[1]李旭华,刘 涛,蔡 蕾,等.川西云杉人工林立地类型划分与质量评价——以岷江上游杂谷脑流域为例[J].山地学报,2024,(6):751-764.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000859]
　LI Xuhua,LIU Tao,CAI Lei,et al.Classification of Site Type and Quality Evaluation for Artificial Forest of Picea Asperata in Western Sichuan: A Case Study of the Zagunao Basin in the Upper Reach of the Miniiang River, China[J].Mountain Research,2024,(6):751-764.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000859]
点击复制

川西云杉人工林立地类型划分与质量评价——以岷江上游杂谷脑流域为例
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2024年第6期
页码:
751-764
栏目:
山地环境
出版日期:
2024-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Classification of Site Type and Quality Evaluation for Artificial Forest of Picea Asperata in Western Sichuan: A Case Study of the Zagunao Basin in the Upper Reach of the Miniiang River, China
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2024)6-751-14
作者:
李旭华; 刘 涛; 蔡 蕾; 徐峥静茹; 刘兴良; 冯秋红*
(四川省林业科学研究院 a. 森林和湿地生态恢复与保育四川省重点实验室,成都 610081; b. 四川大熊猫国家公园定位观测研究站,四川 阿坝藏族羌族自治州 623006; c. 卧龙森林生态四川省野外科学观测研究站,四川 阿坝藏族羌族自治州 623006)
Author(s):
LI Xuhua;  LIU Tao;  CAI Lei;  XU Zhengjingru;  LIU Xingliang;  FENG Qiuhong*
(a. Ecological Restoration and Conservation for Forest and Wetland Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, SAF, Chengdu 610081, China; b. Sichuan Giant Panda National Park Observation and Research Station, SAF, Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture 623006, Sichuan, China; c. Wolong Forest Ecology Observation and Research Station of Sichuan Province, SAF, Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture 623006, Sichuan Academy of Forestry Sciences(SAF), Sichuan, China)
关键词:
云杉人工林;  立地类型划分;  立地质量评价;  数量化理论Ⅰ
Keywords:
spruce plantation;  site classification;  site quality evaluation;  quantification theory type I
分类号:
S718.5
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000859
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
森林立地类型的合理划分和立地质量的精准评价是实现森林质量精准提升的重要前提,也是促进森林管理精细化的基础。然而当前研究在立地类型划分与质量评价研究方面存在区域性标准不一、评价体系不完善等问题,亟需结合区域特征开展进一步探索。本文以云杉人工林为研究对象,应用主成分分析、数量化理论Ⅰ等方法开展云杉人工林立地类型划分与质量评价。研究结果表明:(1)土层厚度、海拔和坡向为影响云杉人工林生长的主导因子; 不同立地因子的组合将云杉人工林生长环境划分为2个立地类型组、18个立地类型。其中,岷江上游杂谷脑流域内现有云杉人工林的立地类型共有13类,主要分布于阳坡半阳坡的中土层(41～80 cm)高海拔(3200～4200 m)地区。(2)杂谷脑流域云杉人工林的立地质量以“良”和“中”两个等级为主,二者占比达93%。优质立地主要位于阳坡或半阳坡的薄土层(≤40 cm)中海拔(2400～3200 m)区域。(3)总体而言,云杉人工林立地质量普遍处于中等及以上水平,林地生产力仍具有提升潜力。对于Ⅱ级林地,应以培育水源涵养林为主,兼顾森林碳汇功能; 对于Ⅲ级林地则应以培育水土保持林为主。本研究可为川西山地云杉人工林的健康经营与质量提升提供依据和技术支持。
Abstract:
A proper classification of forest site types and objective evaluation of the quality of the sites are prerequisites for achieving targeted improvement of forest quality and are also the basis for refining forest management. However, there were severely disputes over forest site classification and quality evaluation, mostly because of inconsistent regional standards and incomplete evaluation frameworks, necessitating further exploration these issues in concert with regional geo-enviornment features.
In this study, it took artificial forest of spruce(Picea asperata)in the Zagunao basin in the upper reach of the Miniiang River, western Sichuan, China as research target. Several methods such as principal component analysis(PCA)and Quantification Theory I were used to complete the investigation.
(1)Soil layer thickness, elevation, and slope aspect were major site determinants of spruce plantation growth. In combination with different site factors, spruce plantation could be divided into two major site type groups and 18 distinct site types. In the Zagunao basin, there existed 13 site types of spruce plantations, which primarily distributed on sunny or semi-sunny slopes with moderately deep soils(41-80 cm)at high elevations(3200-4200 m).
