[1]苏 艺,邓 伟*,张继飞,等.尼泊尔中部山区麦拉姆齐流域农户生计资本与生计策略关系研究[J].山地学报,2016,(05):645-653.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000173]
　SU Yi,DENG Wei*,ZHANG Jifei,et al.Relationship between Livelihood Capital and Livelihood Strategies of Rural Households in Melamchi Basin of Central Mountainous Area in Nepal[J].Mountain Research,2016,(05):645-653.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000173]
点击复制

尼泊尔中部山区麦拉姆齐流域农户生计资本与生计策略关系研究()
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2016年05期
页码:
645-653
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2016-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Relationship between Livelihood Capital and Livelihood Strategies of Rural Households in Melamchi Basin of Central Mountainous Area in Nepal
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2016)5-645-09
作者:
苏 艺1; 2; 邓 伟1; 2*; 张继飞1; Hriday Lal Koirala3;  Paudel Khatiwada Shanta1; 2
1. 中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所/山区发展研究中心,四川 成都 610041;
2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049;
3. 特里布文大学中心地理系, 加德满都8212,尼泊尔
Author(s):
SU Yi1; 2;  DENG Wei1; 2*;  ZHANG Jifei1;  Hriday Lal Koirala3;  Paudel Khatiwada Shanta1; 2
1.Mountain Development Research Center,Institute of Mountain Hazard and Environment, Chinese Academy of Science, Chengdu 610041, China;
2.University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China;
3.Central Department of Geography,Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu 8212, Nepal
关键词:
生计资本;  生计策略;  敏感性;  山区;  尼泊尔
Keywords:
livelihood capital;  livelihood strategies;  sensitivity;  mountainous areas;  Nepal
分类号:
F301; K901
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000173
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
生计资本与生计策略关系的研究是理解和发展农村可持续生计最重要的途径。本文以尼泊尔中部山区麦拉姆齐流域为例,采用PRA法进行实地调研,定量分析了该流域农户的生计资本状况,生计资本对生计策略的影响及不同生计策略对生计资本因子的敏感性特征。研究表明:(1)农户生计资本指数低,各类资本差异明显,且资本的转化能力弱。物质资本得分最高,其次为人力资本、社会资本、金融资本,自然资本最低。(2)以非农为主型生计策略农户的资本总指数最高,生计策略也相对最优; 非农型资本总指数次之,但生计风险相对较高; 农为主型资本总指数低于前二者,但生计脆弱性相对较低; 纯农型资本总指数最低,生计策略组合单一,生计风险相对最高。(3)生计资本及其组合差异是影响农户生计策略选择的重要原因,改善生计资本的配置能够推动农户生计策略的调整和优化。不同生计策略对资本因子的敏感性亦有所差异,提高人力资本和金融资本的投入,对于尼泊尔山区农户积极参与和发展非农生计活动,合理调整和优化生计策略,减小生计风险具有重要意义。
Abstract:
The study on relationship between livelihood capital and livelihood strategy is the most important way to understand and develop sustainable livelihoods in rural areas. However, very little is known about the influence of livelihood capitals on the livelihood strategies in Nepal. Therefore, by taking a mountainous settlement in Melamchi Basin of central Nepal as case study, this paper analyzes the sensitivity of livelihood strategies to livelihood capital factors in the rural household by the PRA method. The results indicate a very low livelihood capital index for all the sampled households with the highest physical capital index followed by human capital, social capital, financial capital, and the natural capital. And all kinds of livelihood capital are highly imbalance with very weak conversion ability. The results also show that the non-farming-dependent household's livelihood capital index is the highest, and its livelihood strategy is also best. The non-agricultural and agricultural-dependent households' livelihood capital indexes are the second and third highest while pure-agricultural households' livelihood capital index is the lowest whose livelihood depends only on the single source with high livelihood risk. Further the study finds the different level of livelihood capital endowments and their combination affect the choice of households' livelihood strategies. Improving the allocation of livelihood capital can promote the adjustment and optimization of livelihood of rural households. Different livelihood strategies have different sensitivity to the capital factors, more specifically, increasing the investment of human capital and financial capital is of great significance for households to actively participate in and develop non-agricultural activities, adjust and optimize the livelihood strategies, and reduce livelihood risk.

