价[J].农业工程学报, 2014,30(10): 217-224. [SANG Yukun, ZHAO Dandan, JIANG Jinliang, et al. Evaluation of agricultural science park planning based on suitability of function land [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014,30(10): 217-224]
[10] 赵亚莉, 刘友兆. 城市土地开发强度差异及影响因素研究—基于222个地级及以上城市面板数据[J]. 资源科学, 2013,35(2): 380-387. [ZHAO Yali, LIU Youzhao. Diffidence and influencing factors of urban land development intensity across 222 cities in China [J]. Resources Science, 2013,35(2): 380-387]
[11] 李秋颖, 方创琳, 王少剑. 中国省级国土空间利用质量评价:基于“三生”空间视角[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2016,35(5): 163-169.[LI Qiuying, FANG Chuanglin, WANG Shaojian. Evaluation of territorial utilization quality in China: based on the aspect of production-living-ecological space [J]. Areal research and development, 2016,35(5): 163-169]
[12] LI X B, WANG X H. Changes in agriculture land use in China: 1981-2000 [J]. Asian Geographer, 2003,22(1):27-42.
[13] 王国刚, 刘彦随, 陈秧分.中国省域耕地集约利用态势与驱动力分析[J]. 地理学报, 2014,69(7): 907-915.[WANG Guogang, LIU Yansui, CHEN Yangfen. Dynamic trends and driving forces of land-use intensification in the cultivated land of China [J]. ActaGeographicaSinica, 2014,69(7): 907-915]
[14]李秋颖. 城市群地区国土空间利用质量评价与提升路径研究—以山东半岛城市群为例[D]. 北京:中国科学院大学,2015.[LI Qiuying. Study on territory utilization quality evaluation and promotion strategy of Urban Agglomeration — take Shandong Peninsula Urban Agglomeration as an example [D]. Beijing: The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015]
[15] 龚华, 柴彦威, 刘志林.深圳市民工作日生活活动时空结构特征研究[J]. 人文地理, 2000,6(14): 64-70.[GONG Hua, CHAI Yanwei, LIU Zhilin. Analysis of the time-space structure of Shenzhen citizen's daily activity [J]. Human Geography, 2000,6(14): 64-70]
[16] 丁菡. 基于“三生”空间的国土空间开发利用分析—以浙江省为例[J]. 中国国土资源经济, 2018, 31(9):13-20+36.[DING Han. Development and utilization of land spaces in view of the spaces for production, ecological and domestic purposes — the case study of Zhejiang Province [J]. Natural Resource Economics of China, 2018, 31(9): 13-20+36]
[17] DAILY G C, SÖDERQVIST T, ANIYAR S, et al. The Value of Nature and the Nature of Value[J]. Science, 2000, 289(5478): 395-406.
[18] GROOT R D. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes [J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2006,75(3): 175-186.
