[1]王雷宏a,杨俊仙b,曹翠萍a*.茂兰国家自然保护区喀斯特森林系统发育结构[J].山地学报,2020,(2):201-209.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000502]
　WANG Leihonga,YANG Junxianb,CAO Cuipinga*.Phylogenetic Structure of Karst Forest in Maolan National Nature Reserve, Guizhou Province,China[J].Mountain Research,2020,(2):201-209.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000502]
点击复制

茂兰国家自然保护区喀斯特森林系统发育结构()
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2020年第2期
页码:
201-209
栏目:
山地环境
出版日期:
2020-05-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Phylogenetic Structure of Karst Forest in Maolan National Nature Reserve, Guizhou Province,China
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2020)2-201-09
作者:
王雷宏a; 杨俊仙b; 曹翠萍a*
安徽农业大学 a.林学与园林学院; b. 理学院,合肥 230036
Author(s):
WANG Leihonga;  YANG Junxianb;  CAO Cuipinga*
Anhui Agricultural University a. School of Forestry & Landscape Architecture; b. School of Science, Hefei 230036, China
关键词:
喀斯特森林;  群落构建;  系统发育结构;  地形部位;  茂兰
Keywords:
Karst forest;  community assemble;  phylogenetic structure;  topographical position;  Maolan
分类号:
Q948.1
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000502
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了揭示茂兰喀斯特森林群落构建的主导力量,检测了11个典型喀斯特群落的系统发育结构以及与生境的关系。结果表明:喀斯特森林群落的系统发育多样性与香农威纳指数、物种丰富度的变化趋势基本是一致的,各群落在物种系统进化上累积的信息相近。黄梨木(Boniodendron minus)—飞蛾槭(Acer oblongum)、荚蒾(Viburnum dilatatum)—鹅掌柴(Schefflera heptaphylla)、青冈(Cyclobalanopsis glauca)—圆果化香(Platycarya longipes)、圆果化香—黄皮(Clausena lansium)、圆果化香—荚蒾、掌叶木(Handeliodendron bodinieri)—光叶槭(Acer laevigatum)、栲(Castanopsis fargesii)—杜英(Elaeocarpus decipiens)、紫树(Nyssa sinensis)—山胡椒(Lindera glauca)林系统发育结构聚集。短叶黄杉(Pseudotsuga brevifolia)—广东松(Pinus kwangtungensis)、短叶黄杉—化香、梧桐(Firmiana simplex)—青冈林系统发育结构均匀。群落系统发育结构分布格局表现为,系统发育结构聚集的群落位于山体的漏斗、沟谷、中坡、下坡、山垭口的部位,而系统发育结构均匀的群落位于山体的上坡、山脊的部位。以地形部位上坡为界划分两种生境,学生氏t检验表明两种生境下群落的系统发育结构差异显著,说明茂兰喀斯特地区山体的地形部位是构建和维持喀斯特森林类型的主导力量。
Abstract:
The aim of study is to reveal the main driving force of Karst forest community assembly and maintenance in Maolan National Nature Reserve. The phylogenetic structures and patterns of 11 typical Karst communities were examined, and the relationship between these measures and habits for all communities was analyzed. The results showed that the basic accordance of the phylogenetic diversity(log10PD)of Karst forest community with the variation tendencies of species richness(lnS)and Shannon Wiener index(H'). The accumulated informations were similar in phylogenetic evolution of species for all communities. The communities of phylogenetic clustering were Boniodendron minus—Acer oblongum, Viburnum dilatatum—Schefflera heptaphylla, Cyclobalanopsis glauca-Platycarya longipes, Pl. longipes—Clausena lansium, Pl. longipes—Viburnum dilatatum, Handeliodendron bodinieri—Acer laevigatum, Castanopsis fargesii—Elaeocarpus decipiens, Nyssa sinensis—Lindera glauca. The communities of phylogenetic evenness or overdispersion were Pseudotsuga brevifolia—Pinus kwangtungensis, Ps. brevifolia—Pl. longipes, Firmiana simplex— C. glauca. The community phylogenetic structure patterns were that the communities in funnels, cheuchs, middle slopes, downslopes, and mountain passes were phylogenetic clustering. The communities on upslopes and ridges were phylogenetic evenness or overdispersion. All habitats were divided into two habitat types by the upslope of terrain. The differences of community phylogenetic structure among communities on these two habitats were significant by Student's t test, that suggested that the topographical position of a mountain in Karst areas in Maolan was a main force for assemble and maintenance various karst forest types dominantly.

