[1]穆振北,游巍斌*,张秀芳,等.中国世界遗产空间格局及其交通可及性分析[J].山地学报,2020,(3):436-448.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000523]
　MU Zhenbei,YOU Weibin*,ZHANG Xiufang,et al.Spatial Patterns and Transportation Accessibility Analysis of World Heritages in China[J].Mountain Research,2020,(3):436-448.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000523]
点击复制

中国世界遗产空间格局及其交通可及性分析()
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2020年第3期
页码:
436-448
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2020-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Spatial Patterns and Transportation Accessibility Analysis of World Heritages in China
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2020)3-436-13
作者:
穆振北1; 游巍斌1*; 张秀芳1; 林美娇1; 何东进1; 2
1.福建农林大学 林学院,福州350002; 2.福建农林大学 金山学院,福州350002
Author(s):
MU Zhenbei1;  YOU Weibin1*;  ZHANG Xiufang1;  LIN Meijiao1;  HE Dongjin1; 2
1. College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002,China; 2. College of Jinshan, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
关键词:
世界遗产;  空间分析;  空间句法;  中国自然保护地;  GIS
Keywords:
world heritage sites;  spatial analysis;  spatial syntax;  Natural Protected Areas System in China;  GIS
分类号:
P942
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000523
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
世界遗产是具有突出意义和普遍价值的文化和自然资源,其区域空间分布格局与交通可及性对遗产资源的综合规划和系统保护具有重要意义。本文以中国已申遗成功的53处(截止2018年12月)各类世界遗产为研究对象,采用探索性空间分析和空间句法等方法分析中国世界遗产的空间分布特征及其交通可及性。结果表明:(1)在空间格局上,世界遗产分布特征总体上呈带状、组团状,各类型世界遗产集聚区域差异明显。承载优越古代文明要素的文化遗产(包括双重遗产)集中于中东部地区; 而以独特自然环境和地形地貌为优势的自然遗产集中分布在西南地区;(2)华中、华东、华北地区连接遗产资源的各类路网(高铁、普铁、国道和高速公路)的集成度和控制值2个指标明显优于西北和西南地区。北京、上海、武汉和西安等区域中心城市的路网控制值和连接值最优。长三角和珠三角地区的空运水运能力最为突出。路网结构密切影响着世界遗产的交通可及性;(3)文化遗产和双重遗产的交通通达指数较高,主要位于交通通达性指数等级的第一、二等级; 而自然遗产的交通通达指数较低,主要属于第三等级;(4)山区地形和经济发展水平一定程度制约了我国遗产资源的交通可及性,并造成区域发展之间的不平衡; 未来世界遗产申报管理中应该充分关注各遗产类型区域发展的不平衡性,并将其纳入当前国家尺度上的中国自然保护地体系建设规划与综合保护之中。
Abstract:
World heritages are cultural and natural resources with remarkable values. The spatial distribution pattern and accessibility are essential for comprehensive planning and systematic protection of these heritages. Based on the 53 world heritage sites registered until December, 2018 in China, we analyzed the spatial distribution and accessibility of these sites using Exploratory Spatial Analysis and Space Syntax. The results showed that:(1)On the spatial pattern, the distribution of world heritage sites were banded or clustered with significant differences regionally. Cultural heritage and mixed heritage sites possessed superior ancient civilization elements, which concentrated in the central and eastern China. While in comparison, natural heritage sites were unique in their topographies and mainly distribute in the southwest of China.(2)The integration and control value indicators of road networks(high-speed railway, general railway, national highway and expressway )access to China's heritage sites were high in Central, Northern and Eastern China, while it was much lower in the northwest and southwest China. On this basis, Beijing, Shanghai, Wuhan, Xi'an and other regional central cities had the most prominent traffic accessibility. The Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta had the most outstanding air and water transport capacity. In general, the structure of road network in each region had a close impact on the traffic accessibility of the local world heritage.(3)Cultural and mixed heritage sites distributed in the top two accessibility levels(high accessibility), while natural heritage sites located in the third level of accessibility(low accessibility).(4)The complex topography and retarded economic development reduced the accessibility to these heritage resources, leading to the imbalance development in different regions. We advocated to shorten the regional development gaps between heritage sites, which should also be incorporated into the planning and comprehensive protection of the Natural Protected Areas System construction in China.

参考文献/References:

