[1]戴文远a,b,c,等.基于生态安全格局的山地河谷地区建设用地空间管制研究--以福建省沙溪重点开发区为例[J].山地学报,2019,(05):747-757.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000465]
　DAI Wenyuana,b,c,et al.Study on Spatial Control of Construction Land in Mountain and Valley Areas Based on Ecological Security Pattern: A Case Study of Shaxi Key Development Area, Fujian Province, China[J].Mountain Research,2019,(05):747-757.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000465]
点击复制

基于生态安全格局的山地河谷地区建设用地空间管制研究--以福建省沙溪重点开发区为例()
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2019年05期
页码:
747-757
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2019-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on Spatial Control of Construction Land in Mountain and Valley Areas Based on Ecological Security Pattern: A Case Study of Shaxi Key Development Area, Fujian Province, China
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2019)5-747-11
作者:
戴文远a; b; c; 江方奇a; b; 黄万里a; b; c; 廖李红a; b
福建师范大学 a.地理科学学院; b.地理研究所; c.湿润亚热带山地生态国家重点实验室培育基地,福州350007
Author(s):
DAI Wenyuana; b; c;  JIANG Fangqia; b;  HUANG Wanlia; b; c;  LIAO Lihonga; b
a. School of Geographical Sciences, b. Institute of Geography,c.State Key Laboratory for Subtropical Mountain Ecology of the Ministry of Science and Technology and Fujian Province, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China
关键词:
空间管制分区;  生态安全格局;  山地河谷;  沙溪重点开发区
Keywords:
space partition;  ecological security pattern;  mountain and valley;  Shaxi Key Development Area
分类号:
F301.2~A
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000465
摘要:
构建山地河谷地区的生态安全格局对协调生态脆弱区的人地关系,指导建设用地空间管制,推动山区经济社会可持续发展具有重要意义。本文以福建省沙溪重点开发区为例,基于1992年、2000年和2015年三期土地利用数据,分析建设用地变化特点,并通过识别地质灾害防护、乡土文化遗产保护、生物保护和洪水防范等四类生态源地,应用MCR构建区域综合生态安全格局,结合DEM开展建设用地空间管制分区研究。结果表明:23 a间研究区居住用地和工矿用地持续增长,特别是工矿用地增长速度高达264.63%,但受河谷地形制约,建设用地扩张的集聚性极强,主要集中在沙溪干流5 km的缓冲区内,区域人口、资源与环境的矛盾日益突出; 研究区综合生态安全格局以中、高安全格局区域为主,分别占研究区总面积的42.43%和41.47%,而低安全格局面积仅占16.10%,生态安全格局与其重点开发区的主体功能定位基本吻合; 基于综合生态安全格局和山地河谷地形特点,提出建设用地空间管制分区方案,其中禁止建设区面积1354.66 km2,占38.94%; 限制建设区面积最大,为1408.70 km2,占40.49%; 作为建设用地后备资源的允许建设区受地形制约显著,面积504.10 km2,占14.49%,且分布离建成区较远。研究结果将为主体功能区的国土空间规划、土地资源利用与生态环境协调发展提供科学依据与参考。
Abstract:
Ecological security pattern construction in mountain and valley areas is significant for harmonizing the human-land relationship in ecological fragile areas, providing guidance for spatial control of construction land as well as promoting sustainable development of economies and society in mountain areas. Taking Shaxi Key Development Area as a case study area, the paper studied features of change on construction land, constructed regional comprehensive ecological security pattern with MCR by identifying four types of ecological sources, namely geological disaster precautions, rural cultural heritages protection, biological protection and flood control as well as space partition on construction land based on DEM, according to the data of land use in the years of 1992, 2000 and 2015. Results showed that: Use of residential and industrial land in the study area continued to grow in the past 23 years, especially the latter, with a growth rate of 264.63%. With the limitation of valley landform, increasing use of construction land developed a tendency of clustering, 5 kms along the main stream of Shaxi River within the buffer zone, which underlined the regional conflicts among population, resources and environment gradually. The areas of moderate and high levels ecological land dominated the comprehensive ecological security pattern in the study area, accounting for 42.43% and 41.47%,respectively, while the area of low level ecological land accounted for 16.10%. Therefore, the ecological security pattern matched with