(2)The forest site qualities of spruce plantations in the Zagunao basin were predominantly rated as good or moderate grades, accounting for 93% of the total. High-quality sites were primarily found in mid-elevation(2400-3200 m)zones with shallow soils(≤40 cm)on sunny or semi-sunny slopes.
(3)Overall, the site qualities of spruce plantations were generally at a medium or above level, indicating considerable potential for improvement on forest productivity. For Class II sites, concerted efforts should be made on cultivating water conservation forests while also considering forest carbon sequestration functions. For Class III sites, emphasis should be placed on the development of soil and water conservation forests.
This study provides a scientific foundation and technical support for the sustainable management and quality improvement of spruce plantations in the mountainous regions of western Sichuan, China.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈祥伟, 胡海波. 林学概论[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2005: 182. [CHEN Xiangwei, HU Haibo. Forestry panorama [M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2005: 182]
[2] 袁雪丽, 汪阳东, 黄兴召, 等. 基于数量化理论对山苍子立地类型划分及评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2020, 35(5): 91-96. [YUAN Xueli, WANG Yangdong, HUANG Xingzhao, et al. Classification and evaluation of Litsea cubeba site types based on quantification theory [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2020, 35(5): 91-96] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2020.05.14
[3] 申琳琳, 邓海燕, 林洪, 等. 江西赣州桉树人工林立地类型划分及评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2022, 42(5): 33-43. [SHEN Linlin, DENG Haiyan, LIN Hong, et al. Site classification and evaluation of Eucalyptus plantations in Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2022, 42(5): 33-43] DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2022.05.004
[4] 张宴恺. 东北东部山地樟子松立地类型划分及立地质量评价[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2022: 1-33. [ZHANG Yankai. Site classification and site quality evaluation of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica Litv. in eastern mountain area of northeast China [D]. Haerbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2022: 1-33]
[5] 李仁平. 辽东山区油松建筑材林立地类型划分及立地质量评价[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2018: 1-62. [LI Renping. Classification of forest sites and evaluation of building timber forests dominated by Pinus tabulaeforims in Liaodong mountain areas [D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2018: 1-62]
[6] 闫烨琛. 大清河流域山丘区立地类型划分与评价[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2020: 1-99. [YAN Huachen. Classification and evaluation of site types in hilly areas of Daqing river basin [D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2020: 1-99] DOI: 10.26949/d.cnki.gblyu.2020.001029
[7] 汤维, 黄朗, 杨浩, 等. 基于平均优势木胸径的湖南杉木人工林立地质量评价模型[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2024, 44(5): 26-34. [TANG Wei, HUANG Lang, YANG Hao, et al. Site quality evaluation model of Chinese fir plantation in Hunan based on the DBH of average dominant trees [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2024, 44(5): 26-34] DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2024.05.003
[8] 段光爽, 郑亚丽, 洪亮, 等. 基于潜在生产力的华北落叶松纯林和白桦山杨混交林立地质量评价[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(10): 1-9. [DUAN Guangshuang, ZHENG Yali, HONG Liang, et al. A potential productivity-based approach of site quality evaluation for larch pure forest and birch-aspen mixed forest [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(10): 1-9] DOI: 10.11707/j. 1001-7488.20221001
[9] 陈涛, 王露露, 王思崇, 等. 河南省丘陵低山区刺槐人工林立地分类及立地质量评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2023, 38(1): 153-159. [CHEN Tao, WANG Lulu, WANG Sichong, et al. Site classification and quality evaluation of Robinia pseudoacacia plantation in hilly and low mountainous areas in Henan [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2023, 38(1): 153-159] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2023.01.21
[10] 李艳洁. 将乐林场杉木人工林立地类型划分与立地质量评价[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2017: 1-45. [LI Yanjie. Site classification and site quality evaluation of Chinese fir plantation in Jiangle stated-owned forestry [D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2017: 1-45]
[11] 张晓文, 于青军, 罗桂生, 等. 平泉油松建筑材林立地类型划分及立地质量评价[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(9): 1-12. [ZHANG Xiaowen, YU Qingjun, LUO Guisheng, et al. Site classification and site quality evaluation of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation for construction timber in Pingquan, Hebei Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(9): 1-12] DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210901