参考文献/References:

[1] DFID. Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets [M]. London:DFID Working Paper,2007:55-83
[2] Stewart Carloni A,Crowley E. Rapid guide for missions. Analyzing local institutions and livelihoods [M]. Rome:Food and Agriculture Organization,2005:49-78
[3] Nega F,Tollens E,Nyssen J,et al. Household livelihood strategies and forest dependence in the highlands of Tigray,Northern Ethiopia [J]. Agricultural Systems,2008,98(2):147-155
[4] Motsholapheko M R,Kgathi D L,Vanderpost C. Rural livelihoods and household adaptation to extreme flooding in the Okavango Delta, Botswana [J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth,2011,36(8):984-995
[5] Bebbington A J. Capital and capabilities:A framework for analyzing peasant viability,rural livelihoods and poverty [J]. World Development,1999,27(12):2021-2044
[6] Brown D R,Stephens E C,Ouma J O,et al. Livelihood strategies in the rural Kenyan highlands [J]. African Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics,2006,1(1):21-35
[7] Pfeifer C,Jongeneelc A,Marthijn W,et al. Landscape properties as drivers for farm diversification:A dutch case study [J]. Land Use Policy,2009,26(4):1106-1115
[8] Wang Liping,Wang Cheng,Li Xiaoqing. Research on rural household differentiation based on the quantification of livelihood assets:Evidence from 471 rural households in Bailin village,Sha Pingba district,Chongqing city [J]. Geographical Research,2012,31(5):945-954[王利平,王成,李晓庆. 基于生计资产量化的农户分化研究-以重庆市沙坪坝区白林村471户农户为例 [J]. 地理研究,2012,31(5):945-954]
[9] Wang Cheng,Wang Liping,Li Xiaoqing,et al. The source of the forward-security of farmers' livelihood and settlement integration:Based on the survey of 477 farmers in Bailin village,west suburbs of Chongqing [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2011,66(8):1141-1152[王成,王利平,李晓庆,等. 农户后顾生计来源及其居民点整合研究-基于重庆市西部郊区白林村471户农户调查 [J]. 地理学报,2011,66(8):1141-1152]
[10] Fang Yiping,Fan Jie,Shen Maoying,et al. Sensitivity of livelihood strategy to livelihood capital in mountain areas:Empirical analysis based on different settlements in the upper reaches of the Minjiang river, China [J]. Ecological Indicators,2014,38(3):225–235
[11] Cramb R A,Purcell T,Ho T C S. Participatory assessment of rural livelihoods in the central highlands of Vietnam [J]. Agricultural Systems,2004,(81):255-272
[12] Wang Chengchao,Yang Yusheng. Review of research on mountainous ecological restoration based on farmer household livelihood evolution [J]. Journal of Natural Resource,2011,26(2):344-352[王成超,杨玉盛. 基于农户生计演化的山地生态恢复研究综述 [J]. 自然资源学报,2011,26(2):344-352]
[13] He Renwei,Liu Shaoquan,Liu Yunwei,et al. Evaluation and spatial distribution of farmer's livelihood capital in representative mountain areas:A case study of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture of Sichuan,China [J]. Mountain Research,2014,32(6):641-651[何仁伟,刘邵权,刘运伟,等. 典型山区农户生计资本评价及其空间格局-以四川省凉山彝族自治州为例[J]. 山地学报,2014,32(6):641-651]
[14] DFID. The sustainable livelihoods distance learning guide [M]. London:DFID Working Paper,2007:45-57
[15] Scoones I.,Borras S M. Livelihood's perspectives and rural development [J]. Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety,2009,1(3):297-303
[16] Gill G J,Hoebink P. Seasonal labour migration in rural Nepal:A preliminary overview [M]. London:Overseas Development Institute,2003:20-23
[17] Mansoob M S,Scott G. Spatial–horizontal inequality and the maoist insurgency in Nepal [J]. Review of Development Economics,2005,9(1):121–134
[18] Regmi B R,Bhandari D. Climate change adaptation in Nepal:Exploring ways to overcome the barriers [J]. Journal of Forest and Livelihood,2013,11(1):43-61
[19] Dhakal K P. Assessment of existing situation,policy and contribution to livelihood assets in private forestry [D]. Tribhuvan University,2007:39-136
[20] Parker P,Thapa B,Jacob A. Decentralizing conservation and diversifying livelihoods within Kanchenjunga Conservation Area,Nepal [J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2015,164:96-103
[21] Piya,Luni,Maharjan,KeshavLall,Joshi,Niraj Prakash. Livelihood strategies of indigenous nationalities in Nepal:A case of Chepangs [J]. Journal of International Development and Cooperation,2011,17:99-113
[22] Khadka R B,Khanal A B. Environmental management plan(EMP)for Melamchi water supply project,Nepal [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2008,146(1-3):225-234
[23] DFID. Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets [M]. London:DFID Working Paper,1999:17-39
[24] Martha G,Roberts W,Yang Guoan. The international progress of sustainable development research:a comparison of vulnerability analysis and the sustainable livelihoods approach [J]. Progress in Geography,2003,22(1):11-20[Martha G,Roberts W,杨国安. 可持续发展研究方法国际进展—脆弱性分析方法与可持续生计方法比较 [J]. 地理科学进展,2003,22(1):11-20]
[25] Greene W H. Econometric analysis [J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association,2003,89(428):182-197
[26] Zhang Wentong, Dong Wei. SPSS statistical analysis advanced tutorial [M]. BeiJing:Higher Education Press,2003:177-180[张文彤,董伟. SPSS统计分析高级教程 [M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2003,177-180]