the functional positioning of the key development area. Under the features of the valley landform, the project of space partition for construction land is proposed according to the comprehensive ecological security pattern. The area of prohibited construction land covered 1354.66 km2, accounting for 38.94% of the study area while the area of restricted construction land, as the biggest part, covered 1408.70 km2,accounting for 40.49%. Limited by landform, the area of permitted construction land, being as the reserved resource, covered 504.10 km2, accounting for 14.49%, which was far away from the built-up area. The research provides scientific basis and reference for the land use planning, use of land resources and harmonious development of ecological environment in the main functional area.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈吉煜,刘勇,何东.山地城市的蔓延特征分析--以重庆主城区为例[J].山地学报, 2018,36(3):432-440. [CHEN Jiyu, LIU Yong, HE Dong. Characteristics of urban sprawl in mountainous cities: a case of central Chongqing [J]. Mountain Research, 2018, 36(3): 432-440]
[2] 罗瑾,刘勇,岳文泽,等.山地城市空间结构演变特征:从沿河谷扩展到多中心组团式扩展[J].经济地理,2013,33(2):61-67. [LUO Jin, LIU Yong, YUE Wenze, et al. Evolution of urban spatial structure in mountainous cities: transforming from linear expansion along valley to polycentric urban development [J]. Economic Geography, 2013, 33(2):61-67]
[3] 彭建,郭小楠,胡熠娜,等.基于地质灾害敏感性的山地生态安全格局构建--以云南省玉溪市为例[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(2):627-635. [PENG Jian, GUO Xiaonan, HU Yina, et al.Constructing ecological security patterns in mountain areas based on geological disaster sensitivity: a case study in Yuxi city, Yunnan province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2017,28(2):627-635]
[4] 丛佃敏, 赵书河,于涛,等. 综合生态安全格局构建与城市扩张模拟的城市增长边界划定--以天水市规划区(2015-2030年)为例[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(1):14-26. [CONG Dianmin, ZHAO Shuhe, YU Tao, et al. Urban growth boundary delimitation method integrating comprehensive ecological security pattern and urban expansion simulation: a case study of planning areas in Tianshui City(2015-2030)[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(1):14-26]
[5] STEFFEN W, RICHARDSON K, ROCKSTROM J, et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet [J]. Science, 2015, 347(6223):736-747.
[6] WU Jianguo. Urban ecology and sustainability: the state-of-the-science and future directions [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 125(2): 209-221.
[7] YU Kongjian. Security patterns and surface model in landscape ecological planning [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1996, 36(1):1-17.
[8] YU Kongjian. Landscape ecological security patterns in biological conservation [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(1):8-15.
[9] 俞孔坚,黄刚,李迪华,等. 景观网络的构建与组织--石花洞风景名胜区景观生态规划探讨[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2005(3):80-85. [YU KongJian, HUAN Gang, LI Dihua, et al. Construction and organization of the landscape networks: discussion on the landscape ecological planning of the Beijing Shihua cave scenic area [J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2005(3):80-85]
[10] 游巍斌,何东进,洪伟,等. 基于景观安全格局的武夷山风景名胜区旅游干扰敏感区判识与保护[J]. 山地学报, 2014, 32(2):195-204. [YOU Weibin, HE Dongjin, HONG Wei, et al. Identification for tourism disturbance sensitive areas and their protection based on landscape security pattern in world mixed heritage site Wuyishan scenery district[J]. Mountain Research, 2014, 32(2):195-204]
[11] 郭明,肖笃宁,李新,等. 黑河流域酒泉绿洲景观生态安全格局分析[J].生态学报, 2006,26(2): 457-466. [GUO Ming, XIAO Duning, LI Xin, et al. Changes of landscape pattern between 1986 and 2000 in Jiuquan oasis, Heihe river basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(2):457-466]