[12] 张春霞, 冯自茂, 李文鑫, 等. 陕西黄陵油松人工林立地类型划分及评价[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(1): 55-63. [ZHANG Chunxia, FENG Zimao, LI Wenxin, et al. Site classification and evaluation of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation in Huangling, Shaanxi [J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 49(1): 55-63] DOI: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2021.01.007
[13] 刘平, 于磊, 李仁平, 等. 辽东山区油松建筑材林立地质量评价研究[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2019, 50(1): 70-77. [LIU Ping, YU Lei, LI Renping, et al. Site quality evaluation of Pinus tabulaeformis building timber forest in the mountainous area of eastern Liaoning Province, China [J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2019, 50(1): 70-77] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1700.2019.01.009
[14] 唐诚, 王春胜, 庞圣江, 等. 广西大青山西南桦人工林立地类型划分及评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2018, 33(4): 52-57. [TANG Cheng, WANG Chunsheng, PANG Shengjiang, et al. Site classification and evaluation of Betula alnoides plantations at Guangxi Daqing mountain [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2018, 33(4): 52-57] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2018.04.08
[15] 庞宏东, 李玲, 杨代贵, 等. 南方丘陵山地泡桐人工林立地类型划分与质量评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2022, 42(8): 40-47. [PANG Hongdong, LI Ling, YANG Daigui, et al. Site classification and quality evaluation of Paulownia plantation in the hilly area of south China [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2022, 42(8): 40-47] DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2022.08.004
[16] 杨文, 陈立新, 段文标, 等. 红松人工林立地质量评价及生长收获效益[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2024, 44(6): 102-111. [YANG Wen, CHEN Lixin, DUAN Wenbiao, et al. Site quality evaluation and growth harvest benefit of Pinus koraiensis plantation [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2024, 44(6): 102-111] DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2024.06.010
[17] 李旭华, 徐峥静茹, 蔡蕾, 等. 不同抚育措施对川西亚高山云杉人工林土壤微生物群落结构的短期影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2023, 29(3): 663-669. [LI Xuhua, XU Zhengjingru, CAI Lei, et al. Short-term effects of different tending measures on soil microbial communities in subalpine spruce plantations of western Sichuan [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental, 2023, 29(3): 663-669] DOI: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2022.03007
[18] 冯秋红, 黄劲松, 徐峥静茹, 等. 密度调控对川西亚高山云杉人工林生物量和生物多样性的影响[J]. 四川林业科技, 2016, 37(3): 10-14. [FENG Qiuhong, HUANG Jinsong, XU Zhengjingru, et al. Effects of density adjusting on biomass and biodiversity of artificial Picea asperata forest in sub-alpine region of western Sichuan, China [J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2016, 37(3): 10-14] DOI: 10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2016.03.002
[19] 冯秋红, 吴晓龙, 徐峥静茹, 等. 密度调控对川西山地云杉人工林地被物及土壤水文特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(1): 98-104. [FENG Qiuhong, WU Xiaolong, XU Zhengjingru, et al. Effects of density adjustment on ground cover and soil hydrological function of Picea asperata plantation in the subalpine region of western Sichuan Province, China [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2018, 42(1): 98-104] DOI: 10.3969/j. issn.1000-2006.201601020
[20] 徐亚莉, 张明芳, 李强, 等. 基于植被和环境因子的亚高山森林土壤水源涵养功能空间尺度上推模型构建——以岷江上游杂谷脑流域为例[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(13): 5614-5626. [XU Yali, ZHANG Mingfang, LI Qiang, et al. Upscaling subalpine forest soil water-holding capacity based on vegetation and environmental factors: An example of the Zagunao River watershed in the upper reach of the Minjiang River in China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(13): 5614-5626] DOI: 10.5846/ stxb202206071611
[21] 马明东, 刘跃建. 应用4种数学方法对暗针叶云杉林分生境属性的研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2006, 14(1): 196-201. [MA Mingdong, LIU Yuejian. Analysis on the environmental property of Picea asperata stand through four mathematical methods [J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2006, 14(1): 196-201]
[22] 张沛健, 卢万鸿, 徐建民, 等. 雷琼地区尾细桉人工林立地类型划分及其质量评价[J]. 林业科学研究, 2021, 34(6): 130-139. [ZHANG Peijian, LU Wanhong, XU Jianmin, et al. Site classification and quality evaluation of Eucalyptus urophylla × E. tereticornis plantation in Hainan Island and Leizhou peninsula region [J]. Forest Research, 2021, 34(6): 130-139] DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2021.06.016
[23] 隆孝雄. 四川立地分区及适生树种[J]. 四川林业科技, 2001, 22(4): 54-58. [LONG Xiaoxiong. Site classification and suitable tree species in Sichuan Province [J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2001, 22(4): 54-58] DOI: 10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2001.04.008
[24] 李正茂, 李昌珠, 张良波, 等. 油料树种光皮树人工林立地质量评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2010, 30(3): 75-79. [LI Zhengmao, LI Changzhu, ZHANG Liangbo, et al. Evaluation of Cornus wilsoniana plantation site quality [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2010, 30(3): 75-79] DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2010.03.013
