[1]陈玉真,王 峰,尤志明*,等.不同植茶年限茶园土壤的物理性状及渗透性能[J].山地学报,2016,(01):38-45.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000098]
 CHEN Yuzhen,WANG Feng,YOU Zhiming,et al.Soil Physical Properties and Infiltration Capability with Different Tea Plantation Ages[J].Mountain Research,2016,(01):38-45.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000098]
点击复制

不同植茶年限茶园土壤的物理性状及渗透性能()
分享到:

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2016年01期
页码:
38-45
栏目:
山地生态与环境
出版日期:
2016-02-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Soil Physical Properties and Infiltration Capability with Different Tea Plantation Ages
作者:
陈玉真12王 峰12尤志明12*吴志丹12江福英12张文锦12翁伯琦2
1 福建省农业科学院茶叶研究所,福建 福安355015; 2福建省红壤山地农业生态过程重点实验室,福建 福州 350013
Author(s):
CHEN Yuzhen12WANG Feng12YOU Zhiming12WU Zhidan12JIANG Fuying12 ZHANG Wenjin12WENG Boqi2
1 Tea Research Institute,Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Fuan,355015,Fujian,China; 2. Fujian Province Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Hilly Red Soil,Fuzhou 350013,Fujian,China
关键词:
丘陵山地植茶年限土壤渗透性能拟合模型
Keywords:
hilly areatea plantation agesoil infiltration capacitymodel fitting
分类号:
S152.7+2
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000098
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
利用环刀法、主成分分析法及Pearson相关分析法,对闽东丘陵山地不同植茶年限茶园(撂荒地为对照)土壤物理性状及渗透性能进行了研究,并评价了4种常用入渗模型的适宜性。结果表明: 1)与撂荒地处理相比,新垦3 a茶园土壤容重显著增加,土壤总孔隙度、毛管孔隙度、最大持水量和毛管持水量显著降低,随着植茶年限的增加,茶园土壤物理性状均有所改善。2)不同处理均表现为初始渗透速率>平均渗透速率>稳定渗透速率,与撂荒地处理相比,新垦茶园显著降低了土壤渗透性能,成龄茶园(10 a、30 a和50 a)茶园土壤渗透性能高于撂荒地,改植换种茶园渗透性能与撂荒地接近;主成分分析评价的土壤入渗能力排序为50 a茶园>10 a茶园>30 a茶园>撂荒地>改制换种2 a茶园>新垦3 a茶园。3) Horton模型对各处理土壤入渗过程的拟合度最高,其模拟值与实测值接近。4) Pearson相关分析显示,土壤渗透性能与土壤容重呈显著或极显著负相关,与土壤总孔隙度均呈显著或极显著正相关关系,与其他指标相关性不显著。以上结果表明,新垦茶园显著降低了土壤物理性状和渗透性能,成龄茶园(10 a、30 a和50 a)有助于改善土壤渗透性能,Horton模型对于丘陵山地茶园土壤入渗过程具有较高实用性。
Abstract:
Using double-rings method,principal component analysis and Pearson correlation analysis,the characteristics of soil physical properties and infiltration capacity of different tea plantation ages(taking fallow land for comparison) were studied in hilly area of Fujian Province,China. In addition,the changes of soil infiltration process over time were estimated with different infiltration models(Kostiakov model,Philip model,Horton model and general empirical model). The results indicate that: 1) Compared with the fallow land treatment,the bulk density of soil in newly-reclaimed young tea garden was significantly increased,while the total soil porosity,capillary porosity,maximum water-holding capacity and capillary water decreased significantly compared with control. With the tea plantation age increase,the physical properties of tea garden soil were also improved. 2) Infiltration eigenvalues of six treatments were shown as initial infiltration rate > average infiltration rate > stable infiltration rate. Compared with the fallow land treatment,the soil infiltration capability of newly-reclaimed young tea garden were significantly decreased,soil infiltration capability of adult tea garden(10,30 and 50 years) were significantly higher the fallow land treatment,and no significant different in soil infiltration capability were found between the fallow land and collar pruning tea garden. Using principal component analysis method to evaluate the soil infiltration capacity,the order express 50 years>10 years>30 years>fallow land>collar pruning tea garden> newly-reclaimed young tea garden. 3) The Horton model was better accommodative to the hill tea garden,the tested results and simulation results was consistent. 4) Pearson correlation analysis showed that infiltration of six treatments had a significant negative linear correlation with soil bulk density,and a positive significant positive linear correlation with soil total porosity,but not significant correlation with other soil physical properties. These results indicated that the physical properties and infiltration capacity in newly-reclaimed young tea garden soil could significantly decreased,soil infiltration capacity in adult tea garden(10,30 and 50 years)were better than that in newly-reclaimed young tea,and the Horton model was best one to describe the soil infiltration processes of this area.