[12] 李晖,易娜,姚文璟,等. 基于景观安全格局的香格里拉县生态用地规划[J].生态学报,2011, 31(20): 5928-5936. [LI Hui, YI Nan, YAO Wenjin, et al. Shangri-La county ecological land use planning based on landscape security pattern[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2011,31(20):5928-5936]
[13] 陈利顶, 吕一河,田惠颖,等. 重大工程建设中生态安全格局构建基本原则和方法[J]. 应用生态学报,2007,18(3):674-680. [CHEN Liding, LU Yihe, TIAN Huiying, et al. Principles and methodology for ecological rehabilitation and security pattern design in key project construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007,18(3):674-680]
[14] 温小乐,林征峰, 唐菲. 新兴海岛型城市建设引发的生态变化的遥感分析--以福建平潭综合实验区为例[J].应用生态学报, 2015, 26(2):541-547. [WEN Xiaole, LIN Zhengfeng, TANG Fei. Remote sensing analysis of ecological change caused by construction of the new island city: Pingtan comprehensive experimental zone, Fujian province [J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(2):541-547]
[15] 俞孔坚,王思思,李迪华,等. 北京市生态安全格局及城市增长预景[J].生态学报, 2009, 29(3):1189-1204. [YU Kongjian, WANG Sisi, LI Dihua, et al. The Function of Ecological security patterns as an urban growth frame work in Beijing [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(3):1189-1204]
[16] 龚建周,夏北成,陈健飞,等. 基于3S 技术的广州市生态安全景观格局分析[J].生态学报, 2008,28(9):4323-4333. [GONG Jianzhou, XIA Beicheng, CHEN Jianfei, et al. Dynamic analysis of the Guangzhou landscape eco-security pattern based on 3S technology[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(9):4323-4333]
[17] 王思易, 欧名豪. 基于景观安全格局的建设用地管制分区[J].生态学报,2013,33(14):4425-4435. [WANG Siyi,OU Minghao. Zoning for regulating of construction land based on landscape security pattern[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013,33(14):4425-4435]
[18] 左晓英,王洪新,门明新,等. 基于景观安全格局的曹妃甸新区城镇扩张研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2014, 45(2):297-302. [ZUO Xiaoying, WANG Hongxin, MEN Mingxin, et al. Urban expansion planning of Caofeidian new district based on the landscape security pattern [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2014, 45(2): 297-302]
[19] 吴琳娜,杨胜天,刘晓燕,等.1976年以来北洛河流域土地利用变化对人类活动程度的响应[J].地理学报,2014,69(1):54-63. [WU Linna, YANG Shengtian, LIU Xiaoyan, et al. Response analysis of land use change to the degree of human activities in Beiluo River basin since 1976[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(1):54-63]
[20] 刘纪远,匡文慧,张增祥,等. 20世纪80年代末以来中国土地利用变化的基本特征与空间格局[J].地理学报,2014,69(1):3-14. [LIU Jiyuan, KUANG Wenhui, ZHANG Zengxiang, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns and causes of land use changes in China since the late 1980s[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(1):3-14]
[21] 黎晓亚,马克明,傅伯杰,等.区域生态安全格局:设计原则与方法[J].生态学报, 2004, 24(5):1055-1062. [LI Xiaoya, MA Kemin, FU Bojie, et al. The regional pattern for ecological security(RPES): designing principles and method [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(5):1055-1062]
[22] 谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报, 2003,18(2):189-196. [XIE Gaodi, LU Chunxia, LENG Yunfa, et al. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003, 18(2):189-196]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2019-02-01; 改回日期(Accepted date):2019-08-31
基金项目(Foundation item):福建省科技厅公益类重点项目(2017R1034-2); 福建省自然科学基金项目(2018J01741)。[Key Public Welfare Project of Fujian Science and Technology Department(2017R1034-2); Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province(2018J01741)]
作者简介(Biography):戴文远(1972- ),男,福建莆田人,副教授,主要从事土地利用与城乡可持续发展研究。[DAI Wenyuan(1972-), male, born in Putian, Fujian province, associate professor, research on land use and urban and rural sustainable development] E-mail: dwygeo@fjnu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-30