[25] 李秉钧, 蔡宗明, 刘聘, 等. 福建省福建柏人工林立地类型划分及质量评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2023, 38(5): 86-92. [LI Bingjun, CAI Zongming, LIU Pin, et al. Site classification and evaluation of Fokienia hodginsii plantation in Fujian Province [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2023, 38(5): 86-92] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2023.05.12
[26] 李贤伟, 李守剑, 张健, 等. 四川盆周西缘水杉人工林林地立地质量评价研究[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2002, 20(2): 106-109. [LI Xianwei, LI Shoujian, ZHANG Jian, et al. Study on site quality evaluation of Metasequoia glyptostroboides in the west of Sichuan basin [J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2002, 20(2): 106-109] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2650.2002.02.010
[27] 黄国胜, 马炜, 王雪军, 等. 基于一类清查数据的福建省立地质量评价技术[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2014, 36(3): 1-8. [HUANG Guosheng, MA Wei, WANG Xuejun, et al. Forestland site quality evaluation of Fujian Province based on continuous forest inventory data [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(3): 1-8] DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki. jbfu.2014.03.001
[28] 陆海飞, 刘望舒, 徐建民, 等. 广西中南部尾巨桉人工林立地类型划分及立地质量评价[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(5): 13-24. [LU Haifei, LIU Wangshu, XU Jianmin, et al. Site classification and quality evaluation of Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis plantation in the south Central Guangxi, China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(5): 13-24] DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210502
[29] SHARMA R P, BRUNNER A, EID T. Site index prediction from site and climate variables for Norway spruce and Scots pine in Norway [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2012, 27(7): 619-636. DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2012.685749
[30] ALBERT M, SCHMIDT M. Climate-sensitive modelling of site productivity relationships for Norway spruce(Picea abies(L.)Karst.)and common beech(Fagus sylvatica L.)[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010, 259(4): 739-749. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.04.039
[31] AERTSEN W, KINT V, VAN ORSHOVEN J, et al. Evaluation of modelling techniques for forest site productivity prediction in contrasting ecoregions using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis(SMAA)[J]. Environmental Modelling and Software, 2011, 26(7): 929-937. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.01.003
[32] 段劼, 马履一, 贾黎明, 等. 抚育间伐对侧柏人工林及林下植被生长的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(6): 1431-1441. [DUAN Jie, MA Lyuyi, JIA Liming, et al. Effect of thinning on Platycladus orientalis plantation and the diversity of undergrowth vegetation [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(6): 1431-1441]
[33] 武朋辉, 白高平, 党坤良, 等. 抚育间伐对秦岭南坡油松中龄林生长的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(1): 20-26. [WU Penghui, BAI Gaoping, DANG Kunliang, et al. Thinning effects on growth of Pinus tabulaeformis middle-age forest on southern slope of Qinling Mountains [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017, 37(1): 20-26] DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.01.004
[34] 李青辉. 山西油松人工林立地分类及立地质量评价[D]. 太谷: 山西农业大学, 2022: 1-37. [LI Qinghui. Site classification and site quality evaluation of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation in Shanxi [D]. Taigu: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2022: 1-37] DOI: 10.27285/d.cnki.gsxnu.2022.000084
[35] 刘军, 张春华, 楚立明, 等. 红皮云杉人工林立地分类与经营方向选择[J]. 林业科技, 2000, 25(2): 19-20. [LIU Jun, ZHANG Chunhua, CHU Liming, et al. The classification of site conditions and selection of management directions for Picea koraiensis plantations [J]. Forestry Science and Technology, 2000, 25(2): 19-20] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9499.2000.02.009

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2024- 08-13; 改回日期(Accepted date):2024-12-17
基金项目(Foundation item): 四川省省财政专项项目(2021CZZX04); 四川省林草科技创新团队项目(2023LCTD0108,2024LCTD0103)。[Special Financial Project of Sichuan Province(2021CZZX04); Sichuan Provincial Forestry and Grassland Sciences Technological Innovation Team Project(2023LCTDO108, 2024LCTD0103)]
作者简介(Biography): 李旭华(1988-),女,山西晋城人,博士,副研究员,主要研究方向:亚高山森林生态。[LI Xuhua(1988-), female, born in Jincheng, Shanxi Province, Ph.D., associate professor of engineer, research on subalpine forest ecology] E-mail:xhli2011@126.com
*通讯作者(Corresponding author): 冯秋红(1982-),女,博士,研究员,主要研究方向:亚高山森林生态。[FENG Qiuhong(1982-), female, Ph.D., professor of engineer, research on subalpine forest ecology] E-mail:fqiuhhong@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-11-30