相似文献/References:

[1]何仁伟,刘邵权,刘运伟,等.典型山区农户生计资本评价及其空间格局——以四川省凉山彝族自治州为例[J].山地学报,2014,(06):641.
　HE Renwei,LIU Shaoquan,LIU Yunwei,et al.Evaluation and Spatial Distribution of Farmer’s Livelihood Capital in Representative Mountain Areas: A Case Study of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture of Sichuan，China[J].Mountain Research,2014,(05):641.
[2]崔晓明,陈 佳,杨新军.乡村旅游影响下的农户可持续生计研究——以秦巴山区安康市为例[J].山地学报,2017,(01):85.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000199]
　CUI Xiaoming,CHEN Jia,YANG Xinjun.Research on Sustainable Livelihoods Impacted by Rural Tourism——A Case Study of Ankang in Qinling and Bashan Mountainous Areas[J].Mountain Research,2017,(05):85.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000199]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2016-07-14; 改回日期( Accepted):2016-08-17。
基金项目(Foundation item):科技部对发展中国家科技援助项目; 国际山地中心喜马拉雅大学联盟2015年度种子基金项目。[Aid Project on Science and Technology for Developing Countries from Ministry of Science and Technology of China; 2015 Seed Fund Project of Himalaya University Union of the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development.]
作者简介(Biography):苏艺(1986-),女,河北邯郸人,博士生,主要从事山区聚落与城镇化研究。[Su Yi(1986- ), female, born in Handan County, Hebei, Ph.D candidate, mainly engaged in research on rural settlements in mountain areas and urbanization.] E-mail: su.suyi@163.com
*通信作者(Corresponding author):邓伟(1957-),男,辽宁沈阳人,博士,研究员,主要从事山区发展研究。[Deng Wei(1957- ), male, born in Shenyang, Liaoning province, Ph.D, Professor, mainly engaged in mountain development study.] E-mail: dengwei@imde.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-09-30