[1]王 浩,李立华*,雷若然.川藏线自行车骑乘者感知获益概念模型研究——基于AQAL理论视角[J].山地学报,2021,(3):378-388.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000604]
　WANG Hao,LI Lihua*,LEI Ruoran.Perceived Benefits of Cycling to the Sichuan-Tibet Line, China: A Conceptual Model Based on AQAL Theory[J].Mountain Research,2021,(3):378-388.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000604]
点击复制

川藏线自行车骑乘者感知获益概念模型研究——基于AQAL理论视角()
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2021年第3期
页码:
378-388
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2021-05-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Perceived Benefits of Cycling to the Sichuan-Tibet Line, China: A Conceptual Model Based on AQAL Theory
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2021)3-378-11
作者:
王 浩1; 2; 李立华1*; 雷若然1; 2
1.中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所 山区发展研究中心,成都 610041; 2.中国科学院大学,北京100049
Author(s):
WANG Hao1; 2;  LI Lihua1*;  LEI Ruoran1; 2
1.Research Center for Mountain Development, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China; 2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
关键词:
感知获益;  概念模型;  整合理论;  骑乘者;  川藏线
Keywords:
perceived benefits;  conceptual model;  integral theory;  cyclists;  Sichuan-Tibet line
分类号:
F590
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000604
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
川藏线自行车骑乘是一项艰辛耗时的旅行活动,近年来却始终为广大骑乘者所热衷,骑乘者的动机、体验在既有研究中多有探讨,但骑乘者深层次的获益感知仍缺乏系统剖析。为探析骑乘者的感知获益特征与规律,文中基于AQAL模型四象限框架,利用爬虫程序采集47篇318川藏线自行车骑乘网络游记,结合扎根理论和文本分析方法对骑乘者感知获益展开概念模型构建、感知元素提炼与维度关系评价。结果发现:(1)骑乘者感知获益概念模型包含身体获益、心理获益、文化获益和社会获益4个维度及13个子范畴;(2)骑乘者感知获益元素共聚类为4类,“坚持”“骑友”“信仰”“身体”是骑乘者感知印象最为深刻的4大元素,元素与维度呈现一体两面关系;(3)感知获益以个人化、内生性、四元共生性为典型特征,且无论是内在/外在视角还是个体/群体视角下,心理感知获益均较突出,“感受”与4大元素两两共线后构成稳定的“钻石”状语义网络结构。研究初步界定了骑乘者感知获益概念,提取出身体获益和文化获益两个新的非物质感知维度,可对旅游感知研究提供思路启示和可能创见。
Abstract:
Cycling on the Sichuan-Tibet line is an arduous and time-consuming travel activity. Nonetheless, it has always been a passion for many cyclists in recent years. The motivation and experience of cyclists have been discussed in existing studies, but there is still a lack of systematic analysis of cyclists' deep-rooted perceived benefits of cycling. Therefore, in this study, we explored the perceptions of cyclists intending to or have already cycled on the Sichuan-Tibet line. Based on the four-quadrant framework of the AQAL model, we collected 47 travel blogs of cyclists by a crawler program written in PHP and analyzed them using grounded theory and text analysis methods to construct a conceptual model, identify the perceptual elements, and differentiate the dimensional relationship of cyclists' perceived benefits of cycling. The results show that:(1)Four dimensions were obtained, that were, physical benefits, psychological benefits, cultural benefits, and social benefits, which were subdivided into 13 categories and reflected the complexity of cyclists' perceptions.(2)In the minds of cyclists, elements of cyclists' perceived benefits are clustered into 4 categories. Elements and dimensions showed the relationship between two sides of the same coin, and among all keywords, “persistence” “cycling-teammate” “belief” and “body” were the most common, which were also representative of four benefits that riders had perceived before embarking on the vacation.(3)Perceived benefits presented the structural characteristics of personalization, endogeneity, and symbiosis. Moreover, regardless of the internal/external perspective or the individual/group perspective, psychological benefits were more prominent. In addition, “feeling” and the aforementioned four major perceived benefits were collinear, which played the role of building up a stable semantic network, like a “diamond.” Thus, the concept of cyclists' perceived benefits was preliminarily defined and two new non-material perception dimensions of psychological benefits and cultural benefits were extracted in this research, which could be of great significance for the construction of a theoretical foundation for understanding cyclists'thinking path and other possible insights in the research of tourists' perceptions.