[19] 傅伯杰, 吕一河, 陈利顶,等. 国际景观生态学研究新进展[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(2): 798-804. [FU Bojie, LV Yihe, CHEN Liding, et al. The latest progress of landscape ecology in the world [J]. ActaEcologicaSinica, 2008, 28(2): 798-804]
[20] 毛齐正, 罗上华, 马克明,等. 城市绿地生态评价研究进展[J]. 生态学报,2012,32(17): 5589-5600.[MAO Qizheng, LUO Shanghua, MA Keming, et al. Research advances in ecological assessment of urban greenspace [J]. ActaEcologica-Sinica, 2012,32(17): 5589-5600]
[21] 刘慧. 区域差异测度方法与评价[J]. 地理研究, 2006,25(4): 710-718.[LIU Hui. Regional inequality measurement: methods and evaluations [J]. Geographical Research, 2006,25(4): 710-718]
[22] 张景鑫. 基于“三生空间”的区域国土空间利用质量及耦合协调度评价—以苏南城市群为例[J]. 农业科学研究, 2017,38(3): 57-63. [ZHANG Jingxin. Assessment of land space utilization quality and its coupling and coordination based on producing, living and ecological — A case study of the southern Jiangsu Region [J]. Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2017, 38(3): 57-63]
[23] 唐常春, 孙威. 长江流域国土空间开发适宜性综合评价[J]. 地理学报, 2012,67(12): 1587-1598.[TANG Changchun, SUN Wei. Comprehensive evaluation of land spatial development suitability of the Yangtze River Basin [J]. ActaGeographicaSinica, 2012, 67(12): 1587-1598]
[24] 段七零. 县域尺度的国土主体功能区划研究—以江苏省海安县为例[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 2010,2(2): 18-19.[DUAN Qiling. On the subdivision of main function region of territory in county scale — a case study of Haian County in Jiangsu Province [J]. Territory & Natural resources study, 2010,2(2): 18-19]
[25] 丛明珠, 欧向军, 赵清,等. 基于主成分分析法的江苏省土地利用综合分区研究[J]. 地理研究, 2008,27(3): 574-582.[CONG Mingzhu, OU Xiangjun, ZHAO Qing, et al. Division of land use degree in Jiangsu Province based on principal component analysis [J]. Geographical Research, 2008, 27(3): 574-582] [26] 曾卫, 杨春, 周瀚韬. 地质生态环境与城市化关联性研究—以重庆市为例[J]. 山地学报, 2018,36(5):21-34.[ZENG Wei, YANG Chun, ZHOU Hantao. Associative analysis of Geo — ecological environment and urbanization: a case study of Chongqing, China [J]. Mountain Research, 2018,36(5): 21-34]
[27] 吴一洲, 吴次芳, 罗文斌. 浙江省县级单元建成区用地绩效评价及其地域差异研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010,25(2): 330-340.[WU Yizhou, WU Cifang, LUO Wenbin. Research on land use performance and its geographical difference at County level in Zhejiang [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010,25(2): 330-340]
[28] 潘竟虎, 郑凤娟. 甘肃省县域土地利用绩效的空间差异测度及其机理研究[J]. 西北师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,47(1): 87-92. [PAN Jinghu, ZHENG Fengjuan. Research on spatial difference of the county land use performance and its mechanism in Gansu Province [J]. Journal of Northwest Normal University(Natural Science), 2011,47(1): 87-92]
[29] 刘春艳, 张继飞, 赵宇鸾, 等. 基于生态位理论的国土空间功能重要性评估—以攀西地区为例[J]. 城市规划, 2018, 4(42): 90-99.[LIU Chunyan, ZHANG Jifei, ZHAO Yunuan, et al. Significance evaluation for territorial functions based on niche theory: A case study on Panxi area. Planning Studies, 2018, 4(42): 90-99]
[30] 陈勇. 四川西部山区民族聚落生态分区研究[J]. 西部发展评论, 2012.[CHEN Yong. Study on the ecological division of ethnic settlements in Western Sichuan [J]. Comments on Western Development, 2012]
[31] 汪正州. 四川可持续发展实验区主体功能区划研究[D]. 成都:四川师范大学,2013.[WANG Zhengzhou. The main functional areas division's study of Sichuan sustainable experimental zone [D]. Chengdu: Sichuan Normal University, 2013]
[32] 潘竟虎, 李俊峰. 中国A级旅游景点空间分布特征与可达性[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(1):55-66.[PAN Jinghu, LI Junfeng. Spatial distribution characteristics and accessibility of A-grade tourist attractions in China [J]. Journal of natural resources, 29(1):55-66]