参考文献/References:

[1] 段文标,颜永强,赵雨森.莲花湖库区落叶松水源涵养林土壤入渗性能的空间分布特征[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(12): 2081-2090[Duan Wenbiao,Yan Yongqiang,Zhao Yusen. Spatial distribution characteristics of soil infiltration capacity in water conservation forest of Larix gmelini in Lianhua Lake Reservoir Area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2010,25(12): 2081-2090]
[2] Jimenez C C,Tejedor M,Morillas G,et al. Infiltration rate in andosols: effect of changes in vegetation cover (Tenerife,Spain)[J]. Journal of soil and water conservation,2006,61(3): 153-158
[3] Rachman A,Anderson S H,Gantzer C J,et al. Influence of stiff-stemmed grass hedge systems on infiltration[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2004,68(6):2000-2006
[4] 刘芝芹,黄新会,王克勤.金沙江干热河谷不同土地利用类型土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(2): 57-62[Liu Zhiqin,Huang Xinhui,Wang Keqin. Soil infiltration characteristics and its influencing factors of different forest soils in Jingshajiang Dry-hot Valley Region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,28(2): 57-62]
[5] 杨永辉,赵世伟,雷廷武,等.耕作对土壤入渗性能的影响[J].生态学报,2006,26(5):1624-1630[Yang Yonghui,Zhao Shiwei,Lei Tingwu,et al. Tillage on soil infiltration under simulated rainfall conditions[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2006,26(5):1624-1630]
[6] 林代杰,郑子成,张锡洲,等.不同土地利用方式下土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2010(1): 33-36[Lin Daijie,Zheng Zicheng,Zhang Xizhou,et al. Characteristic and influencing factors of soil infiltration of different land use patterns [J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2010(1): 33-36]
[7] Murray C D,Buttle J M. Infiltration and soil water mixing on forested and harvested slopes during spring snowmelt,Turkey Lakes Watershed,central Ontario[J].Journal of Hydrology,2005,306(1):1-20
[8] 刘春成,李毅,任鑫,等.四种入渗模型对斥水土壤入渗规律的适用性[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(5):62-67[Liu Chuncheng,Li Yi,Ren Xin,et al.Applicability of four infiltration models to infiltration characteristics of water repellent soils[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,27(5):62-67]
[9] 赵景波,张慧慧,马淑苗. 青海湖沙柳河镇南部土壤入渗规律[J].山地学报,2013 (6): 693-700[Zhao Jingbo,Zhao Huihui,Ma Shumiao. Soil infiltration rule in southern Shaliuhe Town of Qinghai Lake Area[J]. Mountain Research,2013(6):693-700]
[10] 侯秀丽,付登高,阎凯,等. 滇中不同植被恢复策略下土壤入渗性能及其影响因素[J]. 山地学报,2013(3):273-279[Hou Xiuli,Fu,Denggao,Yan Kai,et al. Soil infiltration and correlative analysis with some factors in the different restoration method in Central Yunnan[J].Mountain Research,2013(3):273-279]
[9] 武世亮,聂卫波,马孝义.土壤特性与 Philip 入渗公式标定因子的空间变异性关系[J].排灌机械工程学报,2014,32(8):730-736Wu Shiliang,Nie Weibo,Ma Xiaoyi. Spatial variation of soil physical characteristics and calibration factor of Philip infiltration formula[J].Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering,2014,32(8):730-736]
[10] 陈小英,查轩,陈世发.山地茶园水土流失及生态调控措施研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(1):51-54Chen Xiaoying,Cha Xuan,Chen Shifa. Research on the soil and water loss and ecological treatment measures in hilly tea plantation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(1):51-54]