参考文献/References:

[1] 胡传东,李露苗,罗尚焜. 基于网络游记内容分析的风景道骑行体验研究——以318国道川藏线为例[J]. 旅游学刊,2015,30(11):99-110. [HU Chuandong, LI Lumiao, LUO Shangkun. Cycling tourists' experience of scenic byways based on content analysis of travel blogs: A case study of the Sichuan-Tibet section of national highway 318 [J]. Tourism Tribune, 2015,30(11):99-110] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2015.11.014
[2] 石飞,刘峰贵,李春花,等. 基于旅游安全的川藏公路沿线自然灾害危险性分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(7):121-126. [SHI Fei, LIU Fenggui, LI Chunhua, et al. Analysis of the natural disaster harm along the Sichuan-Tibet highway based on travel security [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2014,28(7):121-126] DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2014.07.013
[3] 苗凤祥. 自由的出走——自行车爱好者骑行西藏行为研究[J]. 长春理工大学学报(社会科学版),2011,24(1):35-37. [MIAO Fengxiang. Pilgrimage on wheels: The research about bicycle enthusiasts riding to Tibet [J]. Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition), 2011,24(1):35-37]
[4] 王汝辉,潘笑宇,李雪霖,等. 城市近郊自行车旅游对骑行者的影响研究——以成都龙泉山为例[J]. 四川师范大学学报(社会科学版),2016,43(4):74-79. [WANG Ruhui, PAN Xiaoyu, LI Xuelin, et al. The influence of suburban bicycle tourism on the rider: With Longquan Mountain in Chengdu as an example [J]. Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition), 2016,43(4):74-79] DOI: 10.13734/j.cnki.1000-5315.2016.04.010
[5] 邓冰,陈玲玲,张翾. 国外自行车旅游研究综述[J]. 旅游学刊,2015,30(3):116-126.[DENG Bing, CHEN Lingling, ZHANG Xuan. A literature review on overseas bicycle tourism research [J]. Tourism Tribune, 2015,30(3):116-126] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2015.03.012
[6] 王学基,孙九霞,黄秀波. 中介、身体与情感:川藏公路旅行中的流动性体验[J]. 地理科学,2019,39(11):1780-1786. [WANG Xueji, SUN Jiuxia, HUANG Xiubo. Mediation, body and emotion:Mobility experiences in road travel on Sichuan-Tibet Highway [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019,39(11):1780-1786] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.11.012
[7] 王华,马志新. 川藏线骑行者旅游动机与主观幸福感关系研究——旅游满意度的中介作用[J]. 旅游科学,2020,34(6):53-65. [WANG Hua, MA Zhixin. A study on tourist motivation of cycling tourism on the Sichuan-Tibet line and its impact on the cyclers' happiness: The mediating effect of tourist satisfaction [J]. Tourism Science, 2020,34(6):53-65]DOI: 10.16323/j.cnki.lykx.2020.06.005
[8] 王浩,李立华,卓曼他,等. 川藏线自行车骑乘者的价值追寻研究——基于“手段-目的链”模型[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(3):202-208. [WANG Hao, LI Lihua, MANTA Zhuo, et al. Psychological values of cycling to the Sichuan-Tibet line: A hierarchical analysis based on Means-end Chain Model [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2021,35(3):202-208] DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2021.090
[9] 王汝辉,马志新. 客观本真与存在本真的互动:川藏线骑行旅游研究[J]. 四川师范大学学报(社会科学版),2020,47(6):64-73. [WANG Ruhui, MA Zhixin. Interaction between objective authenticity and existential authenticity: On cycling tour along Sichuan-Tibet line [J]. Journal of Sichuan Normal university(Social Sciences Edition), 2020,47(6):64-73] DOI: 10.13734/j.cnki.1000-5315.2020.06.008
[10] KIL N, HOLLAND S M, STEIN T V, et al. Place attachment as a mediator of the relationship between nature-based recreation benefits and future visit intentions [J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2012,20(4):603-626. DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2011.610508
[11] HAN H, HWANG J. Multi-dimensions of the perceived benefits in a medical hotel and their roles in international travelers' decision-making process [J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2013,35:100-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.05.011
[12] 郭安禧,张一飞,郭英之,等. 旅游者感知价值维度对重游意向的影响机制——基于团队旅游者的视角[J]. 世界地理研究,2019,28(1):197-207. [GUO Anxi, ZHANG Yifei, GUO Yingzhi, et al. The influence mechanism of tourists' perceived value dimensions on revisit intention: Based on the perspective of team tourists [J]. World Regional Studies, 2019,28(1):197-207] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2017278
[13] 程绍文,张捷,徐菲菲,等. 自然旅游地社区居民旅游发展期望与旅游影响感知对其旅游态度的影响——对中国九寨沟和英国NF国家公园的比较研究[J]. 地理研究,2010,29(12):2179-2188. [CHENG Shaowen, ZHANG Jie, XU Feifei, et al. Effect of residents' tourism development expectation and tourism impacts perception on their attitude towards tourism in natural tourist destination: A comparative study between China's Jiuzhaigou and the UK's New Forest National Parks [J]. Geographical Research, 2010,29(12):2179-2188] DOI: 10.11821/yj2010120007
[14] 张安民. 特色小镇旅游获益感知对居民参与的影响——基于政治信任的调节效应[J]. 湖北农业科学,2019,58(13):184-189. [ZHANG Anmin. Impact of tourism benefit perception on residents participation in characteristic town: Moderating effect of political trust [J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2019,58(13):184-189] DOI: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2019.13.040
[15] 徐卓,彭凯平. 全观视野和自我超越——整合心理学理论和实践综述[J]. 心理咨询理论与实践,2020,2(6):325-341.[XU Zhuo, PENG Kaiping. Integral horizon & personal transcendence: The conceptual framework and clinical/life practice of integral psychology [J]. Psychological Counseling Theory and Practice, 2020,2(6):325-341] DOI: 10.35534/tppc.0206025
[16] 肯·威尔伯. 万物简史[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:121-122.[WILBER K. A brief history of everything [M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2006: 121-122]
[17] 肯·威尔伯. 整合心理学——人类意识进化全景图[M]. 合肥:安徽文艺出版社, 2015:76-78. [WILBER K. Integral psychology: Panorama of the evolution of human consciousness [M]. Hefei: Anhui Literature and Art Publishing House, 2015:76-78 ]
[18] 肯·威尔伯. 性、生态、灵性[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009:14-19.[WILBER K. Sex, ecology, spirituality [M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2009:14-19]
[19] 肯·威尔伯. 全观的视野:肯·威尔伯整合方法指导[M]. 北京:同心出版社,2013:262-295.[WILBER K. The integral vision: Ken Wilber's integrated method guide [M]. Beijing: Tongxin Publishing House, 2013:262-295]
[20] ESBJÖRN-HARGEN S. An overview of integral theory: An all-inclusive framework for the 21st century [G]//ESBJÖRN-HARGEN S. Integral theory in action. New York: Sunny Press, 2010: 33-61.