参考文献/References:

[1] 刘映良,薛建辉. 贵州茂兰退化喀斯特森林数量分类[J]. 贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版,2005,29(3):23-27. [LIU Yingliang, XUE Jianhui. Quantitative properties of degraded Karst forest communities in Maolan mountain area of Guizhou[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science s Edition), 2005, 29(3): 23-27]
[2] 李援越,朱守谦,祝小科. 黔中退化喀斯特森林植物群落的数量分类[J]. 山地农业生物学报,2000, 19(2): 97-98. [LI Yuanyue, ZHU Shouqian, ZHU Xiaoke. Number classification of degraded Karst forests in the central Guizhou[J].Journal of Mountain Agriculture and Biology, 2000, 19(2):97-98]
[3] 张建利,吴华,喩理飞,等. 草海湿地流域典型喀斯特森林群落α、β多样性分析[G]//第十五届中国科协年会第19分会场:中国西部生态林业和民生林业与科技创新学术研讨会论文集. 中国科学技术协会学会学术部,2013:7. [ZHANG Jianli, WU Hua, YU Lifei, et al. α、βdiversity analysis of typical karst forest communities in Caohai Wetland River basin[G]// The 19th branch venue of the 15th annual meeting of China association for science and technology. Proceedings of the symposium on scientific and technological innovation and ecological forestry and people's livelihood forestry in western China. Academic department of Chinese association for science and technology, 2013:7]
[4] 魏鲁明, 朱守谦, 李援越. 茂兰喀斯特森林数量分类学初步研究[G]//朱守谦. 喀斯特森林生态研究(Ⅰ). 贵阳:贵州科技出版社,1993: 22-50. [WEI Luming, ZHU Shouqian, LI Yuanyue. Preliminary study on numberical classification of Maolan Karst foreset[G]. ZHU Shouqian. Ecological research on karst forest(Ⅰ). Guiyan: Guizhou Publishing House of Science and Technology, 1993: 22-50]
[5] ROSINDELL J, HUBBELL S, ETIENNE R. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography at Age Ten[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2011, 26:340-348.
[6] 黄建雄,郑凤英,米湘成. 不同尺度上环境因子对常绿阔叶林群落的谱系结构的影响[J]. 植物生态学报,2010, 34(3): 309-315.[HUANG Jianxiong, ZHENG Fengying, MI Xiangcheng. Influence of environmental factors on phylogenetic structure at multiple spatial scales in an evergreen broad-leaved forest of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(3):309-315]
[7] WEBB C O, ACKERLY D D, MCPEEK M A. et al. Phylogenies and community ecology[J]. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 2002, 33: 475-505.
[8] SWENSON N G, ENQUIST B J, PITHER J, et al. The problem and promise of scale dependency in community phylogenetics[J]. Ecology, 2006, 87(10): 2418-2424.
[9] SWENSON N G, ENQUIST B J, THOMPSON J, et al. The influence of spatial and size scale on phylogenetic relatedness in tropical forest communities[J]. Ecology, 2007, 88(7): 1770-1780.
[10] KEMBEL S W, HUBBELL S P. The phylogenetic structure of a neotropical forest tree community[J]. Ecology, 2006, 87(7Suppl):86-99.
[11] SWENSON N G, ENQUIST B J, THOMPSON J, et al. The influence of spatial and size scale on phylogenetic relatedness in tropical forest communities[J]. Ecology, 2007, 88(7):1770-1780.
[12] LETCHER S G. Phylogenetic structure of angiosperm communities during tropical forest Succession[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2010, 277(1678): 97-104.
[13] 龙翠玲. 茂兰喀斯特森林林隙植被恢复的物种组成及生活型特征[J]. 云南植物研究, 2007, 29(2):201-206. [LONG Cuiling. Species composition and life form feature of vegetation restoration in gaps of Karst forest in Maolan Nature Reserve, Guizhou Province[J]. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 2007, 29(2): 201-206]
[14] 牛红玉,王峥峰,练琚愉, 等. 群落构建研究的新进展: 进化和生态相结合的群落谱系结构研究[J]. 生物多样性,2013, 19(3): 275-283. [NIU Hongyu,WANG Zhengfeng, LIAN Juyu, et al. New progress in community assembly: community phylogenetic structure combining evolution and ecology[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2013, 19(3): 275-283]
[15] ZANNE A E, TANK D C, CORNWELL W K, et al. Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments[J]. Nature, 2014, 506: 89-92.
[16] SMITH S A, BROWN J W. Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2018, 105: 302-314.
[17] JIN Yi, QIAN Hong. V. PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants[J]. Ecography, 2019, 42: 1353-1359.
[18] KEMBEL S W, COWAN P D, HELMUS M R, et al. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology[J]. Bioinformatics, 2010, 26:1463-1464.
[19] KEMBEL S W, CAHILL Jr J F. Independent evolution of leaf and root traits within and among temperate grassland plant communities[J]. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6(6): e19992.
[20] GRAHAM A. The age and diversification of terrestrial New World ecosystems through Cretaceous and Cenozoic time[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2011, 98(3): 336-351.
[21] CONDAMINE F L, SPERLING F A H, WAHLBERG N, et al. What causes latitudinal gradients in species diversity? Evolutionary processes and ecological constraints on swallowtail biodiversity[J]. Ecology Letters, 2012, 15(3):267-277.
[22] GRAHAM C H, PARRA J L, RAHBEK C, et al. Phylogenetic structure in tropical hummingbird communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences[M]. USA, 2009, 106:19673-19678.
[23] QIAN H, ZHANG J, SANDEL B, et al. Phylogenetic structure of angiosperm trees in local forest communities along latitudinal and elevational gradients in Eastern North America[J]. Ecography, 2019:1-12. DOI: 10.1111/ecog.04873.