[11] 刘敏英,郑子成,李廷轩.不同植茶年限土壤团聚体的分布特征及稳定性研究[J].茶叶科学,2012,32(5): 402-410[Liu Minying,Zheng Zicheng,Li Tingxuan. Study on the composition and stability of soil aggregates with different tea plantation Age[J]. Journal of Tea Science,2012,32(5): 402-410]
[12] 吴士文,索炎炎,张峥嵘,等.南方茶园土壤酸化特征及交换性酸在水稳性团聚体中的分布[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(1): 195-199[Wu Shiwen,Suo Yanyan,Zhang Zhengrong,et al. Acidification of tea plantation soil and distribution of exchangeable acidity in water-stable aggregate[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,26(1): 195-199]
[13] 俞慎,何振立,陈国潮,等.不同树龄茶树根层土壤化学特性及其对微生物区系和数量的影响[J].土壤学报,2003,40(3):433-439[Yu Shen,He Zhenli,Chen Guochao,et al. Soil chemical characteristics and their impacts on soil microflora in the root layer of tea plants with different cultivating ages[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2003,40(3):433-439]
[14] 刘敏英,郑子成,李廷轩.不同植茶年限土壤团聚体的分布特征及稳定性研究[J].茶叶科学,2012,32(5): 402-410[Liu Minying,Zheng Zhicheng,Li Tingxuan. Study on the composition and stability of soil aggregates with different tea plantation age[J]. Journal of Tea Science,2012,32(5): 40-410]
[15] 王晟强,郑子成,李廷轩,等.植茶年限对土壤团聚体中交换性盐基离子分布的影响[J].土壤学报,2013,50(5):1013-1020[Wang Shengqiang,Zheng Zicheng,Li Tingxuan,et al. Effects of age of tea plantations on distribution of exchangeable base cations in soil aggregates[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2013,50(5):1013-1020]
[16] 刘目兴,聂艳,于婧. 不同初始含水率下粘质土壤的入渗过程[J].生态学报,2012,32(3) :871-878[Liu Muxing1,Nie Yan,Yu Jing. The infiltration process of clay soil under different initial soil water contents[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2012,32(3) :871-878]
[17] 徐小军,何丙辉,胡恒,等. 新生水土流失对汶川震区土壤水分入渗的影响[J].中国农业科学,2012,45(12): 2520-2529[Xu Xiaojun,He Binghui,Hu Heng,et al. Effect on soil infiltration of water and soil loss made by earthquake in Wenchuan area[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2012,45(12):2520-2529]
[18] 林绍霞,张清海,张珍明,等. 不同垦植模式茶园土壤性状及团聚体特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(6):45-49[Lin Shaoxia,Zhang qinghai,Zhang Zhenming,et al. Research for soil properties and aggregates in tea plantation with different planting patterns[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation.2012,19(6):45-49]
[19] 彭萍,杨水平,李品武,等.植茶对土壤环境效应分析研究[J].茶叶科学,2007,27(3): 265-270[Peng Ping,Yang Shuiping,Li Pin-wu,et al. Effects of tea planting on the yellow soil properties in tea garden[J]. Journal of Tea Science,2007,27(3): 265-270]
[20] 杨扬,刘炳君,房江育,等.不同植茶年龄茶树根际与非根际土壤微生物及酶活性特征研究[J]. 中国农学通报,2011,27(27): 118-121[Yang Yang,Liu Bingjun,Fang Jiangyu,et al. The study on characteristics of microbes and enzyme activity in rhizosphere and out rhizosphere soil of tea garden at various ages [J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2011,27(27):118-121]
[21] 杨玉梅,郑子成,李廷轩.不同土地利用方式下土壤抗冲性动态变化特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2010(4):64-68[Yang Yu mei,Zheng Zicheng,Li Tingxuan. Soil anti-scourability dynamic variation characteristics and its influencing factors under different land use types[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2010(4):64-68]
[22] 刘道平,陈三雄,张金池,等.浙江安吉主要林地类型土壤渗透性[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(3):493-498[Liu Daoping,Chen Sanxiong,Zhang Jinchi,et al. Soil infiltration characteristics under main vegetation types in Anji County of Zhejiang Province[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2007,18(3):493-498]