[21] 肯·威尔伯. 生活就像练习:肯·威尔伯整合实践之道[M]. 北京:同心出版社,2013:82-92. [WILBER K. Integral life practice: Ken Wilber's integrated practice [M]. Beijing: Tongxin Publishing House, 2013:82-92]
[22] 刘超,胡梦晴,林文敏,等. 山岳型景区旅游形象感知研究:基于2014-2016年黄山网络游记分析[J]. 山地学报,2017,35(4):566-571. [LIU Chao, HU Mengqing, LIN Wenmin, et al. Tourism destination image perception of mountain resorts: A comprehensive survey of the Huangshan web travel notes for 2014-2016 [J]. Mountain Research, 2017,35(4): 566-571] DOI: 10.16089 /j.cnki.1008-2786.000254
[23] 何月美,邹永广,莫耀柒. 中国游客赴马来西亚的安全感知研究——基于网络文本分析[J]. 世界地理研究,2019,28(6):200-210. [HE Yuemei, ZOU Yongguang, MO Yaoqi. Safety perception of Chinese outbound tourists in Malaysia: Based on web text analysis [J]. World Regional Studies, 2019,28(6):200-210] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2019.06.2018213
[24] 蔡礼彬,罗威. 基于扎根理论与文本分析的海洋旅游目的地意象研究——以夏威夷为例[J]. 世界地理研究,2019,28(4):201-210. [CAI Libin, LUO Wei. Study on image of marine tourism destination based on grounded theory and text analysis: A case of Hawaii [J]. World Regional Studies, 2019,28(4):201-210] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2019.04.2018120
[25] 靳代平,王新新,姚鹏. 品牌粉丝因何而狂热?——基于内部人视角的扎根研究[J]. 管理世界,2016(9):102-119. [JIN Daiping, WANG Xinxin, Yao Peng. Why are brand fans so enthusiastic? —a rooted research based on the perspective of insiders [J]. Management World, 2016(9):102-119] DOI: 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2016.09.009
[26] 金帅岐,李贺,沈旺,等. 用户健康信息搜寻行为的影响因素研究——基于社会认知理论三元交互模型[J]. 情报科学,2020,38(6):53-61+75. [JIN Shuaiqi, LI He, SHEN Wang, et al. Influencing factors of user health information search behavior: Based on ternary interaction model of social cognitive theory [J]. Information Science, 2020,38(6):53-61+75] DOI: 10.13833/j.issn.1007-7634.2020.06.008
[27] 黄杰,马继,谢霞,等. 旅游者体验价值感知的维度判别与模型研究——基于新疆游客网络文本的内容分析[J]. 消费经济,2017,33(2):85-91. [HUANG Jie, MA Ji, XIE Xia, et al. The dimensions discrimination and model study of tourists' experience value perception [J]. Consumer Economics, 2017,33(2):85-91]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2021-01-11; 改回日期(Accepted date):2021-05-17
基金项目(Foundation item):国家自然科学基金(41071091)。[National Natural Science Foundation of China(41071091)]
作者简介(Biography):王浩(1994-),男,湖北襄阳人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:山地旅游与山区发展。[WANG Hao(1994-),male, born in Xiangyang, Hubei province, M. Sc. candidate, research on mountain tourism and mountain development] E-mail:Whaoucas@163.com
*通讯作者(Corresponding author):李立华(1964-),男,湖北应城人,博士,教授,主要研究方向:山地旅游与山区发展。[LI Lihua(1954-),male, born in Yingcheng, Hubei province, Ph.D., professor, research on mountain tourism and mountain development] E-mail:Lilh@imde.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-05-30