[1] 董仲奎. 面向文物的地理信息系统的建立[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2004. [DONG Zhongkui. Establishment the geographic information system faced to the cultural relic[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2004]
[2] 潘运伟,杨明,刘海龙. 濒危世界遗产威胁因素分析与中国世界遗产保护对策[J]. 人文地理, 2014, 29(1):26-34+65. [PAN Yunwei, YANG Ming,LIU Hailong. A study on threat factors of world heritages in danger and protection countermeasure of world heritages in China[J]. Human Geogaphy, 2014, 29(1): 26-34+65]
[3] 李代超,王英杰,崔璟,等.《中国世界遗产图集》的设计与编制[J]. 测绘科学,2018,43(7):156-163. [LI Daichao, WANG Yingjie, CUI Jing, et al. The design and compling of the Atlas of Chinese World Heritage[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2018, 43(7): 156-163]
[4] 王伟,刘方正,张德顺.中国世界自然遗产地生物多样性保护管理现状与研究方向[J].中国园林,2019,35(9):58-61.[WANG Wei,LIU Fangzheng,ZHANG Deshun.Biodiversity conservation and management of World Natural Heritage Sites in China: Status and Research Issues[J].Chinese Landscape Architecture,2019,35(9):58-61]
[5] 游巍斌,俞建安,陈炳容,等. 世界双遗产地武夷山风景名胜区居民旅游感知分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2015,31(6):844-852. [YOU Weibin,YV Jianan,CHEN Bingrong,et al. Local people's perceptions of tourist exploitation of Wuyishan Scenery District,a mixed heritage site[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2015,31(6):844-852]
[6] 唐承财. 中国遗产地旅游景气指数测评及提升模式[J]. 资源科学,2013,35(12):2344-2351. [TANG Chengcai. Evaluation of the Tourism Prosperity Index and its promotion for Heritage Sites in China[J]. Resources Science,2013,35(12):2344-2351]
[7] Hughes, M., T. Jones, I. Phau.Community Perceptions of a World Heritage Nomination Process: The Ningaloo Coast Region of Western Australia[J]. Coastal Management, 2016,44(2): 139-155.
[8] 王昕,韦杰,胡传东. 中国世界遗产的空间分布特征[J]. 地理研究,2010,29(11):2080-2088. [WANG Xin,WEI Jie,HU Chuandong. The spatial distribution of World Heritages in China[J]. Geographical Research,2010,29(11):2080-2088]
[9] 余正军,田祥利,陈娅玲. 我国世界遗产特征分析及空间分布原因分析[J]. 自然资源学报,2015,30(10):1762-1773. [YV Zhengjun,TIAN Xiangli,CHEN Yaling. Analysis of Characteristics and Cause of Spatial Distribution of the World Heritage in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2015,30(10):1762-1773]
[10] 王昭国,杨兆萍,韩芳,等. 中国世界遗产安全格局的时空演变及威胁因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理,2015,38(4):833-842. [WANG Zhaoguo,YANG Zhaoping,HAN Fang,et al. Spatial-temporal evolution of the security pattern of world natural heritage and the threats in China[J].Arid Land Geography,2015,38(4):833-842]
[11] 张生瑞,钟林生,周睿,等. 云南红河哈尼梯田世界遗产区生态旅游监测研究[J]. 地理研究,2017,36(5):887-898. [ZHANG Shengrui,ZHONG Linsheng,ZHOU Rui,et al. Ecotourism monitoring in the Yunnan Honghe Hani Rice Terraces Heritage Property[J]. Geographical Research,2017,36(5):887-898]
[12] 张凯烊,孟晓晨. “被高铁”现象的理性分析——以京沪高铁为例[J]. 地理科学进展,2016,35(4):496-504. [ZHANG Kaiyang,MENG Xiaochen. “Involuntary high-speed railway travel”:A case study based on the Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railway[J]. Progress in Geography,2016,35(4):496-504]
[13] 李如生. 中国世界遗产保护的现状、问题与对策[J]. 城市规划,2011,35(5):38-44. [LI Rusheng. Current state,problems and countermeasures of the world heritage protection in China[J]. City Planning Review,2011,35(5):38-44]
[14] 庄鸿飞,陈君帜,史建忠,等.大熊猫国家公园四川片区自然保护地空间关系对大熊猫分布的影响[J].生态学报,40(7):2347-2359. [ZHUANG Hongfei,CHEN Junzhi,SHI Jianzhong,et al.Impacts of spatial relationship among protected areas on the distribution of giant panda in Sichan areas of giant panda national park[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,40(7):2347-2359]
[15] 张忠训,杨庆媛,王立,等. 少数民族地区传统村落交通可达性分析——以贵州省铜仁市为例[J]. 资源科学,2018,40(11):2296-2306. [ZHANG Zhongxun,YANG Qingyuan,WANG Li. Traffic accessibility analysis of traditional villages in minority areas:a case study of Tongren City,Guizhou Province[J]. Resources Science,2018,40(11):2296-2306]
[16] 卢松,张小军,张业臣. 徽州传统村落的时空分布及其影响因素[J]. 地理科学,2018,38(10):1690-1698. [LU Song,ZHANG Xiaojun,ZHANG Yechen. Spatial-temporal distribution and controlling factors of traditional villages in Huizhou Region[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2018,38(10):1690-1698]
[17] 张忠训,杨庆媛,王立,等.基于空间句法的山区旅游型小城镇多尺度空间演变——以镇远古镇为例[J].山地学报,2019,37(4):551-563.[ZHANG Zhongxun,YANG Qingyuan,WANG Li. Exploring the multi-scale spatial evolution of tourist towns in mountainous areas by spatial syntax method:a case study of Zhenyuan Ancient Town,China [J].Mountain Research,2019,37(4):551-563]
[18] 刘承良,余瑞林,段德忠. 基于空间句法的武汉城市圈城乡道路网通达性演化分析[J]. 地理科学,2015,35(6):698-707. [LIU Chengliang,YV Ruilin,DUAN Dezhong. The evolution of spatial accessibility of urban-rural road network based on the space syntax in Wuhan Metropolitan Area[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2015,35(6):698-707]
[19] 吴志军,田逢军. 基于空间句法的城市游憩空间形态特征分析——以南昌市主城区为例[J]. 经济地理,2012,32(6):156-161. [WU Zhijun,TIAN Fengjun. The analysis of urban recreational space shape characteristic and influencing factors based on space syntax—Taking Nanchang as an example[J]. Economic Geography,2012,32(6):156-161]
[20] 刘承良,许佳琪,郭庆宾. 基于铁路网的中国主要城市中心性的空间格局[J]. 经济地理,2019,39(3):57-66. [LIU Chengliang,XU Jiaqi,GUO Qingbin. Spatial pattern of urban centrality on railway hub in China's mainland[J]. Economic Geography,2019,39(3):57-66]
[21] 彭陈.我国内河航运发展现状与提升对策研究[J].当代教育实践与教学研究,2017,5(3):247+255.[PENG Chen.Research on the development status and promoting countermeasures of China's inland navigation[J].Contemporary Education Research and Teaching Practice,2017,5(3):247+255]
[22] 葛志伟. 中美内河航运的比较研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2006.[GE Zhiwei.Comparative research on Sino-American inland waterway transportation[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology,2006]
[23] Cominelli F, Greffe X. Intangible cultural heritage: Safeguarding for creativity[J]. City, Culture and Society, 2012, 3(4):245-250.
[24] 苏勤,钱树伟. 世界遗产地旅游者地方感影响关系及机理分析——以苏州古典园林为例[J]. 地理学报,2012,67(8):1137-1148. [SU Qin,QIAN Shuwei. Influence relationship and mechanism of tourists' sense of place in World Heritage Sites:a case study of the Classical Gardens of Suzhou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2012,67(8):1137-1148]
[25] 游巍斌,何东进,洪伟,等. 基于条件价值法的武夷山风景名胜区遗产资源非使用价值评估[J]. 资源科学,2014,36(9):1880-1888. [YOU Weibin,HE Dongjin,HONG Wei,et al. The non-use value of heritage resources in Wuyishan Scenery District using the contingent valuation method[J]. Resources Science,2014,36(9):1880-1888]
[26] 徐红罡,吴悦芳,彭丽娟. 古村落旅游地游线固化的路径依赖——世界遗产西递、宏村实证分析[J]. 地理研究,2010,29(7):1324-1334. [XU Honggang,WU Yuefang,PENG Lijuan. Path dependence in travel route formation in ancient village tourism destinations:An empirical study of Xidi and Hongcun[J]. Geographical Research,2010,29(7):1324-1334]
[27] 张鹏骞,周彩贤,白加德,等.自然保护地与世界遗产关系初步思考[J].自然与文化遗产研究,2020,5(1):34-40. [ZHANG Pengqian,ZHOU Caixian,BAI Jiade,et al.Preliminary study on the relationship between protected area and world heritage site[J].Study on Natural and Cultural Heritage,2020,5(1):34-40]
[28] 蔚东英,冯嫒霞,李振鹏. 中国世界自然遗产现状分析及未来申报方向研究[J]. 中国园林,2015,31(3):63-67. [WEI Dongying, FENG Yuanxia,LI Zhenpeng. The research on the present situation and the future application directions of World Natural Heritage in China[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture,2015,31(3):63-67]