相似文献/References:

[1]龙翠玲,余世孝.茂兰喀斯特森林林隙树种更新及其与环境的相关性分析[J].山地学报,2007,(06):684.
[2]龙翠玲.茂兰喀斯特森林林隙物种多样性的动态规律[J].山地学报,2009,(03):278.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2019-7-24; 改回日期(Accepted date): 2020-4-15
基金项目(Foundation item):国家林木种质资源共享服务平台(2005DKA21003); 国家林业和草原局生物安全与遗传资源管理(KJZXSA2018007); 安徽省教育厅高校自然科学研究项目(KJ2017A815)。[ National Forest Genetic Resources Shared Service Platform(2005DKA21003); National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Biosafety and Genetic Resources Management(KJZXSA2018007); Natural Science Foundation of Higher Education Institutions of Education Department of Anhui Province(KJ2017A815)]
作者简介(Biography):王雷宏(1977-),男,副教授,主要研究方向:树木学与森林群落生态学。[WANG Leihong(1977-), male, associate professor, research on dendrology and forest community ecology] E-mail: wangleihong208010@126.com
*通讯作者(Corresponding author):曹翠萍,女,教授,主要研究方向:林木遗传育种[CAO Cuiping, female, professor, research on forest genetics and tree breeding] E-mail: cuipingcao@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-03-30