[23] 闫东锋,杨喜田. 豫南山区典型林地土壤入渗特征及影响因素分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(6): 43-50[Yan Dongfeng,Yang Xitian. Characteristics and influencing factors of soil infiltration of typical forest lands in southern mountains of Henan Province[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,9(6): 43-50]
[24] Li Y Y,Shao M A. Change of soil physical properties under long-term natural vegetation restoration in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2006,64(1):77-96
[25] 王国梁,刘国彬,周生路.黄土丘陵沟壑区小流域植被恢复对土壤稳定入渗的影响[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(5):529-535[Wang Guoliang,Liu Guobin,Zhou Shenglu. The effect of vegetation restoration on soil stable infiltration rates in small watershed of Loess Gully region [J]. Journal of Natural resources,2003,18(5):529-535]
[26] Jouquet P,Huchet G,Bottinelli N,et al. Does the influence of earthworms on water infiltration,nitrogen leaching and soil respiration depend on the initial soil bulk density? A mesocosm experiment with the endogenic species Metaphire posthuma[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2012,48(5): 561-567
[27] Lipiec J,Ku J,Sowińska-Jurkiewicz A,et al. Soil porosity and water infiltration as influenced by tillage methods[J].Soil and Tillage research,2006,89(2): 210-220
[28] 李雪转,樊贵盛. 土壤有机质含量对土壤入渗能力影响的试验研究[J].太原理工大学学报,2006,37(1):59-62[Li Xuezhua,Fan Guisheng. Influence of organic matter content on infiltration capacity of field soils[J].Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology,2006,37(1):59-62]
[29] 薛冬,姚槐应,黄昌勇. 不同利用年限茶园土壤矿化,硝化作用特性[J].土壤学报,2007,44(2):373-378[Xue Dong,Yao Huaiying,Huang Changyong. Characteristics of mineralization and nitrification in soils of tea gardens different in age[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2007,44(2): 373-378]
[30] 王全九,叶海燕,史晓南,等.土壤初始含水量对微咸水入渗特征影响[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(1):51-53[Wang Qiujiu,Ye Haiyan,Shi Xiaonan,et al. Influence of initial water content on slight saline water infiltration[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,18(1):51-53]
[31] 胡建朋,杨吉华,罗明达,等.山东石灰岩山地不同林分类型土壤入渗特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(3):54-58[Hu Jianpeng,Yang Jihua,Luo Mingda,et al. Study on characteristics of soil infiltration of different forest types in limestone mountainous[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,25(3):54-58]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2015-06-30;改回日期(Accepted):2015-07-31。 基金项目(Foundation item):国家科技支撑计划(2014BAD15B01);福建省公益类科研院所专项(2014R1012-10);国家茶叶产业体系 (CARS-23)。[Supported by the national Science-technology Support Plan Projects(2014BAD15B01);Fujian funding scientific research program(2014R1012-10);China tea research system(CARS-23).] 作者简介(Biography):陈玉真(1985-),女(汉),硕士,助理研究员,主要从事茶树栽培与环境生态研究。[Chen Yuzhen(1985-),female (Han nationality),mainly engaged in research on tea cultivation and ecology.] E-mail:82458lin@163.com *通信作者(Corresponding author):尤志明(1964-),男,学士,研究员,主要从事作物栽培研究。[You Zhiming(1964-),male, bachelor,Professor,mainly engaged in research on crop cultivation.] E-mail:847842412@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01