相似文献/References:

[1]陈富斌,赵永涛.特种遗产资源研究基本问题——中国世界遗产与国家公园研究形势与任务[J].山地学报,2004,(01):1.
[2]钟业喜,冯兴华,宋 丽,等.赣南山地丘陵区城市人口增长与建成区扩张耦合关系[J].山地学报,2016,(04):485.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000154]
　ZHONG Yexi,FENG Xinghua,SONG Li,et al.Coupling of Urban Land Expansion and Population Growth in Mountain and Hilly Region of Southern Jiangxi[J].Mountain Research,2016,(3):485.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000154]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2019-07-25; 改回日期(Accepted date): 2020-05-07
基金项目(Foundation item):国家自然科学基金资助项目( 41301203); 福建农林大学林学高峰学科建设项目( 712018007)。[National Natural Science Foundation of China(41301203); the Forestry Academic Summit Discipline Construction Project of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University(712018007)]
作者简介(Biography):穆振北(1995-),男,河北沧州人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:自然资源管理。[MU Zhenbei(1995- ), male, born in Cangzhou, Hebei province, M.Sc.candidate, research on natural resource management]Email:17731993739@163.com
*通讯作者(Corresponding author):游巍斌(1984-),男,福建南平人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向:景观地理学与自然资源学。[YOU Weibin(1984-), male, born in Nanping, Fujian province, Ph.D., associate professor, research on landscape geography and natural resources]E-mail:weibinyou@fafu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-05-30