[33] 戴维丽. 基于网络分析的中国城市影响范围空间界定研究[D].兰州:西北师范大学, 2016.[DAI Weili. The spatial delimitation of Urban influential hinterland in China based on network analysis [D]. Lanzhou: Northwest Normal University, 2016]
[34] 刘晓丽,班茂盛,宋吉涛,等. 城镇土地集约利用与转变增长方式综合评价研究—以北京市海淀区北部新区为例[J]. 地理科学进展,2007, 26(5): 65-76.[LIU Xiaoli, BAN Maosheng, SONG Jitao, et al. Study on Synthesis Evaluation of Intensive Land Use and Growth Pattern Transformation of Towns — A Case Study of the Nor th New Area of Haidian in Beijing. Progress in geography, 2007, 26(5): 65-76]
[35] 陈瑜琦,李秀彬. 1980 年以来中国耕地利用集约度的结构特征[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4): 468-478.[CHEN Yuqi, LI Xiubin. Structural Change of Agricultural Land Use Intensity and Its Regional Disparity in China. Actageographicasinica, 2009, 64(4): 468-478]
[36] 陈红霞. 土地集约利用背景下城市人口规模效益与经济规模效益的评价[J]. 地理研究, 2012,31(10):1887-1894.[CHEN Hongxia. Evaluation on the benefit of scale economies and population size in the context of intensive land-use. Geographical research,2012,31(10):1887-1894]
[37] 朱会义,李秀彬,辛良杰. 现阶段我国耕地利用集约度变化及其政策启示[J].自然资源学报,2007, 22(6):907-915.[ZHU Huiyi, LI Xiubin, XIN Liangjie. Intensity Change in Cultivated Land Use in China and ItsPolicy Implications. Journal of natural resources, 2007, 22(6):907-915]
[38] 谌丽,张文忠,李业锦. 大连居民的城市宜居性评价[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(10): 1022-1032.[CHEN Li, ZHANG Wenzhong, LI Yejin. Urban Residential Suitability Evaluation of Dalian's Residents. Actageographicasinica, 2008, 63(10):1022-1032]
[39] 傅伯杰. 我国生态系统研究的发展趋势与优先领域[J].地理研究, 2010, 29(3): 383-396.[FU Bojie. Trends and priority areas in ecosystem research of China.Geographical research, 2010,29(3): 383-396]
[40] Gaston K J. Global Patterns in Biodiversity [J]. Nature, 2000, 405(3): 220-227.
[41] 方创琳,马海涛,李广东,等. 城市群地区国土空间利用质量提升理论与技术方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2017.[FANG Chuanglin, MA Haitao, LI Guangdong, et al. Theory and technical method of improving the quality of land and space utilization in Urban Agglomerations [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2017]
[42] 潘晓桦. 基于“三生”空间视角的区域国土空间利用质量综合评价—以贵港市为例[D]. 南宁:广西师范学院, 2018.[PAN Xiaohua. Evaluation of territorial utilization quality based on the aspect of production-living-ecological space — a case study of Guigang City [D]. Nanning:Guangxi teachers education university, 2018]

相似文献/References:

[1]魏小芳,赵宇鸾*,薛朝浪,等.山坝分区视角下的贵州省国土空间功能协调演化特征[J].山地学报,2020,(1):105.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000495]
　WEI Xiaofang,ZHAO Yuluan*,XUE Chaolang,et al.Evolutional Characteristics of Spatial Functional Coordination in Guizhou Province from A Perspective of Mountain and Basin Zoning[J].Mountain Research,2020,(2):105.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000495]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2019-09-19; 改回日期(Accepted date):2020-03-31
基金项目(Foundation item):重庆师范大学基金项目资助(19XLB015); 国家自然科学基金项目(41971244); 重庆师范大学基金项目资助(19XLB009)。[Chongqing Normal University Funding Project(19XLB015); National Natural Science Foundation of China(41971244); Chongqing Normal University Funding Project(19XLB009)]
作者简介(Biography):王强(1986-),男,重庆涪陵人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:资源与环境遥感。[WANG Qiang(1986-), male, born in Fuling, Chongqing City, M. Sc. candidate, research on remote sensing of resources and environment] E-mail: cqwensten@163.com
*通讯作者(Corresponding author):陈田田(1989-),女,讲师,主要研究方向:土地利用变化与区域发展。[CHEN Tiantian(1989-), female, lecturer, specialized in land use change and regional development]E-mail: chentiantian@cqnu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-03-30